Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cabot/morgan solicitors charging order


jag-world
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, need a litlle help!

received a charging order on 14th jan via morgans solicitor acting for cabot for the grand olde sum of £8500 for a disputed citi c/c which i opened in 2002, no letters prior to this informing me of any court action, wrote to morgans for a true signed copy of my cca 1974, morgans have responded back -

 

your letter purpouts to be a formal request pursuant to s.78(1) consumer credit act 1974 requesting a signed copy of the agreement made between the assignor and yourself and a copy of the exucuted deed of assignment.

 

The statutory authority to which you refer imposes a duty upon a creditor to provide to the debtor a copy of a regulated agreement entered into between the debtor and the creditor. However once proceedings have been issued, and a judgment obtained by the creditor, the agreement is at a end. The creditor becomes the judgment creditor and as a consquence any request made under s78 (1) is rendered nugatory as the requirements under s.78 (1) cannot be fulfilled as the agreement is no longer"...under a credit regulated agreement"

 

We would also mention that non compliance with s.78 (1) of the consumercredit act 1974 no longer constitutes a criminal offence as such liability was repealed by the consumer act 2006.

 

??????? credit card taken out in 2002 so cca 1974 not amended 2006 cca and agreement was with citi not cabot monkeys! Any help would be greatly appreciated,

Edited by jag-world
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I'm going to move this thread to the Legal Issues forum.

 

As you didn't receive court papers, you may be able to set this judgement aside. Others will pop by and advise

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to get a charging order, they must have gained a CCJ.

 

The CCJ becomes your agreement, once that is breached they can go fo a charging order.

 

Did you receive the court papers for the CCJ ?

If so, did you admit or defend the claim ?

 

They are correct, they do not have to comply with a CCA request once they have judgement, unless they are applying Post Judgement Interest.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debs, no court papers recieved, ccj was given in Nov without my knowledge, have been on electoral register at same address for almost 10 years so i know it couldnt be posted anywhere else, dont these have to be sent by registered post?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know im probably clutching to straws, but are there any new coalition rules coming into effect on the 1st Feb 2011 regarding charging orders can only be made for amounts over 25k? Its sickening would have contested claim if i had court date, Cabot also requesting interest on alleged amount. Surely they still have to show how and where this alleged amount has come from to the court and send a few letters out before court procedings or am i missing something or can they get judgments via back door these days. Have 220k equaty and 8.5k of alleged debt with 2 young children at home, any ideas on way foward with N244 form or reply to cabot?

Edited by jag-world
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I was very interested in reading your situation and want you to know all is not lost.

 

Let me tell you my story:

 

I received threats by phone and letters by Cabot regarding 3 debts that I had owed or not owed from Cabot. They stated if I did not make some payment arrangement they would take me to court and get a charging order on my property. This scared me as I have a young family to support and their future depends on me. I agreed to a payment plan that went wrong after a couple of payements as I lost my job. I explained this to them and still they sent court papers . As a scared person I admitted the debts and offered the payments I could afford.

 

The court gave judgement against me, and payments were were acceptable. However they went a step further and told the court as the debt was £13000.00 they needed additional security and abtained a charging order against my property.

 

This was done by default, and on receiving these notices it upset me so much.

 

This is where this site was my saviour. I requested the CCA. for documents pertaining to the so called loans. They kept on writing letters that they received my request and are awaiting the info from the lenders.

 

They sent letters as they did to you, but this is intimidation not law.

 

I got annoyed and I applied at the county court for a set aside for failure to provide this information as required by the consumer credit act. The judge set aside the judgement and the took the charge away from the property. The only condition being, if they provide this information they can proceed with the case. I waited a year still nothing, then I received a wad of document half of which I did not understand but in there was the documents i requested.

 

The Directions of the court were then to proceed with trial on 3 occassions as evidence needed to be gathered. 3 times at a hearing...Boring. The final direction was for me to submit a defence and for Cabot a Case and a case file.

 

They did this and my defence, if you require more info let me know, was 4 pages. They had 2 ringbinders full.

 

The trial was to last 3 hours, and a witness from Morgans was to be present.

 

Before the trial which was on 27.01.11 I was sent a bill for solicitors expences from morgans in the excess of £4000.00. which I threw in the bin.

 

The dat came I was scared, their coucel came to me before the trial and said do you want to negociate an agreement. I said no, I would like to rely on the defence I have submitted. He had his witness from Morgan's there.

 

When we were called I was really scared I did not have a solicitor, and told the judge that I could not afford one. I think that softened him a bit. However I was put on the stand and told to give evidence and the guy from Morgan's had to do the same. He was clueless and could not confirm nor deny the legalities of certain aspects of the CCA rules and kept refering it to his councel.

 

The case that was meant to be allocated 3 hours lasted all day, and do you know the shock of it I won the case on a technicality on CCA rules that they fail to adhere to, or forget to do. This was in my defence and this insight was gained from this site.

 

I love this site it inspirational. I will assist you if you need a copy of my defence.

Edited by kirsun10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kirsun, thanks so much for your reply, was starting to loose all hope, i took from an earlier post that once judgment has been given they dont have to comply for a requested cca because the ccj is the agreement now, so using this as a defence, i would be wasting my time, please tell me im wrong! BUT in a previous letter Morgans have stated they will be supplying a copy of the agreement taken out in 2002 with citi in what form i can only guess, which i have still not seen. Would be very grateful of any advice on how to proceed with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi ring the courts, and find out to which address the court docs were sent. Find out why you never recieved them.

 

Once you have established the facts, submit an N244 (you can print this from the court website), make an application to have the CCJ set a side.

 

 

Is this an Interim Charging order, with a date set for your local court. Or have they actually been granted the Charging Order.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kirsun, thanks so much for your reply, was starting to loose all hope, i took from an earlier post that once judgment has been given they dont have to comply for a requested cca because the ccj is the agreement now, so using this as a defence, i would be wasting my time, please tell me im wrong! BUT in a previous letter Morgans have stated they will be supplying a copy of the agreement taken out in 2002 with citi in what form i can only guess, which i have still not seen. Would be very grateful of any advice on how to proceed with this.

 

More than likely the actual defen ce you could use on you N244 to set aside is the fact that you have not received any offical court documentation and that you have not had any proof of the actual agreement. The fact is, you must act fast.Do this now. Another defence in my view is that this may be statute barred and they should not have got a judgement in the first place. However that depends on when you made your last payments.

 

I actually held on to the judgeent and the final charging order for a year before I actually fought it. I won because the threats they make are usually just that. They cannot get the documentation on time, and when they actually do the document they do give are not actually admissable.

 

Have letters for the court to prove you have made a CCA requests, and be adamant as to this must be received.

 

If you need I will scan a copy of my N244 if that helps, and the all document pertaining to the whole 2.5 year saga.

 

Remember I got all court documents but still won.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kirsun, thanks so much for your reply, was starting to loose all hope, i took from an earlier post that once judgment has been given they dont have to comply for a requested cca because the ccj is the agreement now, so using this as a defence, i would be wasting my time, please tell me im wrong! BUT in a previous letter Morgans have stated they will be supplying a copy of the agreement taken out in 2002 with citi in what form i can only guess, which i have still not seen. Would be very grateful of any advice on how to proceed with this.

 

More than likely the actual defence you could use on your N244 to set aside is the fact that you have not received any offical court documentation and that you have not had any proof of the actual agreement. The fact is, you must act fast. Do this now. Another defence in my view is that this may be statute barred and they should not have got a judgement in the first place. However that depends on when you made your last payments.

 

I actually held on to the judgeent and the final charging order for a year before I actually fought it. I won because the threats they make are usually just that. They cannot get the documentation on time, and when they actually do the document they do give are not actually admissable.

 

Have letters for the court to prove you have made a CCA requests, and be adamant as to this must be received.

 

If you need I will scan a copy of my N244 if that helps, and the all document pertaining to the whole 2.5 year saga.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thought i needed to reply to this thread, i am also at court tommorow with Morgans solicitors, who again are requesting a charging order, here is a bit of back ground information, original debt 7250.00. in May last year. Maintained payements, in June Morgans took me back to court for redetermination / charging order, I attended no representative from Morgans, the Judge went in my faavoiour and informed me that as long as I made the agreed payments, a C/O would not be granted.

Well thhis is where it gets interesteng, as well as making agreed payments i have als made two lump sums of £700.00 and £2300.00, this was a PPI payment to my husband as he is unable to work, silly me i paid it off this debt.

In November I contacted Morgans solicitors requesting a reduction of paymennt to £28.00 a month, and would they take into consideration the lump sums made.

I had no contact from Morgans untill the 4th of Jan, which a leter agreeing the £28.00, but would request a charging order to secure the debt, the court pappers followed a few days later, no it gets intersting, the papers state that only a payment of £76.00 had been made and not the correct amount of £3200.00

I have evidence of these payments. I contacted Morgans solicitores and highlighted the discrepancies and was told "oh yes we can see these payments were incorrect, and the updated paperwork would be sent before the court date.

I have not received any such paperwork, I have ensured a witness statmnt was sent to the court well in time, which they have received, explaining all these dicrepancies.

What would my be my next steps at court tommorow as I am defending myself, really nervous again.

Thank you

Sunnydee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sunnydee,

 

Take along all the paperwork. Statements showing that aswell as complying with the Judgement order, you have also made substantial payments to the claimant to reduce the debt.

 

I had no contact from Morgans untill the 4th of Jan, which a leter agreeing the £28.00, but would request a charging order to secure the debt, the court pappers followed a few days later, no it gets intersting, the papers state that only a payment of £76.00 had been made and not the correct amount of £3200.00

 

If the claim is inaccurate, show it. Did you agree to the charging order when you reduced the payments to £28.

 

Might be worth starting your own thread.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debbs / Kirsun, (Hi Sunnydee its another sleepless night! just lost my job over these sleepless nights so i know how it feels) Interim charging order in Norwich court around 19 days time and 100 miles from where i live, stopped all payments for the whole disputed amount in 2008 ( no crime number could be from given by poilce because lack of details supplied by Citi, only name of company and area on account statement no other details were sent in writing) But why are Morgans / Cabot writing back confirming that they will go to the bother of supplying a copy of a cca i took out in 2002 in what form i can only still guess, when they have put in writing they have no legal obligation to do so, or is it all hot air and are the still legaly obliged to do so under the 1974 agreement, i know the amended 2006 will not stand ( scheldue 3 - s11 cca 2006, prevents s15 repealing s127 (3) of the 1974 act for agreements made before s15 came into affect) Since the agreement would have commenced prior to the inception of the cca 2006, section 15 of the 2006 act has no affect and the cca 1974 is the relavant in this case. Spoke to Morgans today, letter of court date was sent BUT they told me it was sent back NOT KNOWN AT THIS ADDRESS!

Edited by jag-world
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debbs / Kirsun, (Hi Sunnydee its another sleepless night!) Interim charging order in Norwich court around 19 days time and 100 miles from where i live, stopped all payments for the whole disputed amount in 2008 ( no crime number given from poilce because lack of details supplied by Citi, only name of company and area on account statement) But why are Morgans / Cabot writing back confirming that they will supply a copy of a cca i took out in 2002, when they have put in writing they have no legal obligation to do so, or is it all hot air and are the still legaly obliged to do so, i know the amended 2006 will not stand ( scheldue 3 - s11 cca 2006, prevents s15 repealing s127 (3) of the 1974 act for agreements made before s15 came into affect)

 

CCA 2006 is not retrospective for accounts that fall under CCA 1974, so sec 127 (3) still stands. If this is not part of your Defence, then it needs to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debs /Kirsun, thanks for the fast response

I have all the paper work ready for tommorow court papers from Morgans and statements showing the correct amount paid and not the made up figure which Morgans seem to have picked out of thin air. I didn't agree to the charging order, I was told it was gong to happen. I have never seen any agreements, I wish i had requested it when i was told i owed this amoint., but at that moment in time I was ignorant of legalities and just wanted to get it sorted as fast as possible.

I will update tommorow, when over and sorted, Hopefuly.

Sunnydee :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone is to win a case with Cabot and Morgans it is to stand firm and insist they provide information. These are the rules.

 

These people are total rats who scavenge upon the weak and timid. They do not expect a fight, they are happy to obtain judgements on default. However most of the methods they use are to intimidate the consumer who knows nothing about the law and rules they must abide by.

 

That is their only strength. They do deceive you in believing you have no options, but are they wrong. I await the judgement papers of the dismissal of their case and my victory and will forward all these to the Office of Fair Trading.

 

I will post my N244 and the defence I used in my next post. Being human and having a heart does help especially in front of a judge who has to listen to Lawyer speak all day.

Edited by kirsun10
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debbs and Kirsun, Here is an update on todays charging order,

A representative from Morgans turned up, explained why we were at court, yes i know was my answer, I explained that i was oposing the charging order on the grounds of wrong information on the court paper.

He had no idea of what was going on, my witness statment never arrived at morgan or so he said. When in the diistrict judeges room i informed him of the discrepancies on the court papers, but the copy I suppmited to the court could not br found, although i contacted the courts office on monday to ensure all documents where filed, and told yes they are,. Anyway the dudge adjurned the order untill a second copy of my witness statment and evidence reached morgans and the court, then a half an hour hearing will be set and a decision made. Can you belive that morgans solicitor requested that i paid the court charges, to which the judges reply was basically no, we will wait untill the final hearing, I cant belive iv got to go through it all again.

Best wishes

Sunnydee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today have filed for defence using the N244 form, realy need to know if the debt is still legally bound by The Credit Consumer Act 1974, or is it the case when Cabot obtained a ccj without my knowledge i do loose my rights to the agreement and no statement of accounts are required and interest can be added to the alleged amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Hi

 

I was very interested in reading your situation and want you to know all is not lost.

 

Let me tell you my story:

 

I received threats by phone and letters by Cabot regarding 3 debts that I had owed or not owed from Cabot. They stated if I did not make some payment arrangement they would take me to court and get a charging order on my property. This scared me as I have a young family to support and their future depends on me. I agreed to a payment plan that went wrong after a couple of payements as I lost my job. I explained this to them and still they sent court papers . As a scared person I admitted the debts and offered the payments I could afford.

 

The court gave judgement against me, and payments were were acceptable. However they went a step further and told the court as the debt was £13000.00 they needed additional security and abtained a charging order against my property.

 

This was done by default, and on receiving these notices it upset me so much.

 

This is where this site was my saviour. I requested the CCA. for documents pertaining to the so called loans. They kept on writing letters that they received my request and are awaiting the info from the lenders.

 

They sent letters as they did to you, but this is intimidation not law.

 

I got annoyed and I applied at the county court for a set aside for failure to provide this information as required by the consumer credit act. The judge set aside the judgement and the took the charge away from the property. The only condition being, if they provide this information they can proceed with the case. I waited a year still nothing, then I received a wad of document half of which I did not understand but in there was the documents i requested.

 

The Directions of the court were then to proceed with trial on 3 occassions as evidence needed to be gathered. 3 times at a hearing...Boring. The final direction was for me to submit a defence and for Cabot a Case and a case file.

 

They did this and my defence, if you require more info let me know, was 4 pages. They had 2 ringbinders full.

 

The trial was to last 3 hours, and a witness from Morgans was to be present.

 

Before the trial which was on 27.01.11 I was sent a bill for solicitors expences from morgans in the excess of £4000.00. which I threw in the bin.

 

The dat came I was scared, their coucel came to me before the trial and said do you want to negociate an agreement. I said no, I would like to rely on the defence I have submitted. He had his witness from Morgan's there.

 

When we were called I was really scared I did not have a solicitor, and told the judge that I could not afford one. I think that softened him a bit. However I was put on the stand and told to give evidence and the guy from Morgan's had to do the same. He was clueless and could not confirm nor deny the legalities of certain aspects of the CCA rules and kept refering it to his councel.

 

The case that was meant to be allocated 3 hours lasted all day, and do you know the shock of it I won the case on a technicality on CCA rules that they fail to adhere to, or forget to do. This was in my defence and this insight was gained from this site.

 

I love this site it inspirational. I will assist you if you need a copy of my defence.

 

 

hello there

 

have just read your post and am very interested as i have a similar case

 

please can you send me a copy of your defence as you offered and i would be so grateful as i have to submist one by thursday

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...