Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
    • Hi Clou, Welcome to the Forum and thank you for reading first before you posted. There seems to be many problems with Cornwall and getting a signal to use your a phone which could be why these parking companies don't use alternatives. It is a shame you paid the first one as you would probably have not had to pay that one either.  Was the car park at which you paid the same parking company as the one sending you these PCNs? On the subject of PCNs could you please post them up so we can see if they comply with the Act.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Distance selling Regs and eBay?


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4886 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A Paris Commercial Court awarded a 40 million Euro damage claim against eBay, eventually reduced to 5.7 million on appeal, because of the failure to prevent the sale of trade marked goods on the site, and then again a further fine of 1.7 million Euro, December 2009 because the sellers continued to advertise the goods.

 

eBay's defence was basically that "ebay does not supply any goods", which would seem to have not been so wise with hindsight.

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today I learnt something new about the Distance Selling Regulations. If you read an advert on the Internet in the comfort of your home, contact the seller and then go to view and purchase the advertised goods, i.e. a caravan, you are covered by the Distance Selling Regulations as it is deemed that the contract commenced at your residence although finalised at the seller's premises. This applies to traders only. I suppose that in additon to the Sales of Goods Act this gives you more protection if requesting a refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Distance Selling Regulations and the the Sale of Goods Act apply to contracts only. The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 is the statute to apply to a trader, because the Regulations define offences.

 

The right to cancel provided by the Distance Selling Regulations is therefore an alternative to the Sale of Goods Act rather than an addition. With the contract cancelled there is no contract to apply the Sale of Goods Act to. From there on the cancelled contract counts only to the extent that the Regulations refer to it.

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SOGA and the DSRs apply to the extent that a contract exists and to the extent that the contract is legitimate, as per section 3 of the Sale of Goods Act.

 

The CPUTRs apply to the practice of a trader in general and may thus apply to advertising, with no consumer yet involved as an actual buyer.

 

Section 10(2) of the DSRs is the part they miss when the punters in their ignorance expect to cancel a contract while continuing to complain about the quality of the goods or the fact that goods were not delivered: On eBay for instance the correct way to go about it is for a seller to declare a mutual agreement to discontinue the transaction. The incorrect way to go about it is to claim to have cancelled the contract and to also proceed to the Paypal Dispute Resolution Centre to complain about the performance of a contract.

 

(2) Except as otherwise provided by these Regulations, the effect of a notice of cancellation is that the contract shall be treated as if it had not been made.
To complain that goods paid for were not delivered or to complain that the goods were bad is to treat the contract as if it had been made.

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much the entirety of that original posting is wrong.

 

If you read an advertisement on the Internet and then proceed to finalise the contract when you go to see the goods the Distance Selling Regulations would not apply because the Regulations apply to a contract concluded at a distance and the finalisation of a contract is the conclusion of it.

 

"concluded" is the key term, not "commenced".

 

If, on the other hand, you agree to a seller's terms online and promise to purchase it would make no difference if you go to collect the goods and pay in cash so long as the deal was already done, with no caveat for instance that you wish to inspect the goods before you agree to pay. If that's the case the contract of sale would not be concluded.

 

 

distance contract” means any contract concerning goods or services concluded between a supplier and a consumer under an organised distance sales or service provision scheme run by the supplier who, for the purpose of the contract, makes exclusive use of one or more means of distance communication up to and including the moment at which the contract is concluded;

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2000/2334/regulation/3/made
Link to post
Share on other sites

You have absolutely no comprehension of the law and on numerous post you offer incorrect advice. I am not even going to bother to argue this one with you as it just goes over your head and even when presaented with facts contrary to your view, you decdie you are always correct anyway..

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those sufficiently blessed with an adequate comprehension of English there was nothing so new to learn about about the Distance Selling Regulations anyway, except to have failed to bother to read them.

 

The statute came to force a full ten years ago [31 October 2000] and was not since amended, except that Part 8 of the Enterprise Act subsequently defined how the consumer protection legislation must be construed, in general.

 

Those are the facts of the matter.

 

8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

For good measure, section 210 of the Enterprise Act is to be found here:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/40/section/210

 

If anybody has anything to say on the subject it may as well be said here and now, to refer back to instead of disrupting thread after thread.

 

The definition of a consumer applies by way of 212(4):

 

References to a listed Directive or to a listed Regulation must be construed in accordance with section 210.
With regard the DSRs the listed Directive is 1997/7/EC

 

The usual point of contention is that a business includes

 

© any undertaking in the course of which goods or services are supplied otherwise than free of charge.
8-)
Link to post
Share on other sites

There was already a thread on "Distance selling Regs and eBay?"

 

See posting #6.

 

Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 may be applied to invitations to buy but with no actual acceptance of a supplier's offer to sell. The DSRs and the SOGA apply to a contract.

 

8)

Edited by perplexity
Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I learnt something new about the Distance Selling Regulations. If you read an advert on the Internet in the comfort of your home, contact the seller and then go to view and purchase the advertised goods, i.e. a caravan, you are covered by the Distance Selling Regulations as it is deemed that the contract commenced at your residence although finalised at the seller's premises. This applies to traders only. I suppose that in additon to the Sales of Goods Act this gives you more protection if requesting a refund.

 

If they had followed it up by phone, email etc, maybe but not if the contract is made on the Trader premises. If the caravan is away from the Traders usual premises it may apply depending on the circumstances so it's by no means clear cut.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...