Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

a bit long winded *sorry* benefit fraud sentencing


worriedtodeath
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It would be very fair to say that prison, for both the inmate and the visitor is a "unique" experience and not one either of us would really care to repeat.

 

Don't get me wrong - once everything was analysed, mistakes had been made and there was invariably (as there always is for us mere mortals) consequences for those mistakes, no matter how innocently made. Whether the consequences were fair, proportionate or not is a matter for debate.

 

We've just moved on from all this now, and I'm only just about feeling "up" to talking about it. As a couple, we've moved on, too. This is the kind of experience that will either kill a relationship or make it immeasurably stronger, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out which happened to us.

 

I can understand your attitude towards the LA totally. Just be aware though that they will not have closed your claim down - even though you have expressed a wish to no longer have the benefit, your claim will still be open, just not in payment. I found this to my horror when we had a lot of grief last year and I ended up having to make, then stop, then re-make an HB claim. However, that's not for this thread!

 

Thanks for the support. You, myself and my wife are as near-dammit the same age, BTW....

 

Count your blessings having a family to support you, and please don't envy us. My parents passed away a long time ago, and her mother essentially disowned her when all this happened, which left this little family unit out on their own. To say things have been "challenging" since would be an understatement.

 

Don't let them faze you or try and trip you up on 14th. Stick to your guns, stick to the facts and you'll be OK. I wish you luck.

 

For what it's worth, I think that you're cutting your nose off to spite your face if you don't claim the HB. The only people you're hurting by this is the very people that shouldn't be - you and the kids. You work, you pay tax and stamp, and you're entitled to some help with your housing costs. £120 a week may sound plenty to live on, but it doesn't go far these days and leaves nothing for any form of contingency - what happens if you suddenly need to find a pair of shoes or two, or a new school uniform? Claim what is rightfully yours, but make sure you keep copies of the claim form and any documentation you send in to them. If you have to communicate with them, do it in writing only - do not under any circumstances engage in a conversation on the phone with them unless you are recording the conversation. By not claiming this money, you aren't reducing this alleged overpayment.

 

I'm sure your Dad will prove a tower of strength on the day - some of these guys can be very intimating and try to twist your words or trip you up and someone else being present who isn't afraid to speak their mind if they detect unfairness might make all the difference.

 

I didn't stop the claim to stop any overpayments for this, I dont owe them any now, apart from 200 to council tax which they agreed to add on to my direct debits in the new finantial year. I hear what you're saying about cutting my nose off to spite my face, I have had numerous people say that. But even if you record, ask for names & kiss their behind, it seems you'll still have to go through this rigmarol of being guilty until you have proven innocent.

And for example, if you think about the police for instance, calling you in every year or so because they think you robbed someones house, when you know you can prove you didn't. But producing your proof & waiting months for them to believe that? Would you want to go through that besides your innocence?

I take my hat off to you if your experience hasn't put you off claiming any benefits. I admire you for that, very brave, I cant see it like that right now.

BUT I am not saying I wont change my mind in the future, once the dust has settled, I may have to, as you say 120 quid a week isn't a lot. But I will make sure if that times comes that I will be down there every month with my payslip/ statements/ all of it. Then checking with someone else that they have done it right. Oh & also plenty of Diazapam lol I dont cope with anxiety, I have about 20 pills in the cupboard, one will be used next thursday for sure, can you tell..

I think a good few million people know how bad it's getting now & will live in poverty rather than claim anything, that's why supposedly 16 billion goes unclaimed but at the end of the day now, that is the aim isn't it....

Here's an interesting paragraph..

Tax evasion, as Polly Toynbee pointed out (Comment, 4 September), costs the public purse over £15bn a year, as opposed to just over £1bn in benefit fraud. Senior tax inspectors on £50,000 bring in about £1.5m each and lower-level inspectors on £25,000 bring in £300,000: 10 times more than is recouped by Department for Work and Pensions fraud-chasers.

....um yeh....

Department of Work and Pensions estimates benefit fraud costs £1bn a year (p11).

 

http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/how-much-does-benefit-fraud-cost/3423

Edited by jadeybags
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

It was really interesting to work through this thread. I've also experienced being accused of benefit fraud and I'll run through the experience to date, it's still ongoing. I separated from my partner in late 2007, in late 2008 work had completely dried up and I went through the DWP interview on the phone that takes an eternity. The sole intention was to register the previous main residence where my ex and 2 x dependants still lived in order that they were in receipt of the housing benefit, not me. I did what I'd always done and that was deal with these financial matters and issues and still do to a certain extent. I was paying poll tax and residing within another local authority until 2010 when I moved out and rented the place out to look after my mother who had a stroke.

 

I could not get my name off the previous main residence as there were arrears (now cleared) and the lender would not entertain it due to the ex wife's income. I only had technical ownership. The idea of jointly and severally liable gets called into question. Take for an example a serial philanderer who buys a property with a series of lovers from county to county, technically he's liable for all these properties, bit extreme but I think you get the correlation.

 

I never claimed any benefits whatsoever such as job seekers etc etc. This was totally alien to me and I thought if I signed on I would fall into a spiral, so I worked through it and managed, by my fingernails, to hang on to everything and I am still dealing with creditors although there is now light at the end of the tunnel. The real issue here is that those that make these decisions and pursue are typically pen pushers with a chip on their shoulder.

 

There has to be some regulatory body or review body that has to see that the process currently is fundamentally unfair and unjust. Those typically being pursued have been disadvantaged and suffered especially through the recession. It reminds me of no more than a kangaroo court. I don't think it will ever happen but there needs to be an arbitrary process further to the local authority and prior to court where decisions can be made and if necessary any local authority decision overturned. The other problem is that the local authorities are now in bed with the revenue which gives them an added sense of self importance. Local authority cuts must also play a role. The figures I had back from the local authority were simply pulled from a hat, I asked them to justify the figures but oddly enough they've come back with nothing.

 

My case has now been ongoing for a year and all for the princely and disputed sum of @ £2k. I've even offered to pay a negotiated settlement figure without prejudice and/or admitting liability just to make them go away irrespective that I don't even owe the money. However they're not there to negotiate or reason and getting excited about these potential 'fraud' cases is their reason d'etre. I have showed them possession orders, arrears, CCJ's and asked them to apply common sense but it fell on deaf ears.

 

Regards solicitors from my experience of them over the past few years they'll tell you they can act for you then once you're sat down with them they'll tell you no more than you already know and all for £200 an hour. While I appreciate we can't be seen to be referring a solicitor or recommending it would be a good idea to perhaps put forward a few names of solicitors along with experience of same. If someone has had a genuinely good experience with an approachable and amenable legal entity, along with a degree of success, then it would be good to post to the board. I'll post back on how this ends up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have read your story and I am in a similar position as I am facing charges of Benefit fraud for the amount of £60000 between 2000 and 2011.I was in an abusive relationship with someone who has now been diagnosed with a personality disorder.During that time we lived together and I claimed for him as a dependant because he would continually disappear with our money.Before that when it was paid to him,he kept the housing benefit and we were threatened with eviction,so I claimed for HIM so I could get housing benefit in my name thus securing a tenancy for myself.To cut a long story short I started working part time 7 hours a week for months then it went up a bit more.He in the meantime got us in a load of debt,so even though I was working I wasnt gaining anything at all.Because it was cash in hand I didnt declare it,thus leading me into a vicious circle.I was totally ignorant of the fact that I was entitled to tax credits,and it is only now that I am claiming them.I am no longer with this parasite and I take full responsibility for the mess I am in.Ironically my tax credits are more than my wage(I still work at the same place}.As you can imagine I am so worried about the outcome.Could someone answer this question for me will they take into account the amount of tax credits I would have been entitled to during that period but didnt claim when all this goes to Crown Court?I let it go on for so long because I was more or less intimidated by him.He would threaten to tell the Social I was working if I didnt give him any money etc,etc and it was only in 2009 that I got the courage to leave him and I am still recieving demands from various debtors for him that I knew nothing about.I dont want sympathy just advice if anyone can give me any.No amount of money is worth the shame that I am going through now,but at least I have gained something from this I have learned a hard lesson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patnay

In my case what I found was that the LA are there to protect other tax payers and as such you can not take them to court, however this doesn't make them above the law. However there is the Local Government Ombudsman you can go to once a complaints process has been exhausted via the LA. Are you in a mortgaged property or rented/council accommodation. If you were in a vulnerable position then the LA are duty bound to take an objective view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go and take some legal advice if I were you - find yourself a lawyer with Benefits knowledge - ideally a Benefits Specialist lawyer. A "normal" criminal lawyer will lack the necessary knowledge to be able to assist you effectively. You need to find yourself said solicitor rapidly.

 

They will not take into account any underlying entitlements (as the T/C will be called) - it's not in their nature to do so. You, and your lawyer, will have to raise this point with them and calculate the underlying entitlement. This is likely to make a significant difference to your alleged "overpayment".

 

It might be prudent to get the rates of benefits for the years concerned (TC's weren't about in 2000, if I recall) and calculate your own underlying entitlement - it's likely to be fairly significant if you were only working a little bit and your 'partner' was unemployed.

 

However, you have got a little bit of a sticky situation insofar as you have declared this work was "cash in hand" and not declared - that point will be picked up on by the Prosecution and they'll use that as additional evidence that the fraud was deliberate, pre-planned and long-term which will not look good on you in Court - especially Crown.

 

The matters of the parasite and his actions upon you are fairly strong mitigating circumstances and need to be raised with your brief. If this is going to Crown (likely, with the alleged amount involved) then you'll be entitled to Legal Aid if you're on benefits and will most likely end up with a barrister to represent you.

 

If there's any help or advice you would like from me, please feel free to take it offline of the thread and PM me - for obvious reasons I can't say too much on a public thread like this.

 

Definitely, definitely get a lawyer - a good one at that. Soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply just telling someone has helped me.I do have a lawyer and have already been to the Magistrates Court but no plea has been entered because I am disputing the amount.,and yes its going to Crown Court.I only had cash in hand for a few weeks then went on the "Books""at work using my maiden name.I suppose secretly I hoped to be called in any time to sort this mess but I never was.I can get my details from work regarding how much I earned each year to find out about tax credits I was entitled to,my boss is fully supportive of me.I have been in touch with housing benefit overpayments because I have been told that my ex will be liable for council tax overpayment whilst he lived with me so that will decrease the amount as well.I still have limited contact with him and he is now making threatening calls to me and my place of work because I blame him for a lot of this and he knows that I will be revealing his abuse as part of my defence. so I am logging all this down.I dont know how to message you privately as it says I must have 15 posts but once again thanks for your advice CHR71 I will keep you informed privately as soon as I can

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply just telling someone has helped me.I do have a lawyer and have already been to the Magistrates Court but no plea has been entered because I am disputing the amount.,and yes its going to Crown Court.I only had cash in hand for a few weeks then went on the "Books""at work using my maiden name.I suppose secretly I hoped to be called in any time to sort this mess but I never was.I can get my details from work regarding how much I earned each year to find out about tax credits I was entitled to,my boss is fully supportive of me.I have been in touch with housing benefit overpayments because I have been told that my ex will be liable for council tax overpayment whilst he lived with me so that will decrease the amount as well.I still have limited contact with him and he is now making threatening calls to me and my place of work because I blame him for a lot of this and he knows that I will be revealing his abuse as part of my defence. so I am logging all this down.I dont know how to message you privately as it says I must have 15 posts but once again thanks for your advice CHR71 I will keep you informed privately as soon as I can

 

It is important to get some protection for yourself, as well - report these abusive and harrassing phone calls and don't let the bully win. Please report these to the Police.

 

Entering "No Plea" was a way to get this to Crown, and get you some good representation. Make sure that representation has got Benefit knowledge and experience - this will become increasingly important going forwards, listen to them and take their advice. A criminal lawyer at this stage may work to your disadvantage. This needs specialist knowledge.

 

I really do wish you luck. I feel for you, truly I do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

This is just an update really on the last thread regarding my imminent court appearance for benefit fraud.I appeared at Mold Crown and was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment.I had an exemplary probation report but to no avail.Thankfully I only had to serve 10 weeks in Styal, I was released last week on tag.What a nightmare.Now I have the problem that my job is still available to me (nights) but my curfew wont allow it so I have to claim benefits until I can return to work!!Im still in trauma and my poor family went through hell but it is over now Thank God.Thanks for your advicex

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll add my tuppence. I pleaded guilty to benefit fraud from the outset when questioned by the police after being arrested in a dawn raid at my home.

 

We were so short of money, I mean really short - couldn't pay any bills and the home was under threat of being taken off us.

The children were both under 5 at the time.

 

The business I was running was losing money hand over fist, but I just hung in there hoping that somehow I could turn it round.

 

After not being able to buy any food shopping one weekend I decided to claim JSA Income based. I failed to tell them about the business as I couldn't see the reason as it wasn't making any money irrespective of how many hours I worked in it. All of the takings were going out in rent and overheads/costs.

 

Anyhow after about 18 months I got copped by the Social for working and claiming. I admitted it all and showed them that the business had not made any money for the past 18 months although I was working upwards of 40 hours a week in it.

 

Eventually Regina decided to move it to Crown Court due to the amount involved - about £13,000. Some 8 months later I went to Crown pleaded guilty, was told by the Judge that I was a 'parasite on society' and was sent down for 6 months and order to repay the £13,000.

 

I served half of my sentence inside. When I came out, the house had been taken, and all of my goods had been siezed by the bailiffs for other debts.

 

Back to now, I am still having a third of my benefits taken off me and I try to survive. We were home less and slept anywhere throughout one winter.

Still owe £1,000's with no hope of ever getting a job as an ex con.

 

So yes, they destroyed my wife's life, my children's lives. They were simply the collateral damage that came with what I did.

 

Now I only have the ability to cause aggravation and annoyance to the DWP left in me.

At least one little bit of me knows that it is costing the DWP/Government £1,000's in extra time spent trying to untangle things I do with my claims for benefits as well as to take every decision made by the DWP to the Tribunal which I know also costs them £1,000's

I never win, but the feeling of using up their money gives me a bigger satisfaction.

 

I have no idea how much it has cost the government so far but it must be getting on for over £10,000. When I feel that i have reached the £13,000 mark, I'll knock it on the head.

It's my only way of hitting back at them for failing to see that I had no choice, had no income and fell foul of only the 16 hour working rule.

 

Looking back now, I could have claimed WTC and probably would have been no worse off than JSA. But I didn't know I could, and no one told me what to do.

Edited by gregbythesea
Link to post
Share on other sites

If your business was making no money, you also had the option of council tax benefit and housing benefit.

 

Housing benefit was not an option as our home at the time was on a mortgage.

 

I did claim Council Tax Benefit, and was up front with them all the way. Even to the point of proving that the business was not earning us any money. They have never prosecuted. It seems that I was entitled to it due to low income, shame the DWP couldn't see it that way!

 

All of their argument was about signing on as available for work when I wasn't as I was working full time in the business. They never once disagreed with the fact that I was entitled to help due to having no income, they only concerned themselves that claiming JSA wasn't the correct way of going about it.

 

I did try the CAB at the time but could never get in to see them. I actually asked when I made the telephone JSA claim if having a non earning business would be a problem and was told it wasn't so I never bothered to enter it.

 

Nobody ever mentioned the 16 hour rule to me or any other method of trying to get some money coming in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just an update really on the last thread regarding my imminent court appearance for benefit fraud.I appeared at Mold Crown and was sentenced to 10 months imprisonment.I had an exemplary probation report but to no avail.Thankfully I only had to serve 10 weeks in Styal, I was released last week on tag.What a nightmare.Now I have the problem that my job is still available to me (nights) but my curfew wont allow it so I have to claim benefits until I can return to work!!Im still in trauma and my poor family went through hell but it is over now Thank God.Thanks for your advicex

 

Thanks for the update, and welcome back!

 

If you can prove the job is still available to you, then you can get permission from Styal to vary the curfew hours - they are unlikely to refuse such a request because of the rehabilitation that working will give you. Give them a ring and ask - there's a specialist department for it (the HDC Department) that deals with this kind of request and you'll receive a favourable response, I think.

 

Very, very well done on being able to keep your job - something that's normally very difficult when there's a conviction in the mix. If you need insurance (you'll find you're excluded from the 'main market' - read the T's and C's before signing up - they all exclude unspent convictions - even if the proposer is not the one with the conviction) then a company I found through UNLOCK (unlock.org) in Peterborough quoted some very sensible rates indeed and offered good value cover.

 

UNLOCK is worth joining, too for support - every member there is in the same boat as you and there's a lot of advice there to help you get back on your feet.

 

NACRO is also worth joining (both freebies), too - plenty of work-related support on there.

 

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is the most heartbreaking on this site I have seen. I know it's pointless saying it but I will anyway, but why are these people doing prison time when others that knowingly defraud tax credits for even way more don't even get to the point of an interview under caution let alone court? I rarely come on here now as this & this alone bothers me. I signed into my old email account & had an email about an update to this thread.

I can't also fathom how someone has to pay back thousands when they can prove they made no income from their business whilst they were claiming these benefits fraudulently.

The whole system is completely ass about face???

And I am also glad of this ..'I have no idea how much it has cost the government so far but it must be getting on for over £10,000. When I feel that i have reached the £13,000 mark, I'll knock it on the head.'

Have tears in my eyes reading these last few posts. It all sucks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...