Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shocking costs created by Tory led Government in 2012. Taxpayers brace for £100bn money-printing bill – as George Osborne says it’s ‘not my responsibility’ MSN WWW.MSN.COM  
    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stef v's Abbey Mortgages


rascal3103
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I do not have a court date yet rascal.

 

The amended defence has been allowed and I received a copy this morning. The Judge ordered it should be filed and served by 5 January after which he woud issue directions. I expect either an allocation hearing or a court date sometime after that.

 

I am tempted to file my reply to it this week and send DLA a copy, then sit back and see what they come up with.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Rascal,

 

I am not sure whether this helps, but in July 2004 we moved to New Zealand and sold our house we were charged a PRC of $7500. We wrote letters to the Lord Burns

Chairman, Chairman’s Head Office, Mr Luqman Arnold, Chief Executive and Angus Porter - Customer Director anyway to cut a long story short we got a letter back from Bill Tarbuck - Asstant Manager - Regulated and Final Stage Complaints - quote

'I have not investigated your concerns at this final stage of our internal complaints procedure.

I have reviewed available correspondence and history of your account. In november 2003 you arranged a mortgage on product FD003, 4.65% for five year fixed rate to the 2 November 2007. Your mortgage offer dated 25th November 2002, included a condition that a Product Related Charge (PRC) equal to 290 days interest at the fixed rate, would be made on any amount repaid or transferred prior to the 2 November 2007. There is no provision in the contract for a reduction in the PENALTY based on the length of time the mortgage is held. Whilst I sam sympathetic to your circumstances, I do not feel that Abbey is any way responsible for them. All we are now doing is asking you to comply with your obligations under a contrct into which you freely entered, in the same way that, very properly, you would expect us to comply with our obligations under the contract.

I apprciate this decision will come as a disappointment to you. However, I regret to inform you that our internal complaints procedure has not been exhausted. This entitles you to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. They may consider your complaint as long as it falls with their rules, and as long as you refer it to them with 6 months of the date of this letter. I enclose a copy of the Financial Ombudsman Serviecs leaflet for your reference. I should also mention that as the complaints procedure is now exhausted, the Company cannot enter into further correspondence with you on this matter.

Yours sincerely...'

I'm not sure whether this helps the cases against the shabby Abbey but this guy has admitted it is a Penalty maybe this has implications for all parties??? Not sure.

Cheers, Em

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ehealey,

 

I am not legally up on everything so I dont know how this affect things, maybe a mod could look at this ??

 

But, if you still have a copy of the letter then I am sure it would come in useful for the court bundle, if only to point out to the judge that the Shabby themselves consider it a penalty. I would appreciate a copy if that is possible, obviously with your details removed.

 

Regards

 

Rascal

Spanish Holiday Rental - 10% off BAG and CAG Members

www.rent-in-spain.org.uk

 

 

Progress so far:

 

Yorkshire Bank - LBA 26/07/06 £1001.00 - £500.50 offered and rejected

RBS Credit Card - Settled £200.00

Sainsburys - Settled in full £100.00

JD WIlliams - Settled in full £50.00

Argos Card Services - £98 - offered £60 and rejected.

Abbey Mortgages - MCOL 2nd October - Deadline 21st

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Well I recieved a let from DLA Piper today, they have copied the page from here that is advising no new ERC claims, stating the costs are already high, and will increasu substantially if i continue to court.

 

Under my mortgage agreement I could be liable for all costs, even though I am on the small claims track and my mortgage finished 6 years ago.

 

They have offered me the chance to walk away with nothing if I send my notice of discontinuence to the court now.

 

As much as it pains me to do so I think this is the action I will take, I am not confident enough in myself to argue a winning case at court, and by looking at the others cases before me, I do not think I will win anyway.

 

Thanks to all you who helped along the way, especially Zoot, Les Gun and Tamadus. All those who have taken the choice to continue, good luck and I hope you win.

 

Regards

 

Stef (Rascal3103)

Spanish Holiday Rental - 10% off BAG and CAG Members

www.rent-in-spain.org.uk

 

 

Progress so far:

 

Yorkshire Bank - LBA 26/07/06 £1001.00 - £500.50 offered and rejected

RBS Credit Card - Settled £200.00

Sainsburys - Settled in full £100.00

JD WIlliams - Settled in full £50.00

Argos Card Services - £98 - offered £60 and rejected.

Abbey Mortgages - MCOL 2nd October - Deadline 21st

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the identical letter myself this week Rascal.

 

Trouble is any costs are limited on small claims track so I am ready to argue the case with them next month.

 

If however they would like to send me a cheque to save them the embarrasment of losing in court then I might accept it.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand they can only charge us travel expenses, but as I understand it the mortgage terms highlights a section that if they have to defend a claim agains a client then they can ask for costs, even if it is in the small claims court.

 

If the judge thinks you are taking the case to court without a real legal argument then he can still order you pay costs, and the letter states they will seek a cost order.

 

I am not clued up enough to know what I am and am not liable for.

Spanish Holiday Rental - 10% off BAG and CAG Members

www.rent-in-spain.org.uk

 

 

Progress so far:

 

Yorkshire Bank - LBA 26/07/06 £1001.00 - £500.50 offered and rejected

RBS Credit Card - Settled £200.00

Sainsburys - Settled in full £100.00

JD WIlliams - Settled in full £50.00

Argos Card Services - £98 - offered £60 and rejected.

Abbey Mortgages - MCOL 2nd October - Deadline 21st

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rascal,

 

 

as I understand it the mortgage terms highlights a section that if they have to defend a claim agains a client then they can ask for costs, even if it is in the small claims court.

 

Do you have the wording of that contractual clause? Not all clauses cover their legal costs if you sue them and I doubt very much if such a clause would stand up in the small claims court.

 

Although the safest thing would be to withdraw.

 

If the judge thinks you are taking the case to court without a real legal argument then he can still order you pay costs, and the letter states they will seek a cost order.

 

You do have a legal argument so the judge can not order a cost order for acting unreasonably in the small claims court. However, if you are not confident in arguing your case the best thing would be to drop it and the would relieve the hassle and stress associated with bringing a claim.

 

I'm also interested to know what exactly it was from this site they sent out?

 

All the best whatever you decide to do.

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slade,

 

Very new to the forum today, after what I have seen I take it you can claim gainst your previous mortgage company for the early redemption charge, can anyone tewll me where to get the advise of what to do and where to get template letters from? Thankyou

 

 

Its probably best not to see:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/62003-important-mortgage-claimants-please.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...