Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We purchased our Mercedes in September 2023 from Doves in Horsham for £21000, paying half cash and half on finance. We also purchased warranty for life via Ramp as recommended by Doves. On 12th May 2024 the car failed to recognise the key and wouldn’t not open, the AA could not identify the problem so via our warranty the car was taken to Mercedes in Croydon. After 3 weeks the problem was finally identified as water ingress in the drivers side footwell which has corroded and blown various components. After further investigation it was discovered the windscreen was date stamped 2019 (all the windows are 2018 - therefore not the factory fitted windscreen) The leak has developed due to incorrect sealant being used assuming when this was replaced and also water leaking from the seam. The warranty company do not cover water ingress so we are now faced with a bill of £3635. As we are now at 8 months since purchase (problem started at just over 7 months) we are not covered by the consumer rights acts. Would we be covered Sale of Goods Act? We have all the reports for the works being completed but unsure if this should be taken to the finance company or Doves who we purchased the car from. Do we pay for the works and then try and claim it back or should they be paying? Any help would be much appreciated
    • im also wondering if back billing applies here too . from looking at like threads around this SSE to ovo compulsory switch, it must be evidenced by the claimant that bills were regularly issued for the period of the supply the debt they claim covers. there are no threads here that show they could ever produce them, so back billing rules (12mts) might also play a part.
    • Vodafone have reported that they are having issues with their Credit File APIs into the Credit Reference Agencies where aged accounts over 6 years are being readded to Credit Files. In some instances, people are having defaults rescinded and changed to late payment status making the account live again!    --- Have you been affected? Please keep an eye out on your credit file for any  new Vodafone Account appearing where there shouldnt be any reason. If you are a Vodafone Customer - Check that the information is correct. check for Late Payments and Defaults.    Don't forget to consider the financial impacts this could have on you.  ---   If you are struggling - Post below and we can guide you to get the result you need!    Its been reported that Experian and TransUnion seem to be where these appear.  They are able to remove the information relatively quickly and it will reflect on next Credit File Refresh.         
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Need Advice on if lowell can do this


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes, if the debt has been sold to Lowell's then they have the right to check your credit file. When you signed an agreement with Vanquis you gave them the right to do this for the duration of the agreement.

This also applies if they sell your account to Lowells as you are still bound by the terms and conditions of that agreement

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will probably see any default on your credit file change to lowells as well. They should be taking over the existing default from Vanquis and have the rights to update and manage it

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is, but you gave Vanquis permission to search it and record entries on it for the duration of your credit agreement. Those rights transfer to whoever purchases the account from them.

Note that the DCA is also bound to the terms of the previous agreement , so they can't apply their own T&C's , ie their own interest rate

Edited by FORMISTER
clarification

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether they have bought the alleged debt or not, if they have an interest in the account ie, they have been informed to collect on behalf of an original creditor (OC) then you will see them flag up searching your file, if they are the chosen DCA then their name will appear against the entries and default.

 

Agreed that this shouldn't happen, but it does and no-one seems to care except those who's CRF's are searched without their permission.

 

However as you are aware of this, then your original agreement will have contained that in the event of defaults or no payment, that you give your permission to them to pass your details to a third party, 'the DCA', once these vultures have the go ahead then they are a law unto themselves, and as DCA's and CRA's (credit reference agencies) are the best of buddies and they (CRA's) are paid by the DCA's to place this erroneous info on peoples CRF's then their is little that can be done.

 

If your seriously choked about it, then lodge a complaint with the CRA.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CRA's always side with the DCA's. The CRA's investigations from your complaints/enquiries basically involve asking the DCA if they are correct, the DCA replying "yes", and then the CRA telling you their investigation is complete and they are doing nothing about it.

 

Apparently according to the CRA's they don't need to see evidence and they are fullfilling their obligations by just asking and if you don't like it, complain to the ICO

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, which is why those with valid complaints, after a tin pot DCA has been searching your CRF for no reason and without your express permission MUST be reported, first to the CRA's then the ICO.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to but in buta quick question,

if the OC has sent a letter closing the account, or passed it to in house morons who write asking for the full outstanding ballance, is the agreement not teminated,

so can the DCA add intrest as in the original agreement

ms witts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes once the full balance of an account is requested you can then take it that the account is terminated, therefore no further interest or charges should be added.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...