Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA sold debt without ever producing any paperwork whatsoever.


MW2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick update,received a letter today from Experto claiming that both themselves and MBNA would of notified me of the sale of the debt,which MBNA NEVER did,and they will arrange to obtain a copy of the relevant documentation from MBNA and will follow up with them regarding my PPI dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi just got my sar from mbna and they've only supplied the last 6 years, this seems to be industry standard, by this time I had cancelled my ppi, is there a way of getting this info from them? Also sar states sold to experto on the 19 th may but default gave me until 25 may to resolve? Agreement is an application form with a 2 page document attached saying terms and conditions but no prescribed terms anywhere on this document, on the application form I filled in it states " I have received a copy of terms and conditions and agree to bound by these" , how could I of received them when it's an application for a credit card? Also attached a 4-5 page separate document containig prescribed terms and conditions but stating charge of £12for missed payments, but statement shows charges of £25 so can't be the t&c at time of application, any thoughts appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MW2 Hi,6 years is the standard the banks say for retaining statements,,we know this to be untrue as many Caggers have ha d to their surprise 10+ years,however write them and and say as they are unwilling to supply the PPI details you will have to estimate the payments and add interest.

 

The fact that MBNA sold the debt on the 19th but gave you until the 25th to resolve,this appears common with MBNA add to the letter to Experto the company they claim to represent who you have never heard of have purchased a debt 6 days before your default date expired and suggest they return the purchased debt to MBNA

 

Further add to the letter in the absence of a Letter of Assignment from MBNA and a letter of Assignment from Varde they must be aware this is unacceptable and refer them to the 1925 act

 

Also add that if they think an application form and the wrong T&Cs complies with the CCA request,suggest they think again and ask them to read the OFT guidelines regarding DCAs

 

 

Further add the charges of £25 (add up the total amount value) claim all these back.

 

Finally try "as the account is in such a mess and contravenes so many OFT guidelines"suggest they write it of and should their response be deemed unacceptable by yourself,apart from full refunds of all PPI + interest,full refunds of all charges + interest the OFT,TS, will be involved(you should involve them )

 

good luck FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for that will get on with it, at least I know why they wouldn't send me my agreement, because they don't have one!! I noticed as well that nowhere on the application form does it mention attached or otherwise t&c except the part above where it says I've already received them before I've applied!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very similar but my application form is different to yours, but the same in as much no mention of any t& c overleaf or mention of them at all for that matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Update: received a letter from experto with what they say is my agreement, basically a blank form with my name printed on it, but also a letter to say they probably couldn't enforce it and how would like to start payments to them!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MW2 nice letter from Experto no agreement cant enforce it ,how would you like to pay.This is just typical of them.

 

Remember a lot earlier in your thread I asked the question,Why would you pay somebody (Experto) who you have never heard of who say they represent (Varde) who you have never heard of,if I said I represented(BrandX) would you pay me any money,I dont think so.

 

They admit anyway they cant enforce the agreement.I would just ignore them and wait to see what their next move is,as at the present time there are so many ???? they cant answer.Just be wary of Probably Cant Enforce It

 

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no probably about it, they could put anybody's name and address on a blanc form and say you owe us xx, surely?

What is strange is I have had my original application form from mbna themselves but what expert have sent isn't even the same one!!!

But as you say ignore!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

MW2 Full&Final a good route,I doubt they will go for 10% but well worth a try

 

BEFORE you go for F&F, believe me its a minefield, read the Blogs on site on this subject,get it wrong and the debt will come back and bite you.The balance can get sold to another DCA to make your life a misery.

 

The Blog by Sequencis is well worth a good read

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today received a letter from IND Ltd saying pay by the 20th July or we WILL start proceedings in court.

Is it worth replying with the information about the PPI claiim and the agreement being an application form with no prescribed terms and conditions, from looking around the site they tend to follow through with their threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well a quick update....no court action as of yet, sent them a copy of the letter from experto stating they probably couldnt enforce in court and its all gone quiet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Quick update........Aktiv Capital have now purchased debt and have instructed Experto to contact me again............that would be the same Experto that sent me a nice letter about probably not enforceable then!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...