Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4701 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

......and now a solicitors letter has arrived asking to pay MBNA £15,000 and I don't know what to do as I'm not in a position to repay this. I could offer minimal repayments but as of yet I havent communicated with them at all.

 

A little back story, my IVA failed as I was made redundant in 2008 and was unable to maintain payments. I've been back in work for almost 9 months and everything is going well. During the time I was unemployed I accrued a large amount of mortgage arrears (balance is approximately £3,800 at the moment) which I am slowly but steadily paying off, this will take approximately another 18 months to clear completely.

 

I work in a profession where bankruptcy would result in not being able to practice so I'm keen to avoid this, however, I'm scared witless that a judge could see that I'm insolvent should the solicitors go for the jugular.

 

The amount owed to all creditors when the IVA failed is in the region of £50k so I may not have many options but keeping my profession and a roof over my head would be preferable.

 

If anyone has any advice on:-

 

1) The best course of action regarding the solicitors letter on behalf of MBNA.

2) My overall situation.

 

I'd be extremely grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello again.

 

You have three options:

 

a) complete a personal budget and start to make informal offers to your creditors (usually via pro-rata payments, take a read of my blog)

b) a debt management plan (via one of the free providers, if possible)

c) another IVA

 

at the same time you could also consider seeing if you can reclaim penalty charges, PPI etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was considering another IVA, my worry is that the creditors wouldn't go for it as I failed the last one.

 

I know its another 5 years of my life but at least its 'managed' and I can keep all debts everything in one place.

 

Has anyone experience of a second IVA after the first one failed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen a few go through OK. You're correct that the creditors may be more reluctant to agree this time around but it's not impossible.

 

As far as the solicitor's firm is concerned, they actually have no further powers to do anything than the original creditor had.

 

Is there much equity in the property?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your nominee for the IVA values the property on a forced-sale basis, with what you mention re possible negative equity, an IVA would give a better result to creditors rather than bankruptcy, and a well constructed information pack to be sent to the creditors for the MOC to consider the proposal would illustrate this clearly and 'sell' the idea to the creditors.

 

If there is negative or very little equity in the property, by the time this was sold and the trustee in bankruptcy / OR fees were paid out from any estate, the amount to be paid in a dividend would probably be far lower than that of an IVA. In the reasoning behind the IVA, it should clearly be noted that the first IVA failed due to redundancy and not just not paying

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

You have three options:

 

a) complete a personal budget and start to make informal offers to your creditors (usually via pro-rata payments, take a read of my blog)

b) a debt management plan (via one of the free providers, if possible)

c) another IVA

 

at the same time you could also consider seeing if you can reclaim penalty charges, PPI etc?

 

Hi sequenci, Wouldnt it be a option to check on if solicitors have a agreement for this debt (CCA) as another option?

 

Wouldn't it also be worth Jopea checking when last payments where made to this debt either directly or from the Insolvency Practioner as Jopea may not have made enough payments that left anything over to pay creditors once IP took there payment?

 

Not challenging anything you said mate just running a few ideas that may help :wink:

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not challenging anything you said mate just running a few ideas that may help :wink:

 

No worries! The CCA route is another option, I guess it's down to the OP and whether they would like a potentially long and drawn out battle via the courts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries! The CCA route is another option, I guess it's down to the OP and whether they would like a potentially long and drawn out battle via the courts.

 

Was more thinking about the CCA route as being a delay to them while OP checks when they received last payment on this debt as could be a case that it not got long left if for example no payment been received by them in say 5 years.

 

Many thanks matey

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was more thinking about the CCA route as being a delay to them while OP checks when they received last payment on this debt as could be a case that it not got long left if for example no payment been received by them in say 5 years.

 

Many thanks matey

 

v.good point :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the recent replies.

 

I think I will go down the CCA route as well whilst I collect my thoughts on everything. I'd love it to all go away instead of another 5 years at £360 a month but I can't risk losing the house.

 

I've some serious thinking to do, its definitely playing on my mind a lot at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see two problems here,

 

1. the last pament would have been 2008 since the OP was paying an IVA

 

2. The OP has accepted in a court document when entering the IVA that the debts were valid, in those circumstance im not certain that they would even need the original agreements

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see two problems here,

 

1. the last pament would have been 2008 since the OP was paying an IVA

 

2. The OP has accepted in a court document when entering the IVA that the debts were valid, in those circumstance im not certain that they would even need the original agreements

 

Know what you saying mate but my sister was in exactly the same boat as OP, I advised her that since she had been in a IVA in theory the debts would have been accepted, her thoughts where what did she have to lose.

 

It proved me wrong as the 4 of the 9 creditors who did make contact, never ever said anything about the IVA etc etc and either ignored the CCA request and one said they hadn't got agreement and mentioned nothing further.

 

As the OP is trying to avoid the Bankrupt route because of his job, therefore I posted as believe that it is a option for him / her to pursue, and as they say, nothing ventured nothing gained. He or she may hit a wall, but surely its worth burning this bridge.

 

As you stated, the OP was paying into a IVA, but so was my sister, but as the Insolvency Practioner running the IVA's fee came first and payments she had made into the IVA arrangement merely covered that, the creditors got ziltch. Therefore, a check on last payment definatly worth looking into.

 

Obvously, this wouldn't apply to all, if someone had been in a IVA for 3 years and made 3 years of payments, then there definately a high chance that the creditors did get a payment. A quick check on the credit files would confirm this.

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original credit agreements werre signed between 2001 & 2004. The IVA was set up in 2005 and there were no payments after Jan 2008.

 

I was wondering about the need for the originals with the IVA, it sorta supercedes it.

 

Just noticed your reply about IVA payments and well pointed by Debtinfo.

 

I still think I would try this avenue, honestly, it could come to a dead end, however, it may not.

 

Did you actually go to court on IVA date or did IP deal with this?

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never went to court, was all dealt with by my IVA provider.

 

Thanks for the update. Can you get a copy of credit reports to see when last payment was made?

Advice & opinions given by Stinkyfeet are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask why the Supervisor of your failed IVA after two years did not petition for your Bankruptcy. Is this the standard condition in an IVA........

 

You can ask but I don't have any answers. I just received a letter stating that the IVA failed and a statement of payments and deductions.

 

Anyway, I received another letter from the Solicitors today with more threats so I think I'll send a CCA request tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...