Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Do I make a small monthly offer? Lloyds TSB


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, this is quite a long running saga and I have had some great advice on here, however after a 4 month period of not hearing anything I now have a letter from Lloyds, after paying BLS for over 10 years and getting passed on to Moorcroft as I didn't pay for about 12 months I have now been passed back to Lloyds.

 

My question to you good people is do I make an offer of a small monthly payment or do I carry on ignoring? although I do worry a bit about the latter!

 

Many thanks and this is a link to my other posts if you want a catch up!

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?281392-Moorcroft-Debt-Recovery-Limited-What-do-you-think&p=3339760&highlight=#post3339760

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so have you actually ever requested the agreement by means of a CCA, because it does not appear from your previous thread that you have, and if morecroft offered a discount then chances are there is no viable agreement to be had

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to CCA them make sure you update the template in the library to include bits of CPUTR 2008 so they know you know what you're on about. However, you're still on very dodgy ground nowadays as many courts are upholding reconstituted agreements even when no original exists. It is worth finding out and then using other tactics to nail them down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry my thread didn't appear to include the long saga. I have written and sent £1 requesting a CCA a good few months ago. BLS took the pound off the o/s debt and said words to the effect of that they didn't have the originla agreement and it was unreasonable to expect them to have it after so many years.

 

I don't really know the best course of action, I have sat it out up to now but I really don't know how long I will have the bottle for!!

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you. Do I need to send a pound again? Also should I mention that there is PPI on this loan which if it came off would thankfully reduce it slightly? I have not written to Lloyds at all but have sent letters to BLS, using templates from another cagger so should I just send the same letters that I sent to BLS?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh lovely! PPI, and misappropriation of funds!

 

First send the account in dispute letter as advised, also demand they return the £1 postal order as they cannot provide the CCA you requested, also that their fraudulent misappropriation of that postal order has been reported to the OFT&TS and the FOS, they are to send you their complaints procedure by return of post.

 

The PPI, if that didn't kick in and cover you which is what it is supposed to do, then reclaim ALL of it, including interest, at THEIR rate, this will then offset the total they are saying is owed.

 

Until they can produce a CCA they get NOTHING.:hand:

  • Confused 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little rusty as to PPI reclaims, but, I don't think there is a specific template.

 

With regard to the £ postal order that is simply a letter demanding them to return the money or face further action. It specifically states in the CCA request what this postal order is to be used for.

If they cannot send you your request, then they MUST return the fee, if they still fail to return it, send them a Letter Before Action (LBA) but I strongly doubt there will be any need for that.

However you MUST report them to the OFT&TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact for the misappropriation of the statutory fee.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Account / Policy number: 123456789

 

I have been looking at my agreement with you, reference above and have noted that I purchased Payment Protection Insurance from you.

I am now of the belief that I was mis-sold this policy due to.............

 

Continue writing with details of which issues apply to you, rather than just listing the issue. Expand on details where applicable.

 

The main issues are

 

  • Employment Issues
  • Medical Issues
  • General Health Issues
  • Lender Issues
  • Single Premium Issues
  • Policy Cancellation Issues
  • General Issues

What I expect from you is justification that the policy was suitable for me based on my circumstances and an explanation as to how your suitability criteria works. If you cannot justify this to my satisfaction I request a full refund of all premiums paid to date as well as interest on these payments.

As I believe I have been deprived of this money I also expect an interest element to be added to each sum, at a suitable rate and using a suitable calculation method, as a compensatory gesture.

 

In respect of cancellation of a policy may I draw your attention to the following reports from the FSA, namely, 'The sale of payment protection insurance - results of thematic work, November 2005' & 'The Sale of Payment Protection Insurance - results of follow-up thematic work, October 2006'' that state "When consumers cancel the PPI without repaying the loan, some firms will need to reissue the loan without the PPI. Firms should ensure they treat their customers fairly in relation to the terms on which they reissue the loan.". This means that any new loan is on the same or better terms and does not detriment me in any way and that this is to be done without making a new search on my credit file

 

I expect a swift response to this letter within 14 days, containing either your full justification or notice that you will be refunding these payments.

 

If I do not receive a satisfactory response I will issue another letter notifying you of my intention to take further action if the matter is not resolved within a further 14 days. After this limit has passed I will be either contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate my complaint or issuing court proceedings.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Signature

 

Name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tingy and everyone else for your replies, I will be writing to Lloyds with your draft letter, however even though I do have the original agreement regarding PPI should I tell them I have this agreement?! the reason I ask is that will they not then say that if I have the agreement it is enforceable?!

 

I probably don't actually know or understand what I am talking about really and I apologise if I this question is a bit daft!

 

Thank you x

Link to post
Share on other sites

No don't tell them, you want them to refund you the PPI that they added to your account, including interest, that is all your asking for at the moment.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

99.9% oof the time the ppi is a different policy, often with a different company, to the agreement. The fact that you say you have your ppi agreement would suggest this is the case with you. As a different agreement it is separate to the original agreement so cannot prove whether or not that is enforceable. You are however acknowledging it existed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, how does this sound? If it gets your seal of approval it will be posted forth with!! Can't believe my first letter to BLS was dated 17th March 2010....how time flies :!:

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Account / Policy number: 123456789

With reference to your letter dated 10 March 2011 on the above account.

I am now of the belief that I was mis-sold a PPI policy in respect of this account due to the fact I did not ask for thiscover due to my employment being secure enough to cover any payments should I become ill.

 

What I expect from you is justification that the policy was suitable for me based on my circumstances and an explanation as to how your suitability criteria works. If you cannot justify this to my satisfaction I request a full refund of all premiums paid to date as well as interest on these payments.

As I believe I have been deprived of this money I also expect an interest element to be added to each sum, at a suitable rate and using a suitable calculation method, as a compensatory gesture.

 

In respect of cancellation of a policy may I draw your attention to the following reports from the FSA, namely, 'The sale of payment protection insurance - results of thematic work, November 2005' & 'The Sale of Payment Protection Insurance - results of follow-up thematic work, October 2006'' that state "When consumers cancel the PPI without repaying the loan, some firms will need to reissue the loan without the PPI. Firms should ensure they treat their customers fairly in relation to the terms on which they reissue the loan.". This means that any new loan is on the same or better terms and does not detriment me in any way and that this is to be done without making a new search on my credit file.

 

 

I expect a swift response to this letter within 14 days, containing either your full justification or notice that you will be refunding these payments.

 

If I do not receive a satisfactory response I will issue another letter notifying you of my intention to take further action if the matter is not resolved within a further 14 days. After this limit has passed I will be either contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate my complaint or issuing court proceedings.

There is the other issue of a £1 postal order, which was sent to BLS on 17th March 2010 with a covering letter as a formal request for them to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

With regard to the £ postal order it was taken off the balance and was not used for what I requested it for. This is a misappropriation of the statutory fee. I therefore wish this to be returned or face further action. It specifically states in the CCA request what this postal order is to be used for.

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Name

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...