Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There is so much wrong with their WS. You stopped for a very short time yet she seems to equate that as being parked! That flies in the face of what parking means. There have been several cases in Court where Judges have defined the meaning of parked. Not one of them describes it as stopping for a few minutes with the engine running and the driver remaining in the vehicle. And why on earth is POFA being included on s28? The airport comes under Byelaws and that land is specifically not covered by POFA. Then on s30 she cites  Parking Eye v Beavis talking aboiut establishing a contract between the parking company and the motorist to park! then from s33 to s40 they are trying to bamboozle the Court by trying to minimise the effect of the Byelaws.It is the borough of Southend on Sea that decides the rules there- https://d1z15fh6odiy9s.cloudfront.net/files/sen-byelaws-1983-297c76b8. S12 and s13 confirm that the signs erected by the Council are the ones to be observed.   s46 The claimant submits the signs are not prohibitive!  The dictionary description of" Prohibitive"- (of a law or rule) forbidding or restricting something.  If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck...Is she dumb or what. s47 Further misdirection-this is nothing to do with parking s48 refers to the" lawful occupier" not the landowner which is Southend Council.  I end up going back to s5 which gives the impression that VCS complies totally with  their Code of Practice and therefore you, the motorist must be guilty. yet Time and time again VCS loses in Court because they have not complied with their CoP. The Parking Prankster indicates some of them.  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2017/02/ and in the case below they took someone to Court knowing that they did not have the right to take this person to Court at all. http://nebula.wsimg.com/e3da92cb966c72de63ec1f98605c2954?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1   VCS v Ms O C8DP9D8C Birmingham 1/8/2017 this was taking a motorist to Court  when the contract for the car park was down to Excel. VCS have lost many cases in Court knowing that they did not have the right to sue as there was no contract between them and motorists-total breach of their CoP and should have put their ability to access motorists data  were it not for the weakness of DVLA and the IPC. VCS v Ms M. 3QZ53955 25/01/2016 Claim discontinued. Costs awarded to motorist. as above-masquerading as Excel yet again.
    • Public backs debt enforcement to support vital public services - survey | CIVEA View the full article
    • Hi   Welcome to CAG   Please be patient I am sure others will be along to offer you there wisdom.   Looking after someone else's child: https://www.gov.uk/looking-after-someone-elses-child   Can I also say that you should be proud at taking the children on and looking after them due to the circumstances for such a long time.        
    • it means that the bundle going to the court is ONE BUNDLE, from BOTH of you and it must be with the court 48hrs before the hearing. so your WS needs to be sent to their solicitors only.   pers i'd wait theirs , its their responsibilty to ensure the deadline of a single bundle to the court issent. all you do iss tate yours is ready please forward me your WD and i will reciprocate, but don't as we need to see theirs to form yours or more importantly fine tune it.   there are 2 email ad's on the court letter have you sent an email yet to the correct one with your phone/email details regarding the hearing ASAP.  
    • The CMA has today published further detail on its views on the law in relation to cancellations and refunds during the pandemic. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

TOWER CAPITAL have tricked me

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3653 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

neilsbox_chart.gif Thread Stats

neilsbox_eyes.gif Views:




Wmouth.pngW Factor

Coming Soon...



Share This Thread:


.fb_share_no_count { DISPLAY: block !important}tweet.jpg






OK so basically I have an ongoing dispute with TOWER CAPITAL LIMITED, I took a payday loan out with them some time ago & I defaulted on the payments.


I asked if I can pay £20 per month (£250 outstanding balance) and they said that if I increased the payments to £50 per month they would not take any further action (meaning no register a CCJ against me!)


So I set up a standing order thinking everything was OK with the payments, my first one came out 1st September ok and cleared, I then receive papers from the court about a CCJ being registered against me, I had filled in forms I had received from the Money Claim Online that they did, but they said I should fill these forms in and send back and then if I keep to my £50 they would not register a CCJ against me, and they have done.


I am really angry about this, and they just don’t seem to be helping me, I have evidence that they have said this and confirmed to me many times that they will not register a CCJ.


I feel tricked and deceived by them!


I have put in a complaint with the Financial Ombudsman and also have sent a letter to Northampton Court with emails from TOWER CAPITAL attached.


What else can I do to get this CCJ removed?


I am desperately trying to clear debt and get back on straight and this has really set me back a lot!




Wish I was rich....... :(:(

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...