Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So as I stated, I posted my letter off but over 2 weeks later I've had a visit from one of their reps. I didn't indulge him in any conversation, and I just stated that any such debts are statute-barred and closed the door on him. I was hoping they'd take notice of the letter. Where do I go from here? Thanks
    • I apologise if I was being unclear. Where it currently stands is that they will have it repair, placing scaffolding in our garden for 5 days. They have moved fast, but we will still have to postpone our contractors, meaning, we won't necessarily have the work done in time for the wedding and therefore will incur additional expenses for either a marquee or a wedding venue. They are vehemently against having any kind of liability in any regard but continue repeating that they are legally entitled to use our garden for their repairs (I believe this is true unless the work can be carried out using a cherry picker). The neighbour seems either indifferent or oblivious to the fact they can't reach all of the side of the roof from the space where they can place the scaffolding. They have asked their roofer of choice about using a cherry picker but the roofer has said it wasn't possible. It's not clear whether the roofer doesn't want to use a cherry picker or whether there is an issue with it. They have told us it is a problem that we are installing a gazebo as it will prevent them to access their roof from our garden in the future?!?  
    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think. She was an 'advocate'.. if I recall her intro to me correctly.. So verbal arguments can throw spanners in Court because Plinks dogs outsource their work and send a Junior advocate.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debts in England can they persue me in Scotland.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4836 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have been reading this with interest and also need some advice.

I live in Scotland.

I recently received a letter sent to my mothers address chasing me for debt I owe to a bank and a credit card.

These debts were ran up in England in the early Noughties - and I THINK I was defaulted or perhaps CCJ'd for both back in 2003 or 2004.

However this is me going by memory and I do not think I hold any of the original paperwork from back when I started to get into trouble.

When I checked my credit report there was no note of either the Credit Card OR bank I owe on it.

My credit report only shows an active catalogue account and another active bank account and I think it is through these 2 forms of credit that they have caught me.

This company do not know my real address as I was using my mothers address (with her full knowledge) for catalogue purchases and as my other bank acct is registered to that address and I have topped my mobile up a few times, they are now trying to pursue me for 2 debts unrelated to either the catalogue OR the bank.

My questions are as follows:

Can they pursue me for these 2 debts at this address just because they have spotted me paying another creditor and my phone via this address?

If I shut down BOTH the bank account (I have another, not connected to that address) and also the catalogue account, can they still pursue me, if I shut off all means of contact or connection to that address?

Will this action blacklist my parents?

Can they send bailiffs to my parent's address if I do not live there and thus have no assets attached there (I have none anyways)?

Can they arrest my wages?

My other bank account is not connected to my parents address.

If this debt was ran up in England, can they still pursue me through Scottish law and Scottish courts??

Finally can I get away with sending them the letters I have seen on this thread even if I am unsure of the date of when the last payment/ contact was made?

Any help would be greatly appreciated and if you need clarification on anything then give me a holler.

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I've started a new thread for you.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can pursue you in Scotland. It's what they can do about it that's different.

Sounds like the debt is prescribed if your dates are right - not only is it statute barred, it has been extinguished (5years in Scotland)

In order for sheriff officers (no bailiffs up here) to turn up at your door the creditor has to have taken action to be able to enforce the debt in Scotland. Having a ccj is not enough.

Anyway, the only contact you should make is to tell them that the debt has prescribed. They then have to prove it if it's not.

Get help with the wording from local cab as it's important not to acknowledge the debt (just in case your dates are wrong).

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means the debt is no longer there. At all. Prescription and limitations Scotland act (1973 I think).

Creditors keep trying because in England I think they can ask you for money but not take court action if a debt is statute barred. They just don't bother to check scots law.

That's if it hasn't been acknowledged or court action taken in a five year period

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi maroondevo52,

 

The bank is HBOS PLC but was Bank of Scotland back in 2001/02 when I was a student and the other debt is for Egg Credit card taken out down in England in 2002/03 (possibly earlier as I think thats when I defaulted back, rather than opened the account). Again a lot of this is going by memory.....

 

The debt collecting agency is Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, based in Leeds. I'm going to the C.A.B tonight for further advice but was wondering if they are able to advise me properly on this, as are they not legally bound to tell me to pay and help me with a payment plan?? An option I do not want to take as I do not want to be back on the radar of these companies as your treated like **** and they prey on your lack of knowledge of the law and fear to get you to pay......

 

The financial industry messed up this economy and were all too keen to dish the dough out to all us students when times were booming - now its bust and they have the cheek to try and pursue us all when they sat back and left us alone for years, whilst reaping the fat-cat payouts and bonuses.....Rant Over !

 

Yours in silent protest... C :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it matter that on the agreement it may say 'governed by English Law' or words to that effect? If so, does it count the other way round, that an agreement based on Scottish Law has a five year limit?

 

No. Debt collection has to be carried out according to scots law if you live in Scotland and English law if you live in England. Doesn't matter if the agreement says governed by English law. I know what our local sheriffs would say to that one !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I have been reading this with interest and also need some advice. I live in Scotland.

I recently received a letter sent to my mothers address chasing me for debt I owe to a bank and a credit card.

These debts were ran up in England in the early Noughties - and I THINK I was defaulted or perhaps CCJ'd for both back in 2003 or 2004.

However this is me going by memory and I do not think I hold any of the original paperwork from back when I started to get into trouble.

When I checked my credit report there was no note of either the Credit Card OR bank I owe on it.

My credit report only shows an active catalogue account and another active bank account and I think it is through these 2 forms of credit that they have caught me.

As you are unsure regarding dates ect, I would tend to send the 'Prove it' letter, I would think as these debts were taken out whilst you were staying in England that English Law would apply regarding Statute Barring

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?428-General-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

This company do not know my real address as I was using my mothers address (with her full knowledge) for catalogue purchases and as my other bank acct is registered to that address and I have topped my mobile up a few times, they are now trying to pursue me for 2 debts unrelated to either the catalogue OR the bank.

My questions are as follows:

Can they pursue me for these 2 debts at this address just because they have spotted me paying another creditor and my phone via this address?

It's the only address they have, what address did you use when taking out these accounts

If I shut down BOTH the bank account (I have another, not connected to that address) and also the catalogue account, can they still pursue me, if I shut off all means of contact or connection to that address?

Would'nt make any odds in my opinion.

Will this action blacklist my parents?

No, I would'nt think so.

Can they send bailiffs to my parent's address if I do not live there and thus have no assets attached there (I have none anyways)?

Can they arrest my wages? My other bank account is not connected to my parents address.

They would first have to obtain a Decree, Money judgments issued in Scotland are referred to as decrees and are issued through the Sheriff's Courts. They are the Scottish equivalent to England’s and Wales’ money judgments which are issued in the county courts, CCJ's

If this debt was ran up in England, can they still pursue me through Scottish law and Scottish courts??

They would have to, if they issued a court claim from a English Court and you are domiciled in Scotland (e.g. Scotland is your usual home) and entered into the contract as a consumer then the action will be incompetent, upon the grounds that the County Court does not have legal jurisdiction to hear the case.

Finally can I get away with sending them the letters I have seen on this thread even if I am unsure of the date of when the last payment/ contact was made?

You would have to send a Subject Access Request to the origional creditor

Any help would be greatly appreciated and if you need clarification on anything then give me a holler.

thanks in advance

Regards.

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi clooboo

CAB is not duty bound to get you to pay.

They should be checking prescription etc.

My only worry is the ccj.

Did you definitely have one registered to you?

For both debts?

And were you living in England at the time?

The fact that nothing is on your credit report means that it could be worth a prescriptions letter anyway.

They would have to register the decree in Scotland then serve you with a charge for payment before doing anything - assuming the ccj gives them the right to pursue longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scott,

 

Could you further explain a Subject Access Request - I think I know what it means. Is it me asking for the last correspondence from them before the debt was passed on?? If I did this would it adversely affect me in that the debt collectors would now be able to keep chasing me.

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

and to bluedogx

 

I think the ccj was served in England after I left and I only actually spotted that on my credit file way after I'd left England and am actually unaware what it is for.

 

in terms of wages arrestment, decree or ccj's (apologies if im getting the terminology wrong) - would they have to give me fair warning, with the right to reply before continuing down this path?? I'm worried in case they have the power to go ahead and arrest any wages without my knowledge and I only see it when I get a short paycheck one month.......

 

See, the fear is beginning to work on me now......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cerebrualert says that permission to pursue a ccj over 6 years old is rarely given.

So - IF they get permission they still have to register a decree in Scotland and then serve you with a charge for payment before they do anything. Ask cab to send a prescriptions letter. They have to prove it hasn't prescribed.

I doubt if anything else will happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

C.A.B advised me 2 things - 1) sending any letter acknowledges the debt but they were willing to send the prescription letter on my behalf, and in addition, when we were discussing it, I recalled more info such as one of the debts is from 2001/ 02 and the other from 2003/ 04 - surely this is time barred now and Lowells are just after a profit??

 

and

 

2) Continue to ignore, until such times they escalate proceedings, then go back and see them

 

I was not advised which way to go, I was just given the options and the possible outcomes. Im going to close both the catalogue and bank account connected to that address but keep an eye on things to see where I can go next.....all in all - they will have to give me fair warning of any escalation and I will have a time limit to respond......plus one debt was with Bank of Scotland which is now HBOS - does that not count for something? The fact my debt is with an 'old' bank (apologies for the oversimplification but you know what I mean)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. A prescription letter does not acknowledge the debt. It tells them that the debt has prescribed and invites the creditor to prove otherwise.

 

2. A debt with bank of Scotland is still a debt to HBOS.

 

Wait for a reply, if any, to letter. If they don't reply they'll have closed their file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your help. ok update:

 

I didn't send the prescription letter on the advice of the CAB as they said it was acknowledging the debt, now a week later they have escalated their letters and have passed my debt onto ANOTHER company (also based in Leeds) called Red Debt Collection Services and they're stating they are specialists in assessing accounts for litigation and they will be obtaining a copy of my credit file to review my circumstances.

 

They're threatening legal action - even though I'm in Scotland and are saying they may apply to the Sherrifs Court for a decree and if successful they will apply to secure the debt against my property - I rent privately so I know they're screwed there - or they will deduct straight from my wages or instruct a sheriff to remove good from my house. Alternatively, instead of a decree, if my account meets "certain criteria", serve a statutory demand upon me where I do not then repay petition for my sequestration and if I was made bankrupt, I could lose rights in relation to property....what does this last part mean?? What tactics are they trying to pull here? I have also just received a call from my mother stating that they have called her house, with a recorded message saying that she was to push "1" to listen to a message and it stated that they were looking for me and I was to call a tel no urgently today.

 

I am going to the CAB again tonight and I was wondering if I should just send away that prescription letter to them in the meantime? They are intimidating me and my family now and I am so fkn angry at their ****ty tactics - I will go to court and lock horns with these b@stards if I have to and these debts are over 10 fkn years old..

 

Please help me

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I didn't send the prescription letter on the advice of the CAB as they said it was acknowledging the debt"

 

A properly worded letter will not acknowledge the debt. Have a look on the templates here or Govan law centre web site to get a prescriptions letter.

 

Property - don't worry about this if youre renting but check your tenancy agreement. Never heard of anyone being evicted if rent arrears are not included in s bankruptcy though.

 

Send the prescriptions letter. They should not escalate recovery action unless they can prove the debt is still 'live'.

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...