Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • how did Paula Vennells, an ordained priest, fall so far and so fast from grace? - because she was never in grace - and always just another devil in shepherds clothing   Post Office scandal: how did Paula Vennells, an ordained priest, fall so far and so fast from grace? | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM The former chief executive and archbishop’s confidant appears at the Horizon IT inquiry this week to explain her role in the affair that wrecked the...  
    • I started paying her old council tax as they said they would jail her I managed to get those account details. We then got back together she moved in with me stopped me going to my house. Eventually let me back in I was there 4 days then the police showed up at 1am arrested me for 8 different offences. On the morning I was in custody she rang the letting agent and asked for the house to be changed to her sole name as I was in jail. The house was changed to her name I was made homeless. The bills she did not change to her name left them as occupier the utility companies then said I had to pay as there was lots more usage than an empty property. My solicitor said if I don't pay them I will be reported for it. It has since turned out that in her old property she didn't pay the bills. The electric bill she put in her daughter's name then cancelled the direct debit the council tax she never attempted to pay. Due to one of the accusations I have since been told I need to pay these bills even after getting emails saying I'm not liable for the bills. I have forwarded these on to the police and solicitors and had no reply. Other than you have to pay these bills. I'm also going to end up paying the bills where she lives now as once again they are not being paid. I can't go in to detail about the case as I'm due to be charged next week not sure what with yet but the police have told me I'm going to be charged.  My ex will not tell me nor can tell me about her debts as she doesn't want me to know how much debt she is in or has put her daughter in once she turned 18. I do not want to be paying her debts after what she has done to me.
    • In the earlier thread (now linked above) you were going to change your name by Deed Poll. Did you do that? Did it solve any of your problems? What, exactly, have you been charged with? Has a court date been scheduled? I cannot think of any reason why the police would tell you to pay your Ex's debts that she incurred 5 years before you met her. Either there's lots of the story you aren't telling us, or you have misunderstood what you have been told, or you are trolling us. Earlier you said it was your Ex who wanted you to pay her debts and, for some reason that  no-one here could understand, you were going to do so. So your Ex can give you all the details of her debts and you can pay them. She can hardly expect you to pay them if she won't give you the account details! I've never known debt collectors be fussy about who pays as long as someone does. They routinely take payments from friends and family to clear debts. It's not illegal to pay someone else's debts          
    • What you've said isn't helping. Please post up a redacted version of the appropriate section of the court papers.  HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rented for 6 years, now applied for housing benefit - landlord wants to serve notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

We have been renting a property for nearly 6 years, always paid our rent by standing order and on time.

Unfortunately, my husband has been laid off recently and to get by until he resecures new employment we have applied for housing benefit.

we filled out the forms and sent the page to our landlord.

Now our landlord left a message on our answer machine, saying that her 'mortgage company' does not except tenants that are on housing benefit. (We have never been on benefits before).

She also claims that she has to serve us a 'section 21' notice (2 months)

 

Now obviously, we cannot afford a house move, have nowhere to move too yet and actually don't want to move. We have 3 children under the age of 10 who go to school here in the village and we hope not to stay on benefits for too long as we are actively seeking re-employment.

 

Can anyone give us some advice? Where do we legally stand with this? As far as we understand is that the landlord will not notice the difference when it comes to her monthly rent as I believe that it is fully covered.

 

We haven't phoned the landlord back yet, and want to be prepared.. so appreciate your help very much!

 

Flo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legally - the landlord can absolutely do this I'm afraid.

 

Moreover if the mortgage company doesnt allow HB, she MUST do this.

 

Sorry but there really isnt much of a way around this...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As MrShed said, but was the ban on claiming HB included in the AST / clearly explained at start of T?

or is it a condition of the mortgage that LL cannot offer property to Ts already claiming HB?

 

I would suggest you arrange to meet LL asap, appreciate her mortgage dilemma and decide whether she is just using it as an excuse.. Perhaps ask her who is her mortgage provider and then do some online research.

 

Technically she has already inadvertantly breached any no HB clause in her mortgage and will do so for a further 2 months so should advise them of the change to your status. She could enquire if an existing recently made redundant T of 6 yrs and now only recently claiming HB, is covered by the clause.

She may be able to negotiate a clause suspension for a 6 month period. if she doesn't want to lose a reliable tenant.

If mortgage/LL provider demands your legal eviction for claiming HB entitlement in this economic downturn they could receive an adverse press.

It is fair enough excluding HB claimants from taking new tenancies & evicting those who fail to maintain rent payments IMO

 

In this case, it is in everyones interest for LL to receive rent and make the mortgage repayments.

Is your partner claiming JSA? contribution or income-based?

What is his chances of new employment in that area?

 

It is possible LLs property insurance also contains a No HB clause.

The other reason that HB claimants are feared is that LHA rates and entitlement can change with govt policy as per Apr 2011.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would advise any T to keep LL apprised of any change in circumstance.

If the T can maintain AST condition of paying rent on due date, LL is likely non the wiser.

However many HB claimants expect rent to be covered by Council although any claim can take several weeks to process and may be refused.

HB is always paid 2-4 weeks in arrears and T may not use it to pay rent.

The T can quickly become 2 months behind in due rent and open to a s8 repossession Notice whilst awaiting HB

LL is entitled to direct payment of HB if T is >8wks in arrears.

If HB claim has been submitted I would suggest the T provides the LL with DPA consent form allowing LL to discuss certain aspects of claim with Council.

 

Recently I had a T required to claim HB due to redundany. HB dept refused payment on the basis the AST had expired (beyond fixed term) Only the LL could confirm applicant was still T and the AST was now a Statutory Periodic, a concept alien to HB dept.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim has been approved for my full rent on the basis of an expired (the fixed term has) AST lease. They did require an electric/water/gas bill from the last month to prove I still lived there.

 

Fortunately I am in the position to pay this and next months rent.

 

I can see how a tenant could get into arrears if they are unable to cover those 4 weeks before the first payment + the time taken to complete a claim. My claim again was straight forward and I had all details to hand.

 

My LL is a large commercial company that owns the entire block I live in, and which is considered 'exclusive'. Fortunately I share the flat with another joint tenant so my rent is halved, and again fortunately my half of rent is covered by the LHA.

 

I feel if my landlord had found out about my claim I would have been served notice to leave or I would have had to provide a guarentor. I have no intention in telling them of my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council will not contact LL if you do not want them to.

HB is paid directly to you when approved and you can do what ever you like with it, but is usualy paid to LL to cover the rent or towards it if rent is more than the hb.

In other words the LL need never know if you do not want them to. As long as the rent is paid on time you nothing to worry about.

Some LL like the HB paid direct to them from the council so at least they know they are getting a regular payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council will not contact LL if you do not want them to.

HB is paid directly to you when approved and you can do what ever you like with it, but (is usualy)
should be
paid to LL to cover the rent or towards it if rent is more than the hb.

In other words the LL need never know if you do not want them to. As long as the rent is paid on time you nothing to worry about.

Some LL (like)
reluctantly accept
the HB paid direct to them from the council so at least they know they are getting a regular payment.
albeit 4 weeks in arrears.
LL can request direct HB payments if T is more than 8 weeks in arrears or a 'vulnerable' T (incapable of managing rent payments?)

 

General observations, consider

1 LL may have mortgage or Ins on property which specifically excludes tenants claiming HB

2 If such exclusion is highlighted in the AST, the T could be in breach of contract, with the Council complicit if they have copy of AST

3 HB is payable to an individual and for a specific address/tenancy, otherwise why require copy of AST?

4 IMO HB should not be transferrable to new address until T can show they have complied with legal requirements to vacate (due Notice) and would remain payable to current LL. The corrollary being the LL cannot effect a s21 unless any deposit is protected, T given prescribed information before s21 Notice served with correct dates specified.

5 IMO DPA does not prevent a Council providing the names & registered addresses only of any HB claimants. This could be restricted online to Council registered LLs and T consent be inc in any HB application (see electoral register reqs)

Best advice is to keep any mortgage provider/LL apprised of reduced finanacial circumstance

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council will not contact LL if you do not want them to.

.

Unfortunately this is incorrect,Councils have a legal duty to protect tax payers money and can by law contact a LL,to confirm the tenant lives there,confirm how much the rent is and so on,but mainly to prevent Fraud...

 

When you claim HB

 

you have to give the LL/agents address on the HB form,if you don't they can refuse to pay HB..

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

true about putting LL name etc. on application, but you also have to give the council permission to contact them!!

Have any of you filled one of these forms out recently, I have for a friend and thats what it says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I filled one in last month.

 

They do ask for the Landlord details.

 

The council does not normally contact the LL unless you cannot provide any recent documents showing you still live at the property or a valid original signed lease. They might contact your LL if they believe you to be in arrears or that your LL is a family relation.

 

At my last meeting I asked if they contact my LL as I feared I would be evicted. They said no aslong as the above criteria is met.

 

I have checked my lease and there is no covenant relating to HB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

true about putting LL name etc. on application, but you also have to give the council permission to contact them!!

Have any of you filled one of these forms out recently, I have for a friend and thats what it says.

 

Its true they dont have to contact LL if the tenant has given correct details on HB form and shown council original document,but

 

Councils can and do contact LL/agents without tenant's permission for routine checks,mainly to prevent HB/CT fraud..

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...