Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Comet ignores obligation under Sale of Goods Act


briloujica
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I should be interested to hear other experiences regarding Comet and faulty goods when outside their 12 months warranty. My experience is that without an extended warranty they attempt to wriggle out of any responsibility, even when there is strong evidence that a manufacturing fault is present. Having been contacted by and agreed with Trading Standards that I should obtain a specialist 3rd party opinion (at my expense) to indicate a manufacturing fault, they have then chosen to dispute the evidence and refuse to discuss the matter further. I should be interested to hear of others who have had similar problems with Comet. It has been strongly recommended by some consumer gurus such as Martin Lewis that extended warranties aren't worth the money, but if multiple retailers like Comet refuse to accept their legal responsibilities outside 12 months, perhaps there's a case for buying these warranties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Seems Comet ignore the sale of goods act regardless of the age of the item.

See my post about Comet refusing to exchange machine.

 

I have sent them requests quoting the sale of goods act and item not fit for pupose etc. Just been ignored and fobbed off.

 

I was surprised to hear from their engineer yesterday that it is apparently company policy, when you ring the service center, to get rid of customers asap in order to increase their call volume. Also taking a video of a fault is NOT in their opinion evidence of a fault!

 

Says a lot for Comet!!

 

I have now written to the managing director with my complaint as consumer direct say my next move should be to sue, but that will cost me money.

 

I contacted the company that cover their extended warranties to enquire if a defect which was there from day 1 would be covered under the extended warranty, when the guarantee expired and they would not tell me, just told me to take out an expensive 5 year extended warranty now! machine is only 5 months old. Of course I refused as I still have manufacturers guarantee. Why pay big bucks to increase their profits when you don't need to.

 

I will not be using Comet again, I am totally disgusted with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Comet Response
I should be interested to hear other experiences regarding Comet and faulty goods when outside their 12 months warranty. My experience is that without an extended warranty they attempt to wriggle out of any responsibility, even when there is strong evidence that a manufacturing fault is present. Having been contacted by and agreed with Trading Standards that I should obtain a specialist 3rd party opinion (at my expense) to indicate a manufacturing fault, they have then chosen to dispute the evidence and refuse to discuss the matter further. I should be interested to hear of others who have had similar problems with Comet. It has been strongly recommended by some consumer gurus such as Martin Lewis that extended warranties aren't worth the money, but if multiple retailers like Comet refuse to accept their legal responsibilities outside 12 months, perhaps there's a case for buying these warranties.

 

Hi briloujica

 

I was sorry to learn of the problems you have experienced.

 

We responded to you on a different forum regarding this matter, requesting that you e-mail into us so that we could look into this issue further for you. Unfortunately, we have not had any further contact from you.

 

If you would like further assistance regarding this matter, please e-mail into us using the link below.

 

http://comet.custhelp.com/app/ask

 

When you e-mail in, please quote the reference 140113 or 131233.

 

Thanks

 

Chris from Comet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems to me from wat ive read and the dealings have had with comet is they love taking your money but as soon as they do thats it , customer relations go's to the dogs .... getting your money back becomes a dirty word. And the long and short of it is they dont seen to give a monkeys, maybe this is how big bussiness works these days, bull**** your way to making a sale then if the goods are faulty tell the customer in no uncertain terms to get lossed ..

 

seem to be a real nice company to buy from which me and my friends arent gonna be making the mistake of buying from in the future!!:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know many people like you who have been sickened by Comet over the years and refuse to buy from them. I just find it amazing they stay in business. I shall certainly never ever buy anything from them again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know many people like you who have been sickened by Comet over the years and refuse to buy from them. I just find it amazing they stay in business. I shall certainly never ever buy anything from them again.

 

Add me to the list also

There are 10 kinds of people in the world:

Those who understand binary and those who don't.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Comet Response

Hi briloujica

 

It doesn't appear we have received any further feedback from you regarding this matter. If you do need anymore assistance, please feel free to contact us again using the following link.

 

http://comet.custhelp.com/app/ask

 

Please also quote the reference number ‘131233’ or '140113'

 

 

Thanks

 

Chris from Comet

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi just thought I would add my experience . I bought a Goodmans TV from Comet at the end of December 2008. 9 months ago it developed a fault where the screen slowly became distorted and unable to watch after about an hour. I thought at the time there was nothing I could do except get it repaired at my own cost. Then by chance I read about a similar fault with a Goodmans TV in the same time frame from date of purchase, the owner with the help of a popular magazine managed to finally get the TV replaced under the sale of goods act.

 

I didn't bother to read the sales of goods act at the time and I rang Comet, the representative told me it was nothing to do with them at this stage I must go to the manufacturer. Goodmans, now Part of Havard International PLC are very good at hiding the contact details even if you call the 0871 number 9 months trying to get any sense out of them ... Finally I decided to read the Sale of goods act and was annoyed to see it is the retailers responsibility.. So I called Comet again, this time I was told that before they would even consider my claim I would need to pay them £69 for an inspection, I asked was this money refunded if the problem was covered under the Sale of Goods act and I was told no and what made it worse was I got the impression from tone of the person this was a nice little earner for Comet that would be a waste of my money.

 

So I have my receipt for the TV, I have a photo of the screen, I have a copy of the article from the magazine, I will send this to Comet.

 

I have contacted the magazine mentioned earlier to prime them in case of the expected and they are interest. So I will send this to them and lets see what happens.

 

I will report the results of my experience here as well via the magazine .

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phil ,

 

The main problem you have here is the time scale that has passed since you purchased the product , it is now nearly 3 years old and as such has not been examined by either COMET the retailer or an independent engineer regarding the nature of the fault.

In either case a fee would be charged for this inspection.

 

This has been ongoing for 1 year since you Tv faulted , even after 2 years COMET would be within their rights to charge for an engineers inspection , however this fee may or may not be greatly reduced had you taken the product to one of their Retail Stores.

 

The onus I am afraid is for you to prove that the product has had an inherent fault since purchase , this is where it gets very muddy as even a court would deem that the Tv has worked okay for 3 years as there is no documented evidence to suggest otherwise.

 

However if it was found there is a major component fault for example the Lcd screen you may have grounds to pursue the retailer for some sort of redress.

 

Much is said on forums regarding warrantys ect being a waste of money but in many cases they have proved their worth regarding getting the product repaired or replaced for the customer.

 

Trying to get some kind of of positive action from a retailer regarding a 3 Year old Tv can be very long and drawn out and will certainly not be solved overnight.

Just look at some of the posts on this forum regarding customers with U/G products and 5 year breakdown cover to see what I mean.

 

COMET were totally wrong in telling you to contact the manufacturer regarding any complaint in the first instance and no doubt would completely deny this as the issue is with the retailer as they well know.

 

However that is a wild goose chase as there is no chance your Tv was made by HARVARD INTERNATIONAL PLC.

 

GOODMANS is a "WHITE LABEL "Badge used by COMET which they put on the front of many of their Tvs which are manufactured in overseas factories , mainly CHINA ect .

 

Unfortunately you do not mention the Model of your faulty Tv or the magazine you have contacted regarding this issue. I am sure you would be allowed to on this forum but I am not a moderator so I cannot say for sure.

 

One thing I do know is COMET like DSG do not like phone calls from News Papers , Magazines , Lawyers. Trading standards , ect , ect ect, and also being mentioned on forums like this regarding unhappy customers and they do tend to respond quickly if this happens.

 

How you get on with this case regarding wour faulty 3 year old Tv could be long and drawn out .

 

I do hope you have purhcased another Tv in the meantime obviously not from COMET .

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...