Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes 85% of people think DCA's are BAILIFFS and wet themselves because they WRONGLY think they can come a knocking and take your stuff away sadly. when in all truth they never can be and have NO legal powers whatsoever. dx
    • Just circling back with a thanks and an apology.   Apologies because, I honestly thought I'd replied to thank everyone and update, but turns out I hadn't. Sorry. So first of all, a big big thanks to the Forum and all those that helped me on this thread, especially @dx100uk and @AndyOrch. The work you do is awesome and I'm sure I'm only one of many who are extremely grateful for your support. So, in terms of a belated update, Moriarty withdrew, well they said ADCB did. So that's a result. Whilst that was a few years back, I still get emails from odd 'agents' locally in UAE - usually at a weekend - or reminders from ADCB. The sums offered by the agents for a settlement are a fraction of the sums that were claimed - like 75% less - so one would presume if one wished to settle, dealing direct with ADCB may be even less. If it helps anyone, what I would say is this. 1) Listen to the advice from the trusted sources on here. They know their onions. 2) It can seem overwhelming to a layman with all this legal jargon, but don't let it scare you. Just take it a step at a time, listen and learn as much as you can from other threads, and trust the process. 3) I was surprised how shambolic Moriarty appeared to be in my case. Don't ever think the other party is above you in terms of knowledge, experience or how they will conduct themselves. Whilst it was during the pandemic, even on the remote calls with the court, in one instance Moriarty didn't even bother attending the call. In other instances, they didn't reply to certain requests I made via court process. Finally, they just give up the ghost, and a few years later I received confirmation of discontinuance. I'm not saying my experience is/was/may be typical, but what I took from it was it simply came down to brinksmanship and them playing the percentages on their part. Play the long game, take good advice, there's nothing to be scared off and if it's anything like my situation, you may well win the day. The longer things went on, the more you will feel you're on the right side. Especially once it gets into all the process, form submission and involvement of the court, stick to your guns and follow the advice.  It's nothing scientific, but if every case was like mine, it seems like these folks have the view that at some point, the defendant will crumble and give in, through fear or otherwise, so it's important to stay brave and keep pushing forward because the further you go, the more it will tilt in your favour. Play a straight bat and the long game. I've now come back to post due to another situation, different debt, and will start a new thread in due course.   So keep your chins up, fight the good fight and good luck to all, and sincere thanks for all the help.  
    • The NTK needs to be redacted, your VRN is still showing.
    • Hi, yes they swapped over after a brief period when the bank were sending something over.
    • Fair enough. But I don't understand why they send these letters. Do people really get scared and end up paying them?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sue V Capital One.....or Lowell Finance?!


dollies01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a capital one card in 2001, I dont think its been in action since 2002

I had heard nothing until about six weeks ago when I had a letter from Capt one saying they had defaulted the debt and passed it onto Lowell Financial.

Two days later I had a letter from Lowell Financial saying that I owed £577

On the 10th August I sent Lowell Financial a CCA letter

Today (12th September) I have recieved a copy of my "short application form 5188"

There is NO statement of account, or anything else except for a covering letter..........this isnt right is it?

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring Lowell and say you dispute the amount and that you require evidence of the amount you owe due to the long period of account inactivity. They have to give a months grace to you which should buy you some time. Also put in a request to Capital One for statements (i take it your planning a claim). Its Capital One you make any claim against.

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the cca letter it states

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a cheque made out for a £1 2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists.

 

A statement of account, surely would be the same as statements from Capital One?

 

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine so, sorry I missed the CCA letter bit. Teach me to read things properly. You need to write a letter to Capital One's Executive Office and dispute the amount you owe. Ask them to provide evidence e.g. statements. Also ring and write to Lowell and say the account is in dispute so they are off your back for a month. When you get the statements dispute the amount again if you have charges that you can reclaim and send off a pre-lim letter etc etc.

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I think maybe I'm not being very clear in what I'm saying

My points is

Lowell finance have failed to supply all the documents required to complete a cca?

or have they?

Im sure a mod will be along to set me straight soon!

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what your saying but my post was based on your need to sort out your debt recovery problem first? you don't want court action against you after all.

 

Your agreement was with Capital One and not the debt company, thats just who the debt has been sold onto. So shouldn't your CCA letter have gone to Cap One?. I may be wrong lets hope someone can help.

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Another letter from Lowell finance came this morning.

No mention of the cca request

Just saying that despite prevous attempts they still have not reached a resolution to the outstanding balance..

They wont be either, until they fulfil this obligation!

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt sound right to me, its at least not everything that you asked them for..

 

Lowells are a vile bunch of scumbags...I wouldnt trust them.

 

Go here... DEBT HELP UK FORUM - Login

 

for help with your query, they helped me with a case with Lowell and in fact it was the guys at the Debt Help forum that led me to this place.

 

They're all really nice and they'll be able to tell you what Lowell need to provide you with :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

And yet another letter recieved today!

They are sending an agent to collect payment (yea right!)

I rang but they wouldnt take my call as I refused to give them my telephone number, so I emailed the following instead:

I have rung your offices this morning, but was told my phone call could not be continued, as I refused to give my telephone number.

 

I was ringing to remind you that despite the fact that the above mentioned account is in dispute, you are still harrassing me for payment,

this is unlawful.

You have failed to respond sufficiently to my cca request, as merely sending a signed copy of an application form, does not prove any debt.

I will not enter into any discussion with you regarding this matter, until such times as both you and capital one provide details for the cca request and subject access data, respectively.

 

I trust this clarifys my position.

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

And yet another letter recieved today!

They are sending an agent to collect payment (yea right!)

 

I rang but they wouldnt take my call as I refused to give them my telephone number, so I emailed the following instead:

I have rung your offices this morning, but was told my phone call could not be continued, as I refused to give my telephone number.

 

I was ringing to remind you that despite the fact that the above mentioned account is in dispute, you are still harrassing me for payment,

this is unlawful.

You have failed to respond sufficiently to my cca request, as merely sending a signed copy of an application form, does not prove any debt.

I will not enter into any discussion with you regarding this matter, until such times as both you and capital one provide details for the cca request and subject access data, respectively.

 

I trust this clarifys my position.

 

Ok dollies I just found this thread,

 

Your CCA request should provide a copy of the signed and executed credit agreement, a statement of account ( which may just be a balance statement) and any other document mentioned in the agreement. After 12 working days Lowell are in default and after a further 30 calendar days the commit an offence and the debt is unenforceable until a court enforces it, which is unlikely without the proper paperwork. They are NOT entitled to enforce the debt while they are in default.

 

if anyone calls at your house get their name and ideally take a photo of them ( your mobile is good) The account is in dispute and a home visit is clearly harasement. a photo will be good evidence in court.

 

You have made your CCA request to Lowells and they are obliged to provide that information whether they are the original creditor or not.

 

They stopped the phone call because it meant they couldn't get your number so they couldn't make harassing phone calls to you.

 

From my calculations they are no longer able to enforce the debt without a court order, so write to them and tell them that their allowed time to reply under the CCA has now expired and that any attempts to enforce it will result in litigation. The application form is not a credit agreement. The agreement has to stipulate that it is a credit agreement regulated under the CCA 1974 and must also tell you that you have a cooling off period.

  • Confused 1

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to include in the last post that the DCA is required to supply the information whether they are the original creditor or not under section 189 of the CCA.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

statements arrived this morning, along with a letter of apology (kinda) from Lowell for harrassing me!

Total for unlawful charges is £ 366

amount outstanding on accout £577

If my claim goes to court there will be about £80 left for me to pay

much better ! lol

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

statements arrived this morning, along with a letter of apology (kinda) from Lowell for harrassing me!

 

Total for unlawful charges is £ 366

 

amount outstanding on accout £577

 

If my claim goes to court there will be about £80 left for me to pay

 

much better ! lol

 

I think by the time you add up the interest since 2002 Dollies their will be even less than £80 left to pay:D

 

I assume as they have sold this onto Lowell then a default notice has also been issued. I would include removal of that in your claim as well as its obvious the default amount is going to be less than the amount they owe you. :lol:

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi there people well iam new to the forum well how i found this site is i had a capital one card when at college in 2003 i had no statements or nothing from capital one then about 3-4 weeks i got a debt leter from lowell financial 575£ so i made a few payments then today i got a letter saying the are offering me 50% of my debt i have never herd of this can anyone explain

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there people well iam new to the forum well how i found this site is i had a capital one card when at college in 2003 i had no statements or nothing from capital one then about 3-4 weeks i got a debt leter from lowell financial 575£ so i made a few payments then today i got a letter saying the are offering me 50% of my debt i have never herd of this can anyone explain

thanks

 

Firstly John start a new thread of your own so you don't hijack this thread, plus it makes it easier for us to keep track of your case and advise you better.

 

Yes I have seen this tactic beforefrom Capital ! and MBNA.

 

Basically they are saying that if you send them a certain percentage of the debt then they will cancel the balance. be warned though that this does not mean the debt is written off, it will be marked as settled but with an amount outstanding.

 

It looking like MBNA and Cap 1 are trying anything at the moment to reduce the amounts outstanding to them.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any update lately Dollies ?

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea Tam

I had a letter from Capital one in reply to my preliminary, saying the normal rubbish about eight weeks etc, there Lba is due at the end of the week.

I had yet another letter, this morning from those slighty inept lot aka

Lowell finance saying that the debt has been passed to the pre - litigation dept, I have sent them yet another letter, (not very polite and with no holes barred!)

Congratulations on your promotion btw

You deffo deserve it!

Halifax settled

Halifax (again) settled

Nationwide settled

Natwest settled

Don't forget to donate to this site, they gave us the backbone to put up a fight, we've learnt how to reclaim our rights and proved banks are all nothing but........ rubbish <wink>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea Tam

 

I had a letter from Capital one in reply to my preliminary, saying the normal rubbish about eight weeks etc, there Lba is due at the end of the week.

 

I had yet another letter, this morning from those slighty inept lot aka

Lowell finance saying that the debt has been passed to the pre - litigation dept, I have sent them yet another letter, (not very polite and with no holes barred!)

 

Congratulations on your promotion btw

You deffo deserve it!

 

keep with your schedule dollies, your almost certainly going to have to issue MCOL on it but they seem to defend by making full payment. They just settled onbe I did for my ex wife in exactly the same way as they settled my claim a few weeks ago.

 

Thanks very much for the congrats, just hope I can live up to it now :D

 

Not sure that pink suits me though lol.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...