Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help please - with Cap 1 and FPC


Madcat333
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first post ever - any help will be thankfully appreciated.

 

Cap 1 recently terminated my c/c acct and passed the chasing of the debt to FPC.

 

The first I knew of it was when I received a termination notice.

 

Upon receipt of the termination notice I rang Cap1 and was told a default notice had been sent out a month or so earlier and since I had done nothing in compliance with it they had taken things to the next level.

 

I stated that I had never received the notice and what should I do to resolve the issue. They told me FPC was the only course of action open to me.

 

I have no qualms about paying Cap 1 what I owe but feel that I have been treated unjustly by not having the notice served correctly in order for me to sort things out with them.

 

Cap 1 say they will not supply a copy of the default notice but tell me one was generated and posted.

 

All I want to do is pay them whats owed versus their statements and sort out the default issue. I do not require anything more from them.

 

FPC are pestering me to make an arrangement with them which I will not do ! They keep telling me I am "unwilling to pay" to which my reply is:- I pay money directly to Cap 1 who I owe it to - not third parties !

 

Once again any advice on dealing with Cap 1 would be appreciated.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for such a prompt reply ims.

 

As yet I have not looked into the charges side of things.

 

I was more worried about the DCA angle and their pestering.

 

I will certainly be ignoring the DCA from this moment onward.

 

I am a little concerned that Cap 1 have acted unreasonably and that I had a right to sort things out

with them under the default notice they are alleged to have sent.

 

Although I am continuing to make payments to them I want to apply some pressure in order for them

to rectify their mistake.

 

I'd be happy to receive statements from them and pay them without having the facility of a card, such is my distaste

towards them for their poor service.

 

Obviously I then have the problem of the default status on my CRA files to contend with.

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask on what basis a default notice was issued? I mean were you in arrears or was there a bad payment history? can you give some more info?

 

Why do you feel they issued a DN by mistake?

 

I'd certainly be looking into getting charges back as well.

 

Thanks

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly the same game now with them

 

been like it since last october

 

dont worry about freddies

 

they nor anydca can do stuff all to you

 

just pay cap1 what you can when you can by internet banking [NOT DD!]

 

oh and if freddies write or ring you at work

 

the TS are curently VERY interested in the letters/calls

 

freddies were warned of this twice in 2009 but have now changed name to FPC

and think they can just start up their old unlawful tactics again.

 

shock coming!!

 

they've been recorded three times now being told not to call a works number

even got the operations room [what?] supervisor to removed the number

 

still get 5-10 automated calles to the works

each is being logged recorded and sent to my TS contact.

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the Card since April 2006 - no real problems with meeting minimum monthly payments.

 

Around July time last year I was unable to make the full minimum payments

 

In September 2010 I approached Cap 1 to make an arrangement to pay minimum payment (approx. £170) plus a minimum additional £30.00 to clear the arrears.

 

They would not listen and would only accept things on their terms - £272 pcm for 6 months.

 

I told them it was unreasonable but made as good an effort as I could to repay.

 

I queried why they had amended the payment due date to the 3rd of the month from the 21st and was told not to worry about it.

 

Consequently they were heaping £24 per month on to each passing month in charges, which had they stuck to payment dates of the 21st would have been avoided.

 

I might have had small arrears by the time of the default notice. which if served for a breach of minimum payments (?) I would have accepted knowing that there was nothing that could not have been sorted within the period it allows to rectify things.

 

There has been no unwillingness to pay on my part - but dealing with them and getting them to appreciate and understand is nigh on impossible.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go for them for those unlawful charges plus compound interest. That will help with the o/s balance

 

As part of your claim you can request the default notice be removed as it was in wholly or in part due their unlawful charges.

 

In the meantime pay them what you can afford....you tell them what they are getting not the other way around.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks once again for the advice.

 

I am going to be putting the finishing touches to a letter over the weekend which I will be sending to their Nottingham Offices for the attention of Mr Liam Quegan.

 

I had cca'd them at the beginning of April 2011, as per some advice I had read in these forums.

 

He replied in letter form, dated 21 April 2011 received by me 3rd May 2011.

 

They supplied a copy of the Agreement which all looks in order, but he commented that they would not supply a copy of the default notice because they didn't have to.

 

Nor did he feel the need to discuss it further since they assure me one was posted !

 

He then corresponded to tell me FPC was the way to go !

 

Obviously I disagree - so it looks as if this might be the start of something lengthy in terms of getting things sorted.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think that they are right in that they don't have to supply a copy of DN.

 

Might not be as lengthy a process as you might think.

 

Have you got ALL of yur statements? If you have you won't need to SAR them and the procedure would be preliminary letter requesting charges back plus interest, followed by lba with the same request if there is no payment made. If they still don't cough then it is off to court with claim for charges + CI + Stat Int.

 

If you haven't got all your statements then SAR would be necessary to get them all and then revert to the procedure above.

 

They usually cough up before getting into the court.

 

ims

Edited by ims21
spelling

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi All.

 

Based on the above info I have continued to regularly pay Cap 1 an amount via standing order.

 

I am still receiving letters and phone calls from FPC/ Fredricksons which I have logged but not responded to.

 

However I have just received a letter from Bryan Carter Solicitors stating that they want to take me to Court unless I contact FPC and make an arrangement with them.

 

I will still continue to pay Cap 1 directly but am wondering about doing something with regards to the recent correspondence I received.

 

Thanking you in advance for any forthcoming advice.

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

may. might,instructed, recommend

 

never WILL.

 

got all those letters in te same order three times over now

 

the balance will be wiped out with a penalty charges reclaim+unt at their rate

 

i stopped paying months ago now.

 

oneday i might fire off a charges reclaim

but i'll let the situation continue for now

as i want to see what willl happen to it.

 

if you can put up with the computer generatedrubbish then i would ignore them

 

got that SAR done yet?

 

on the DN front

they only have to show that the 'system' requested a DN be sent

they dont 'have' to have a copy

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...