Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA.  I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPCM to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and it is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week.
    • It probably deletes after a certain time. What a shame you did not check at the time. However I have no doubt that there was a PCN envelope under your windscreen wiper  as shown quite clearly on one of the photographs. . It would seem strange that it was placed there empty hence the reason I stated a second Notice was issued [though not necessarily sent. As I said in that letter to IPC that was not what the complaint was about and probably  IPC will ask about that at the same time if they accept you  going direct to IPC for the other matter. It is immaterial how many original PCNs were issued or not issued. You are able to show the two that you have from their sar one of which coincides with the one you received in the post and that is the one that does not agree with the date times of PoFA. Thus breaching not only the Act, but also the IPC  Code of Conduct and the ability of UKPCM to obtain data from the DVLA. So leave that part of the letter as good to go. However as it is as Dave [Thank you Dave!} pointed out that it is UKPCM and not UKPCI have amended the letter and posted it below.
    • Its based on 10% annual depreciation, divided by 52 weeks and then x the excess number of weeks that they have had the vehicle for, after the agreed initial 3 week repair.
    • LOL LOL LOL Don't need that many to deport a handful of volunteers - at best Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show Cant have hundreds of well paid people in a department deporting a single volunteer when we have an upcoming election to lose now can we - VIPal drenched in riches and departments full of pals well paid for doing nowt will 'sadly soon be history - was rumored to in a text from a soon to be ex-minister texting in from one of his main jobs in a number of industries he will soon be unable to help.   Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show  
    • try it.... use recuva or file scavenger or glary utils
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sky's big foul up.........


Jaffa1a
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4980 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently signed up with sky for the whole package, TV, Broadband and Phone line.

 

they came and fitted the dish and box, left our 30 litre water butt on its side in the garden creating an all mighty mess which my poor aged mother was left to find (they didn't inform us of this). The water butt contained three years of water and silt so you can imagine the mess and stench. They also gouged a mark in the wallpaper and for this i got two months free viewing (£40 wow!)

 

On the 16th August my phoneline went "live". I should explain that we had two lines coming into the house, mine and my mothers, and this was to be kept as two lines and i explained it thoroughly to the agent on the phone.

 

So next day tried to phone my mother from work....no answer so i called my number and yep you guessed it she answered straight away on her phone and not mine. Called Sky to say they had mixed up the lines, they informed me that no it was the correct number and that they can't check mums number as they didn't own it. called mums supplier..talk talk..to be told that sky had requested to take over her number and not mine and i was still a customer of theirs.

 

Fast forward two weeks and numerous phone calls, lost my rag and asked to speak to a manager only to be told there is not one available, i used to work in a call centre so i know that there are always managers available!

 

Now have been restricted by talk talk as the bill has not been paid, i was not aware of this till after the issues started with sky and i though i was no longer with them. Talk talk want £150 to disconnect my line and still have not disconnected it. so when i call mum from work i get my old line and cannot get through and if mum phones me from home she an get through on her sky line.

 

Spoke to BT in desperation as it was their engineers who did the work only to be told that i shouldn't have left BT then should i.

 

The lot of them are woefully inadequate and really need a big kick up the backside. Can't cancel as i'm a new customer.....and to add insult to injury they sent me a paper bill dated 10th september which i received on the 23rd to be told that payment will be taken on the 24th and they will not pay my bank charges.

 

Am in the process of writing to both sky and Talk talk to get this sorted out, my mother is 76 and has a sick sister who she cannot call as there are certain numbers that have been restricted by talk talk......if you are confused join the club because so am i!:???::evil::???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sympathise, I really do. Sometimes they deserve to be sued for creating chaos where peace once was - isn't it time consumers banded together to take on everyone who is supposed to be providing a service and failing to meet a standard.

 

Companies need to be shown providing a hassle free service matters and if they are not up to the task, penalties should ensue.

 

They are quick to take payment for shoddy service and will heap on charges if a dispute arises or payments are late, what if the consumer were to add charges for their lack of providing the service expected and paid for, maybe they would change their tactics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky do not add extra charges for anything including late payments.

 

It is very confusing what has happened and have read your post a few times as still do not 100% understand.

 

You have 2 lines in the house, your and your mums,

 

your no should have changed to sky and leave your mums with talk talk?

 

but they got it the wrong way round?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky do not add extra charges for anything including late payments.

 

It is very confusing what has happened and have read your post a few times as still do not 100% understand.

 

You have 2 lines in the house, your and your mums,

 

your no should have changed to sky and leave your mums with talk talk?

 

but they got it the wrong way round?

 

Yes that is correct, we now have two lines with the same number, one with sky and one with talk talk. The talk talk line is restricted so cannot call out on it but the sky one is fine. But only certain numbers restricted, so for example can call my sister who lives in the same twon, but not my best friend or my mothers friends. Mum can call me at work but i can't call her from work. It is very confusing and as i said a big foul-up!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

and you both had different telephone numbers that you were each paying a seperate line rental for or

 

was it one line where you paid additional (not full price line rental) for a secondary number (basically one line that had 2 phones attached and dependant on which number was rung that particular phone would ring)

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and you both had different telephone numbers that you were each paying a seperate line rental for or

 

was it one line where you paid additional (not full price line rental) for a secondary number (basically one line that had 2 phones attached and dependant on which number was rung that particular phone would ring)

 

Yes we both had different telephone numbers and paid seperate line rentals, with different accounts with talk talk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically the op that dealt with the skytalk order failed to double check the actual telephone number you wanted skytalk on.

 

Very basic detail that is the most important.

 

There is simply no excuse for that at all.

 

Now fixing it will be a problem.

 

For your mum's line she will need to ask talk talk to take it back.

 

What sky will probarbly need to so is to calss your as a new line provide i.e. provide a new linw but with your old number but this will take time unfortunatley but i am unsure if there is anyway quicker for them to do this.

 

Although you say you are writing to sky, may i suggest you email them as well via their online complaints, due to the nature this should be escalated to someone who can get this in process for you asap to try and get this sorted so you can at least get the lines sorted.

 

And then let them deal with your complaint and any costs you have incurred and compensation.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx for the advice, will email them tomorrow as suggested. Mum's old line has been disconnected by talk talk so we will have to call them to sort that one out.

 

At the moment i have been charged approx £30 for the calls to their "customer services" as well as the charges from my bank due to non-payment so they will have a hefty bill from me.....i will expect compensation for my inconvenience too!!!!

 

I refuse to call them anymore as have found out they charge 20p per minute and deliberately keep you on hold for as long as possible..1 and half hours one night.........disgraceful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the cost of the call is dependant on the call carrier you are calling from.

 

The sky line will cost you nothing to call them.

 

IF you have skytalk unlimited - no cost at all

 

skytalk freetime is free after 7 pm

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...