Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GoDebt Advice Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4499 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I also need some advice regarding GoDebt. I brought a car from Yes Car Credit on 2 April 2001. When I orginally phoned them a few days before I was told that the car I had could be used as full deposit. On arriving at their garage in Acton, I picked a Vauxhall Astra and started going through all the necessary details. When they took down the details of the car I had brought in for part exchange as full deposit and checked its details, they said there was a query on the licence plate because it had had personal number plates and therefore the car to them was probably only worth £1. However, they agreed to give me £500 for the car and take it off the price of the car. The car was £5557.00 (although this was not displayed on the actual vehicle), they sold it to me for £5057.00 and this is the cash price listed on the credit agreement.

 

After much discussion and them sorting out the credit I was told that I would also need to pay a deposit. I said I wasn't expecting to have to pay this as I was told previously that the car I was exchanging would be accepted as full deposit. After some discussion I agreed, probably foolishly, to pay a £450 deposit.

 

On checking my agreement this deposit is listed as a down payment towards the additional insurances. Although I didn't want the additional insurances I was told I had to have them otherwise I wouldn't be able to get the loan. The loan was for a period of 48 months, and I regularly made payments on this loan for the first 38 months until I got into some financial difficulties. I have received correspondence from GoDebt intermittently over the last few years and have had some phone calls to my work number requesting that this issue be resolved. I have now received a letter from them again stating that I owe £2212.00 but they would accept £500.00 in full and final settlement of my liablity.

 

I am also receiving regular harassing phone calls to my work phone from various people at Go, including Sherrie and now regular harassing calls from Stuart Barns. He also rang my mother yesterday, as she was down as one of my original character witnesses, asking for my personal contact details, which unfortunately my mum gave to him as she didn't know what it was relating to. Someone has also rang my parents again to do and know all their details and have said this matter needs to be sorted today, although they couldn't tell my mum or dad what it was regarding. Surely them having these details is some sort of breach of the Data Protection Act?

 

So as well as receiving harassing and threatening calls at work I am now receiving them at home and on my mobile including text messages. I was sent a text message saying "a process server will be attending at my place of work to serve you with a statutory demand in bankruptcy. Failure to address this matter today will start proceedings against you through the *** county court. Please note your employment and home may be affected. Please take this final opportunity to contact us on 02078312161 asking for Mrs Morris or Mr Barns"

 

Stuart Barns has also sent me an email to my work address. He spoke to one of my colleagues yesterday and demanded that I be pulled out of a meeting to speak to him. He also rang this morning, when I was out of the office, and asked that he be kept on hold until I returned to my desk. My colleague told him that she didn't know how long I would be and he insisted that he be kept on hold as he had all day. He also said he would go on the works website to find out who the person in charge was to send them an email.

 

I am desperate to sort this matter out and to stop them harassing me, especially at work. Should I reply to his email stating that after seeking legal advice I have been advised not to discuss this matter with yourselves on the phone and that I have put something in writing to them. Please can you advise

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

first go to the Library section of CAG forums, there are letter templates that will stop harassment by phone, I've used them they do work, next is ignore the threats over bankruptcy and visiting you at work they cant and they know it, its just another form of harassment, and contacting you at work is illegal. Look through the library of letter templates, you will probably find even more useful letters tie them up and watch then disappear, its amazing how good they work. I no longer receive any calls from any DCA or their buddies, I get the odd letter but very very few. Never talk to them on the phone always in writing and always recorded delivery.

 

As an aside Yes Car Credit was owned by Provident but due to poor PR and adverse TV coverage it was wound up in Feb 2010, now I don't know but would you still owe money to company no longer trading perhaps someone with more experience/knowledge may be able to answer that.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As to whether you still need to pay; it depends on whether the debt was assigned before the liquidation. If not, then the Insolvency/official receiver should try and recoup all the money that they can, in order to pay the creditors. Would they go to Court? I doubt it, but they perhaps would for a very large sum (tens of thousands) other than that, it's just not worth pursuing, as they want as much in as little a time as possibleSo send a CCA letter before you do anything

I am a lawyer, but I am an academic lawyer. I do not practice as a barrister or solicitor. You should consult a practising Solicitor BEFORE taking any Court or other action

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

if you bought the car from yes then the agreement will not be worth the paper it is written on....when you have a copy of the agreement let us know....i will also need to know whether you took out the 'optional insurances'.....these make the agreement null and void as they mistate the amount of credit and put you at an unfair advantage if you hand the vehicle back or it is repossessed....i have fought a number of these now and so far we aint lost one yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Xx

Xx

Date

 

Agreement number

 

Dear sir/madam

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company

after having my agreement from DAF looked at I can now confirm the following

 

I HAVE NO INTENTION OF MAKING ANY PAYMENT ON THIS ACCOUNT. I REQUIRE GoDebt TO EITHER CLOSE DOWN THIS ACCOUNT OR ISSUE AN N1 county court claimlink3.giflink3.gif

 

I will now explain why the agreement is unenforceable, might I also suggest yourselves running it past a solicitor qualified in the consumer credit act and regulations.

 

When the agreement was taken out, I was informed that I had to take out payment protection insurance to cover the creditor if I was unable to make repayments.

 

Now this constitutes a charge for credit as it has been included in the amount of credit.

 

As the amount of credit has been misstated, the agreement cannot be enforced, as the amount of credit is a prescribed term, a court is prohibited from enforcing the agreement.

 

For clarity may I suggest you study s.127 (3) of the consumer credit act 1974?

 

The agreement in the way it is laid out falls well short on a compliant agreement.

 

For your reference the payment protection insurance needs to be included in total charge for credit and not the amount of credit

.

As the agreement is in two parts, the conditional sale and credit agreement, as they have been linked, the true cost of the vehicle has been overstated. This puts the debtor at a disadvantage should he/she wish to do a voluntary termination on the vehicle.

 

I now draw your attention again to the meaning of amount of credit.

 

This is the difference between the cash price of the vehicle and any advance deposit.

 

Might I suggest you look at s.9 (4) of the consumer credit act 1974 for clarity?

 

Now as the price of the deposit was added to the insurance and not the credit agreement (car)

 

The cost of finance to the debtor has increased in the conditional sale agreement (car finance)

 

I WILL NOW EXPLAIN IN CRYSTAL CLEAR ENGLISH

 

1/ ANY DEPOSIT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE CREDIT AGREEMENT/INSURANCE AND NOT FOR WHAT IT WAS INTENDED FOR.

THAT WOULD BE THE CONDITIONAL SALE PART OF THE AGREEMENT

 

2/ THE DEPOSIT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE AMOUNT OF CREDIT ON THE INSURANCE

 

3/ BY DOING THIS, THE TOTAL FIGURE REPAYABLE ON THE CONDITIONAL SALE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN MISSTATED, PUTTING THE DEBTOR AT A DISADVANTAGE IF HE/SHE WISHES TO DO A VOLUNTARY TERMINATION.

 

IN SIMPLE SPEAK

 

THE TOTAL CHARGE FOR CREDIT AND AMOUNT OF CREDIT HAS BEEN MISSTATED.

 

May I suggest looking at s.90 of the consumer credit act on termination and payments of a third?

 

THIS ALSO IS PREJUDICIAL IN THE ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE WHICH TO WILL BE MISSTATED AND BEING A PRESCRIBED TERM, MAKES THE AGREEMENT UNENFORCEABLE.

 

Please do not insult my intelligence by stating its In the terms and conditionslink3.giflink3.gif] which I signed and agreed to. That is unless you consider a contractual agreement is binding and the consumer credit act is not.

 

 

I require a final response as to either issue an N1 claim and allow me to enter a defencelink3.giflink3.gif] or close down this account.

 

 

 

yours faithfully

xxxxx

 

when you get the agreement i want you to send this to godebt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I know I haven't posted on this thread for a very long time, but so much has being going on I haven't had a chance. I did send a CCA letter to GoDebt and received a reply. They also continued to harrass me at work and unfortunately rang my mother and got my new mobile number from her and also harrassed me on that. They then served a Statutory Demand to my work address. The man who delivered it to my work address apparently waited in Reception for over an hour, I wasn't available at the time, before being thrown out by security. I thought they weren't allowed to harrass you at work? They were obviously trying to make contact with me before this became Statute Barred.Anyway finally GoDebt did take the matter to court and I now have an attachment of earnings for £100 a month for a total sum of £6257.09 (this is for the original sum of £2,212 owing plus interest) and a CCJ on my credit file. The Claim form from Cardiff Counnty Court stated that the issue date as 6 June 2011 and the Date of Service was 9 June 2011, although I received it on 8 June 2011 so how is this possible?Is there anyway I can get this judgement put aside or still dispute it? I am trying to rent a private property and this CCJ is proving a real nightmare. Also having looked at a copy of the orignial contract I signed it on 2 April 2001, the actual date I went to Yes Car Credit and purchased the vehicle and therefore signed all the paperwork, but the date of signature by DAF is 5 April 2001. Also the deposit I paid was taken off of the insurance payments and I have been charged interest on these insurances.I appreciate any advice to try and get this matter resolved. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you fight this in court ? Did you bring up the issue with missold insurance ? misplaced deposit ? and why did you leave it so long to set aside ?

 

I did reply to Cardiff Court with a counterclaim, but I never received a response to this, so not sure whether this was ever received. The next thing I received was notification from Slough County Court regarding an attachment of earnings being made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that as this has already been to court that you speak to solicitors called stephensons, they know yes car credit and godebt and have had a lot of success in getting set asides etc...however. they are not always able to help, though they are worth a try...you could try to get a set aside on the case if you did honestly put in a counter claim and it was ignored or you never had any paperwork returned informing you of when the case was being held..though as 42man has already asked why have you left it so long to apply for set aside?....there is a real issue regarding the contract that yes used as it put the debtor in a poor position by misstating the amount of credit that was given...this was especially so when the deposit was used against the insurance..and of course the old story that ycc gave everyone... you cant have the car without the insurances....was one that we have heard nearly every time that ycc and godebt have reared their ugly head...that said now they have an order to get the money it is not going to be easy to get this set aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that as this has already been to court that you speak to solicitors called stephensons, they know yes car credit and godebt and have had a lot of success in getting set asides etc...however. they are not always able to help, though they are worth a try...you could try to get a set aside on the case if you did honestly put in a counter claim and it was ignored or you never had any paperwork returned informing you of when the case was being held..though as 42man has already asked why have you left it so long to apply for set aside?....there is a real issue regarding the contract that yes used as it put the debtor in a poor position by misstating the amount of credit that was given...this was especially so when the deposit was used against the insurance..and of course the old story that ycc gave everyone... you cant have the car without the insurances....was one that we have heard nearly every time that ycc and godebt have reared their ugly head...that said now they have an order to get the money it is not going to be easy to get this set aside

 

Thanks, could you provide me with Stephensons contact details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...