Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Garage - saying parts are broken when they are not


ltunstall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4750 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i need some advice really, on good friday i took my car to a chain of garges, for a full service and M-O-T. The mot was due on the 26th which was tuesday, but they said they didnt have time to book in for m-o-t and could only manage the service, - Fair enough.

 

But when arriving to pick up the car, they stated several items were broken and needed to be replaced as it would fail its m-o-t. So with having a family etc, started to panic as we needed to car and didnt have the money to replace the parts required.

 

Rear Coil spring broken - this was the main item it would fail on and would need them replacing in pairs etc

 

and needed all new disc brakes and pads and they were dangerous. and i have this down in writing

 

So i left it at that, and took it to another local garage and explained my problems so i could book them in to be fixed - he took a look, and found nothing to be wrong like the prevous garage has said and its passed its mot (didnt think garages turned away cash)

 

but i just dont think its right for a large chain of garages, to say items are broke when they are not. its fraud and would like to know whats the best way of writing to them to complain etc?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Favourite hobby horse of mine, having seen so many people end up with bills they needn't have paid :evil:

 

You say it was a chain of garages - a chain who normally specialise in brakes and offer discounted full services and MOTs perhaps? We used to have one near us who advertised half price MOTs and cheap servicing, but amazingly an awful lot of their customers were advised that new brakes, discs, exhausts or tyres were needed for it to pass the MOT!

 

Not much you can do but to write to their Head Office and complain, or to contact the local Trading Standards as far as I am aware, but this isn't really my forte so am happy for others to give any additional advice.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This garage that wanted to [edit]. Wouldn't happen to have fitters that you can't get better than, would it? You know the song.

You can't get better than a **** fit fitter, You can't get better than a **** fit fitter, You can't get better than a **** fit fitter, we're the boys to trust.

 

It would astonish me if it was because they never, ever suggest work that is completely un-necessary at all. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have been at this for YEARS. But sometimes it backfires on them. Viz:- Old codger goes in with faulty exhaust or something. Sit in waiting area. Foreman/ manager comes after a while and says good news and bad news. Good news is exhaust is fixed, bad news is that rear shocker has gone, but they are only fitted in pairs. OK says the codger, fix them. Later manager comes with bill. Codger takes out cash to pay exhaust only --manager remonstrates, so codger tells him to look in glove compartment where he will find receipt for shocks still under warranty. S-it-- bonus up the spout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This garage that wanted to editWouldn't happen to have fitters that you can't get better than, would it? You know the song.

You can't get better than a **** fit fitter,

I'd not have expected the expletive filter to respond to "kwik" - you must have written something more apposite. :lol:

Edited by MARTIN3030
Link to post
Share on other sites

For info DD,the content was edited as it could be deemed libellous.

This is because there has been an association made between a named trader and the alleged incident.

Had there not been any names,then of course the wording would have been acceptable.

We ask that common sense prevail when posting,to protect the site from potential legal action.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ltunstall,

 

Yes,you should put something in writing to their HO,and advise that if they are unable to provide you with an acceptable explanation,you will be reporting this to your local Trading Standards.

Its important that you do this,since if no one bothers they continue to get away with it.

You could also look at complaining to any associated trade associations they are subscribed to,since under CPUT,they are required to be upholding recognised codes of conduct and best practice.

Have a look also if the trader is a member of any local council initiatives such as good garage registers/schemes-and report to them also.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No-of course not,but the edits were done for a reason,and the words felt that could pose a problem were removed.

It does not help that after doing this,the words are re-posted.

Its not rocket science.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car could quite possibly be in need of new brake discs and pads even it has just passed an MOT. The tester can't remove anything to get a good look at them, whilst on a service they can remove the wheels to get a good look. The discs could have a good few mm of corrosion all over them and it can't fail an MOT on that. Provided that they haven't got chunks out of them, are not cracked, wafer thin or contaminated they can't fail. To be honest they have to be alot below a gernerally accepted service standard before they can fail a MOT. You can't really replace the discs and re-use the pads.

 

With the spring it's possible that a part of it could be missing from an end, which the testing garage missed and it's good practice (not compulsory) to replace spriings and dampers in axle pairs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once had a similar experience. The one and only time I paid to have a car serviced, had a call to say the disks and pads needed replacing. Told them not to do the work. The service sheet was saying "95%" worn and other "accurate" figures for pad wear. Having the car back from the extortionate service, I removed the wheels, noting a nice "crack" of the wheel nut loosening - not something that happens if the wheel was removed for a proper brake inspection - Measured pad and disk thikcness properly, no more than 65% worn. Also the brake bleed nipple covers were in place and dry underneath. I understood that part of the service was a brake fluid change. Also the cover under the engine was hanging off, as screws were missing.

 

Took car back to the place where it was "serviced" ( a main dealer) and told them to do the work that I had paid for. They said that If I wanted a more accurate brake wear measurement, they could do this, but I would have to pay for it!!!! They were informed that this would not be required. They then claimed a brake fluid change was not required. Well, the book time for the service that I paid for does include the fluid change. A few comings and goings to the sevice managers office and the car was finally serviced properly. Never again.

 

So, perhaps the moral of the story is to take a bit of trouble to learn a little about the car you drive. A little investment in a decent jack and stands and a few tools can save all the hassle of garages trying to sell you parts you do not yet need. Also, it can save you money. £40 for a set of pads and disks, compared with a national chain that wanted £220 to change them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Traffer, brake fluid change--I had the exact trouble with Arnold Clark Peugeot. They say it's not on their autodata sheet, but i told them i wanted car serviced as per owners handbook. Only when threatened with reporting to PSA group did they agree to change the fluid.

 

The BIG question is "How many cars are on the road and not properly serviced????" How many people are paying high prices for cars with "Full Dealer Service History" when they are not in fact serviced.

I make no apology for repeating the message "get your local family garage to look after your car"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

another victim of the boys in blue fitter gang by the sound of it !!, they also have a tendency to spray shockers with WD40 and then ask the customer to go and take a look saying that the shockers are leaking !, big business for them up in high places there that lay down financial targets for monthly takings on each branch and of course who gets to pay for all the financial targets??? the consumer of course who else, im sure they should be sending out xmas cards to customers by now to all there loyal customers who give up there spare time and money to be hanging round these places having unessary work done !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...