Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell -help needed URGENT-BANKRUPTCY PETITION NOW FILED


RDRR
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4630 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I received a statutory demand from Hamptons Legal/Lowell Portfolio 1 yesterday afternoon, served in person, regarding a Barclaycard account. I'm sending off a CCA request to Lowell and a SAR to Barclaycard today, but is there anything else I need to be doing in the meantime?

 

Assuming Lowell wait the maximum 12+2 days to respond, I'm worried that doesn't leave me much time to then apply for it to be set aside within the 18 day limit.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They knocked on the door. When I answered they said "? I've been asked to give this to you." and that was it. I think they were wearing jeans, certainly no uniform or any kind of ID.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also did they ask to confirm who you were, say anything other than as above?

 

You could start working on your 'set aside' so that it is ready the minute they miss their CCA deadline.

 

Forms for Setting Aside Statutory Demands:

 

 

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-5.pdf

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-4.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well assuming that this person wasn't a court official (and it doesn't sound like it was) or could it have just been a neighbour just dropping it off at your place????

Highly unlikely to have been anyone from Lowells themselves as it would cost them too much in the petrol money and wouldn't be worth their while.

I'm thinking along the lines of "power to contact" maybe???

Anyway - it if wasn't from a court - then it wont have been worth the paper it was printed on.

It wasn't a neighbour. It was almost certainly someone like Power 2 Contact, but regardless it was served correctly and I'm taking it seriously.

 

Also did they ask to confirm who you were, say anything other than as above?

 

You could start working on your 'set aside' so that it is ready the minute they miss their CCA deadline.

 

Forms for Setting Aside Statutory Demands:

 

 

The conversation was literally as quoted above. He mumbled my first name (no surname) as if it was a question, I said yes, he gave me the document and left.

 

Thanks for the links to the forms - I'll make a start.

 

I'm hoping it's just a scare tactic, but the fact that they took the trouble to serve it properly is a little troubling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the serving of it - just start getting your defence ready... I was served via my partner! I was in court just a couple of weeks ago with an SD from Lowells/Hamptons and the Judge I got was brilliant and set it aside - however, you can't always depend on the Judge - previously I had one who was on the side of the creditor... so - I would suggest you do some reading about SD's on here and then prepare your application to have it set aside.

 

One point - once you have been to court and signed your affidavit - make sure to ask the court if you have to send a copy to Lowells/Hamptons! I didn't and the Agent that turned up at Court tried to get it adjourned because of it - luckily, I had a good Judge who dismissed it all because of it being an abuse of process.

 

Good luck

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many, many reasons for a 'set aside' it does not just hinge on whether you owe money or not. An SD is not issued by a Court, it is a document downloaded from the internet, and there are many out there that mis-use it shamelessly to 'frighten' people, and yes, people who owe no money whatsoever!

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can you have a defence, if you actually owe the money? Im in a similar situation but cant think what defence I could have to have it set asid? any ideas or am I getting this wrong?

 

Hello barbara 1950, in response to your question, it isn't so much about whether or not I owe the money so much as whether or not they actually own the debt. My original creditor was a bank... it isn't the bank who were trying to make me bankrupt. My defence hinged around the facts that no copy of my credit card agreement was produced, no default notice was ever issued by the bank and finally, the dca had never sent me a properly drawn up Notice of Assignment - on top of all that, using a Stat Demand is an abuse of process for a matter relating to the CCA 1974 and lucky for me, in my case, the judge made that very clear to the debt collection people and threw the case out of his court with no leave to appeal!

 

If you read around the forum on threads relating to SDs I am sure you will soon see plenty of examples of defences.

 

If you have a case running yourself and would like to see my defence, just let me know and I would be glad to pm you.

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick question about dates and my reasons to set aside...

 

Lowell received my CCA request on March 18th. I was served the SD on the (late) afternoon of March 16th. If I have 18 (calendar?) days to apply for the set aside then that makes my deadline this Monday (4th), at the latest, for the application. However they have 12+2 working days to repsond to the CCA request. By my reckoning this gives them until next Wednesday to respond, i.e. after I have to have the set aside application in. So I'm wondering about my grounds for a set aside, as my paperwork is almost nil on this. I don't have copies of the original agreement or any notice of assignment, which it is possible I was sent (the SD says it was) but I can't lay my hands on.

 

They haven't yet responded to the CCA request, although I have received a response (in the last half hour) to the SAR I sent to Barclaycard. I'll go through that properly shortly, but on a quick first glance it doesn't appear to include an agreement of any kind, signed or not.

 

I have seen several possible set aside defences on this site, but none which cover this situation. I'm not looking for a boilerplate defence, as I appreciate every case is different, but would appreciate any pointers.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Coincidentally, I'm at the court in question next week for jury service. I assume I can just take the set aside forms with me and get them sworn in at the correct court (it's a combined court)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Quick update...

 

I have a hearing for this set for next week. Lowells haven't responded to my CCA request, and I have subsequently sent them an 'in default' letter. The SAR response from Barclaycard didn't contain an agreement of any kind, not even an application form.

 

Is there anything in particular I need to do in preparation for the hearing? I'll be taking copies of any correspondence relating to the SD, but should I have anything else with me?

 

Is there anything else I need to be aware of that might come up at the hearing?

 

Thanks

Edited by RDRR
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes don't forget to submit your costs so that they are in the case file at least 24 hours before the hearing - a useful link here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?211818

 

And if (as I suspect they won't) they don't turn up in court then you should show the judge this... - http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2009/20-09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the reply 42man. I've been vacillating about whether to go for costs or not, having tried to read numerous lengthy threads on the topic, but was wary of doing so as I didn't want to make a misstep. However, having started to digest the thread you kindly linked me to, I'm changing my mind again.

 

I have a couple of questions, the answers to which may well be in the linked thread but I'll list them here anyway...

 

Regarding loss of earnings, I'm a software consultant (working through a Ltd company of which I am sole director) and will lose half a day's rate to attend the hearing. Is this something I can claim for in full, or is there a 'standard' rate that is applied? If I can claim, what proof do I need of my daily rate?

 

I never actually approached a solicitor about defending this, preferring to rely on CAG instead. I therefore have no estimate of potential legal costs, so am I still in a position to try to claim the 2/3 costs? If so, what would be a good figure?

 

I'm unable to get to the court before the hearing. Am I therefore ok to fax/email the costs claim to the court, and if so do I just make it FAO the court clerk/manager?

 

As I said, I'm still reading the other thread so apologies if I'm asking questions that have already been answered.

 

Finally, how would I stand in the unlikely event that they do turn up, and have a signed agreement with them? Is it still likely that the SD would be set aside, given that they ignored the CCA request meaning I had no prior sight of the agreement?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding loss of earnings, I'm a software consultant (working through a Ltd company of which I am sole director) and will lose half a day's rate to attend the hearing. Is this something I can claim for in full, or is there a 'standard' rate that is applied? If I can claim, what proof do I need of my daily rate? - Detail it all in writing, the judge can always say no or reduce it if he thinks it is too much....you don't need to prove what you do, but write in your costs - defenadant is a s/w consultant - paid on an average hourly rate of £35 per hour, I would also claim for £9.25 per hour for your reseaerch into law + postage + mileage (which I think is around 40p per mile)

 

I never actually approached a solicitor about defending this, preferring to rely on CAGlink31.gif instead. I therefore have no estimate of potential legal costs, so am I still in a position to try to claim the 2/3 costs? If so, what would be a good figure? - (I had heard you can claim this but, i'm not knowledgable enough to advise)

 

I'm unable to get to the court before the hearing. Am I therefore ok to fax/email the costs claim to the court, and if so do I just make it FAO the court clerk/manager? - Yes you can fax through to tthe court, but if you do just ring the court to make sure they have received it

 

As I said, I'm still reading the other thread so apologies if I'm asking questions that have already been answered.

 

Finally, how would I stand in the unlikely event that they do turn up, and have a signed agreement with them? Is it still likely that the SD would be set asidelink3.gif, given that they ignored the CCA request meaning I had no prior sight of the agreement? - If for any reason they do do this then you simply say that this is the first sight of it and you would like the judge to order the claimant to provide, statements for the duration of the agreement, complete list of charges applied to the account, default notices, termination notices, deed of assignment and notices of assignment + details of any PPI policies that were in place, and if it isn't going your way then request an adjournment to review....but (on the proviso that the judge orders the other side to provide a full portfolio as above)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never actually approached a solicitor about defending this, preferring to rely on CAG instead. I therefore have no estimate of potential legal costs, so am I still in a position to try to claim the 2/3 costs? If so, what would be a good figure?

 

Quite a few people misunderstand this point.

 

You can only claim the LIP rate for the time you spend researching etc and any other losses/expenses that you actually incurred. For example, losing a days pay when attending court and costs of travelling and postage etc.

 

Where the two thirds bit comes in is that is the maximum that you are allowed to claim, regardless of the amount of time that you spend on this. So, even if you were to spend 500 hours researching this and were able to prove it you would still not get more than two thirds of what a solicitor would charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, thanks again 42man. I think I'll stick with the loss of earnings etc and not push my luck with 2/3 solicitors fees. And if I do get it set aside and am awarded costs, I hope I can find the staying power of HighFly in the other thread in order to actually collect them! :-)

 

Edit: Ah, just seen the post above - thanks for the clarification.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim your costs, the worst a judge can say is no...

Done! Emailed a PDF to the court and they have acknowledged it. I'll post an update after the hearing next week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'm just back from a very frustrating hearing...

 

Even though Lowells have defaulted on the CCA request, and as expected didn't bother to turn up at the hearing, in the judge's opinion they are within their rights to make the demand so she dismissed my application to set it aside. She acknowledged that they will be unable to obtain judgement without the agreement, but apparently the OFT guidelines are clear that this doesn't prevent them making the demand in the first place.

 

I got the impression from the start that the judge wasn't particularly 'on side', and she even went as far as to say, and I quote, "you know you borrowed the money", and suggested I contact Lowells to make arrangements to pay in installments. I'm obviously not keen to do this but I'm unsure as to what my next move should be, if any. Is there a way I can make Lowells 'put up or shut up' regarding whether or not they actually have a valid agreement? I suppose the alternative is to just wait and see if they make another move, but I'd rather stay on the offensive if possible as I just want this done and dusted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...