Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JD Williams - Credit Not Asked For; Is This Debt Enforceable?


gressfjell
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thought I'd best post a new thread about this, instead of hijacking someone elses lol! Here's my story...

In 2008 I bought goods from JD Williams because I was going abroad for a few months and paid upfront. No mention of credit agreement when I ordered, and I certainly didn't ask for one. Whilst abroad my mum told me that I had letters back home to say that I had been given a credit limit with them. That I hadn't asked for! Fair enough, I said, though I didn't plan to use it as I learnt my lesson a decade earlier, in my early twenties, with store card debt. So I didn't think any more of it.

Well whilst abroad I went through a bad break up with my then boyfriend, and before I got back I also had experienced a traumatic physical injury. Feeling pretty crappy, possibly the lowest point of my life for some time, I decided to 'treat myself' to some nice new clothes using the credit that had erstwhile sat there unused for several months. After all, it can't hurt right?

Fast forward to 2010 and as quickly as I was paying off the limit I had, they were putting it up. It started at just £150 and was over 2,000 by last year. At one point I was paying them £150 a month just to try to pay it off but the interest kept accruing. Anyway I am now in 2,250 debt to them, and they are trying to get repayments.

My query is - I know what I'm like when it comes to store credit, hence why I didn't ask for credit and paid upfront for the goods. I was fine for ages but then a little vulnerability/crisis in my life and bang they had me by the short and curlies. Personally I think it should be illegal. They have effectively committed fraud by opening a credit account without my knowledge. There was honestly no mention at the time I paid for the goods, I wouldn't have done it otherwise. Yes I shouldn't have ordered anything from them but it's human nature to do that and these sick companies prey on human nature. If I had asked for credit then I would take responsibility but I didn't even ask for it in the first place, and feel positively shafted.

What can I do, if anything??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I'd best post a new thread about this, instead of hijacking someone elses lol! Here's my story...

In 2008 I bought goods from JD Williams because I was going abroad for a few months and
paid upfront with my debit card.
No mention of credit agreement when I ordered, and I certainly didn't ask or apply for one. Whilst abroad my mum told me that I had letters back home to say that I had been given a credit limit with them. That I hadn't asked for! Fair enough, I said, though I didn't plan to use it as I learnt my lesson a decade earlier, in my early twenties, with store card debt. So I didn't think any more of it.

Well whilst abroad I went through a bad break up with my then boyfriend, and before I got back I also had experienced a traumatic physical injury. Feeling pretty crappy, possibly the lowest point of my life for some time, I decided to 'treat myself' to some nice new clothes using the credit that had erstwhile sat there unused for several months. After all, it can't hurt right.......?!

Fast forward to 2010 and as quickly as I was paying off the limit I had, they were putting it up. It started at just £150 and was over 2,000 by last year. At one point I was paying them £150 a month just to try to pay it off but the interest kept accruing. I've probably long paid off the goods amount that I owe. Anyway I am now in 2,250 debt to them, and they are trying to get repayments.

I know what I'm like when it comes to store credit - I spend it - hence why I didn't ask for credit and paid upfront for the goods. I was fine for ages but then had a little vulnerability/crisis in my life and bang they had me by the short and curlies. Personally I think it should be illegal. They have effectively committed fraud by opening a credit account without my knowledge. There was honestly no mention at the time I paid for the goods, I wouldn't have done it otherwise. I just thought I was ordering from a mail order catalogue and since I was paying upfront, a credit account wouldn't be part of the scenario at all. No other mail order catalogue has ever done this.

Yes I shouldn't have ordered anything from them later on, on credit, but it's human nature to do that really, and these sick companies prey on human nature. If I had asked for credit then I would take responsibility but I didn't even ask for it in the first place, and feel positively shafted.

What can I do, if anything?? Can they really pursue me for a debt that I never applied for in the first place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmn,the difficulty in any challenge now is that you were using their facility and paying them back.

Have you tried to get hold of any data which could determine if you actually did agree to a credit limit ?

Whats the current position-has it been passed for recovery,are there any DCAs on the scene ?

When did you last make payment?

Looks like you should be thinking of a SAR.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a thread here which may be of interest

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?275736-JD-williams-home-shopping-debt-out-of-control-CCA-please-help&highlight=JD+Williams

 

I also saw that you have posted your issues elsewhere-will merge here try to keep your posts in one place as its easier for those helping you to follow.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Martin - no worries re merge, I hadn't had reply and wondered if I had posted in wrong place so tried Debt forum as well lol!

It's still with Reliable at moment and my last payment was made last year, around August I think. I've not tried to get hold of any data regarding agreeing - would I CCA them for this? It's mad because I just thought I was ordering as normal online, paying by card as you do. I didn't apply for credit at all so they must have sneaked it in somewhere during the order process about opening an account. To anyone paying by card upfront with no intention of applying for credit, that would slip by very easily.

To me this situation is a bit like a recovered alcoholic who has been clean for 10 years going into a pub, buying an orange juice because he knows how he is with alcohol - it's a dangerous path to take. Then a couple of days later, he gets a voucher in the post from the pub, not something he asked for or applied for, for unlimited free alcoholic drinks for life, because he bought the orange juice. Now that former alcoholic may not touch the voucher for weeks, months, years, but as soon as he hits a tough spot in his life he is likely to make use of that voucher. To my mind that alcoholic has already taken responsibility for his tendency to be tempted by initially ordering an orange juice (like I did when I paid upfront) and so the actions of the pub (and my catalogue) are unsolicited and ought to be viewed as sinister and exploitative. How can a person ever overcome their issues with compulsive debting/using credit when there are companies around that seem to be legally allowed to hand out credit even when a person hasn't applied for it. There was a very good reason why I didn't apply for it and I'm sure I'm not alone in my experience. Maybe I should have been stronger, but it just seems wrong, somehow.

Sorry for long post lol. it's an issue that's been on my mind for a while and I wonder if the courts should take a look at catalogues who do this. My mother and grandmother used catalogues for years and I'd never heard of a company that automatically gave you a credit account without you asking for it, hence why i figured paying upfront would be the end of it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

orange ... alcohol.......

 

you had the credit you spent it, knowingly.........

 

bit silly to cry wolf now.

 

might be best to enter a DMP .

 

see sequenci's blog

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A request under CCA would likely give only very limited info,you would be best placed doing a full SAR asking for some detailed info.

Its very likely that there will have been lots of charges added to the account which I am sure you could challenge to reduce the amount owed.

Yes I see what you are saying about vulnerability with these companies,much the same as Provident and others.

Whichever way you want to go from here,there is help to do that.

I can see that you want to get it sorted.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interestingly I found some figures for complaints which the JDW group has had

 

http://images2.drct2u.com/content/common/pdf/FSAComplaintsReporting.pdf

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...