Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as predicted relieved dq from Overdale.  Checked MCOL transaction history. Last entry is defence received.  Am I reading that correctly?   my understanding is I I ignore and wait for courts to send one
    • So as predicted a dq was received from Overdale  iv checked MCOL transaction history and the last thing on there is defence received   No dq sent by courts. Am I reading this correctly.    my understanding is I ignore the dq and wait for the courts to send one? So as predicted a dq was received from Overdale  iv checked MCOL transaction history and the last thing on there is defence received   No dq sent by courts. Am I reading this correctly.    my understanding is I ignore the dq and wait for the courts to send one? So as predicted a dq was received from Overdale  iv checked MCOL transaction history and the last thing on there is defence received   No dq sent by courts. Am I reading this correctly.    my understanding is I ignore the dq and wait for the courts to send one? So as predicted a dq was received from Overdale  iv checked MCOL transaction history and the last thing on there is defence received   No dq sent by courts. Am I reading this correctly.    my understanding is I ignore the dq and wait for the courts to send one?
    • Hi  I've received letters acknowledging that overdales have received my caa request and CPR request. No info. I'm going to post you my defence for to look at tonight or tomorrow morning. H
    • Morning,  I have recieved a reply from my request for information. They have replied with the credit agreements for my 118 loan and two Captial One cards.  They have said thay as Vodafone is a telecommunications account it is not regulated so the original creditor is not obliged to provide a copy of the agreement.  What are my next steps?  Thank you 
    • Treasury rubbishes Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax hike election TV debate claim   I see Sunak and his crew have been shown to be liars at the first outing, including lying about what senior civil servants have said (all on top of Sunak trying to deflect some their own DEFINED budget black hole onto labour) No surprises there then Treasury rubbishes Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax hike election TV debate claim WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK In a humiliating moment in the election for the prime minister, a scathing letter from top Treasury officials revealed that the figures...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fairfax Solicitors and Max Recovery Limited


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I wonder if someone can give me some advice. My boyfriend has received a letter, it was passed on via his old address about 2.5 years ago, so they don't have his new address.

The letter came from Fairfax Solicitors on behalf of their clients Max Recovery Limited. He has never heard of them before, and it states that he owes this Max Recovery over £5k. It's really bizarre and we're not sure what to do. I was thinking of sending these so called Solicitors a letter but then again I don't want them to have my address, my boyfriend knows nothing about it, it's weird. If he calls them then from reading other people's answers to this sort of thing that's the worst thing he can do, they'll then continue to send letters to his old address.

 

Is it wise to ignore it?

 

I'd much appreciate some advice on this.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welocome to CAG

 

Yes, ignore it. It is probably a phishing letter for someone with the same name.

 

What I would do though is get a copy of your credit file to make sure they haven't slipped a dodgy default against your bf

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thank you for getting back to me so quickly. I think thats the best idea too. He hasn't got the best credit rating, I'm pretty spot on when it comes to finances, so kind of really helped him organise his money better.

Any debts he has he is paying and always been up to date and in control so this is just weird. The more i read about this mob on forums the more it convinces me for him just to ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi there, I am not very good at navigating around this site and not sure how to start a new thread.

 

My other half has had another debt creep up on him, he has forgotten about a lot of it due to illness.

 

The latest is from Amex although the letter has came through their Solicitor.

 

I have had to take control of it, although they think all correspondence is from him, via letter.

They called him at his place of work originally but I told him to make sure they don't do that again and proceed via letter.

 

He asked for proof of the debt, statements etc and they sent copies of the statements and the original application.

There doesn't appear to be a page about PPI etc, which I thought was odd, usually there is a box re insurance, should we request this?

 

Also they keep sending letters with the amount going up and up, it shows no interest rate etc, they just keep saying interest continues to run.

 

They sent out a form for him to fill in declaring his salary etc.

We sent it back stating what he earns, he has a mountain of debt that he is paying off which he does so very well, but it takes up a lot of his salary.

He doesn't own any home or car, in fact he lives with me and has pretty much nowt.

 

We put on the form that he pays rent to a friend.

 

He offered to pay an amount every month but say that Amex have not accepted this until he provides proof of his earnings and a list of creditors and payments to them?

 

It seems so personal, does he have to do this?

 

We also asked for details of the balance transfer, the amount on the statement looks like it was transferred originally from another account, he can't remember.

 

They have given us two numbers, the long ones, but we have no idea where these are from.

 

What should we do now?

 

Should we send a copy of his wage slip and a list of all the debts he is paying?

 

Many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to say, been reading through so many different threads, this is a fantastic site and really helping a lot of people out there. What i find amazing is that when a lot of people are quite eager and happy to pay debts and manage them, lawyers and debt recovery companies go about it in such a horrible way, the way they word letters is quite threatening! :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i were you i would send a sar and a cca request to try and confirm this debt. Do you know how old it is or when the last payment was made?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Hi I wonder if someone can give me some advice. My boyfriend has received a letter, it was passed on via his old address about 2.5 years ago, so they don't have his new address.

The letter came from Fairfax Solicitors on behalf of their clients Max Recovery Limited. He has never heard of them before, and it states that he owes this Max Recovery over £5k. It's really bizarre and we're not sure what to do. I was thinking of sending these so called Solicitors a letter but then again I don't want them to have my address, my boyfriend knows nothing about it, it's weird. If he calls them then from reading other people's answers to this sort of thing that's the worst thing he can do, they'll then continue to send letters to his old address.

 

Is it wise to ignore it?

 

I'd much appreciate some advice on this.

 

Many thanks

Okay, Max Recovery buy bad debts from banks and other financial institutions really cheap and then chase it up and get whatever they can from it. If they have sent you a letter then chances are that your boyfriend has a credit card or other debt that he has forgotten about. He really needs to contact them and get it sorted out. If he doesn't it won't go away but will be hanging around forever and his credit rating will never have any chance of improving. It's tough but it sounds like he's trying to sort his problems so if he is, he should sort them all.

 

Good luck with it all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it won't go away but will be hanging around forever and his credit rating will never have any chance of improving.

 

Good luck with it all!

???

Assuming it really IS his debt in the first place (it may not be those guys like phishing!) his credit file will be exactly the same whether he responds or not! Recorded defaults drop off after 6 years regardless! If it was his debt & it was recorded it would stay even if he started making payments so not much point really…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, Max Recovery buy bad debts from banks and other financial institutions really cheap and then chase it up and get whatever they can from it. If they have sent you a letter then chances are that your boyfriend has a credit card or other debt that he has forgotten about. He really needs to contact them and get it sorted out. If he doesn't it won't go away but will be hanging around forever and his credit rating will never have any chance of improving. It's tough but it sounds like he's trying to sort his problems so if he is, he should sort them all.

 

Good luck with it all!

 

please ignore this post.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ANY debt you are paying or thinking of paying

SHOULD show on his CRA file

 

any debt that DOES NOT

 

you SERIOUSLY need to question WHY you are paying it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

they are no diff to any other 'fake' for hire solicitor.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...