Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Servere Problem With Ex-Employer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5009 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there,

 

I need some help and advice for an issue my wife is having with her now ex-employer. I've posted briefly on another thread but now I have more information on the issue and feel that starting from the beginning will be the best thing.

 

My wife was moved to a different department at work. As soon as she was moved to the department, she realised something wasn't right. She wasn't included in conversations, ignored when she spoke, not included in team social gatherings, not included in the tea run and so on. As time went on the situation began to affect her quite badly. My wife spoke to her manager to find out what the issue was as it was getting her down. Her manager told her that nothing was wrong with them and it was all her. My wife didn't understand how it could be her as she had tried to get involved in conversations and such but was ignored. After this conversation the situation got worse. As a result, my wife sank in to depression. I lost count of the times she would arrive home after work in tears. As she had to have a couple of hours off of work in the morning due to having to go to the doctor regarding her depression under company policy this required her to make up the time. My wife's manager would shout across the office in an agressive manner regarding the time that needed to be made up and that it needed to be made up immediately. But at the same time the manager would quietly speak to someone else, that owed time, in a sympathetic manner and ask them if there was a time that was convenient for them to make it up. My wife saw this a totally unfair. On her next visit to the doctor, my wife was told that he would sign her off of work in order to have a break as the situation wasn't doing anything to help her depression. Upon speaking to the Human Resources manager at work, my wife was told "What's the point in taking time off? You'll still be depressed when you come back." The weeks went by and the situation stayed the same. My wife went over her manager's head and spoke to one of the directors. The director, without even speaking to my wife's manager, said that nothing was going on and it's in her head. My wife managed to convince the director to speak to her manager. Unsurprisingly, when the director got back to my wife, he said that her manager had said that it was my wife's fault and it was her attitude that was the problem. A meeting with the HR manager was set up. In the meeting, my wife was told that her depression was NOT caused by the situation at work. She was also by the HR manager that she had never heard anybody say anything bad about my wife and then a few seconds later said that she had heard people saying that they didn't like her. The HR manager contradicted herself again and again. A meeting was then held with the director and my wife's manager. In the meeting, my wife requested to be moved to another department. This request was refused. It was also mentioned in the meeting that it was because she was suffering from depression that was causing the problems, not work. My wife left the meeting and made the decision not to return to work the following week.

 

My wife has kept a record of all the incidents that took place. The above is a condensed version of events but accurate nevertheless. My wife spoke to ACAS. ACAS informed her that it is constructive dismissal and their failure to address her health problems was a violation of the Disability Discrimination Act. ACAS advised my wife to request that she be paid her full month wage as, according to ACAS, she is fully entitled to it. After 7 days, my wife's former employer responded via letter. In the letter, they basically say that it was all her fault and the depression was the problem. She would not be getting her full months wage as she had not worked for it and she would only get what she was owed. She was paid correctly.

 

I've come on here to ask for some advice on what to do next. Thankfully, my wife is starting to feel better now she has left and I'm trying to help her make a case against her former employer.

 

If anybody can offer any thoughts and advice it would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sherinator..... what an awful story. I am glad your wife is starting to feel better. She will need your love and support especially if you proceed to the next step which is Employment Tribunal. However I think if you are contemplating that route that you should also be submitting a grievance to the company. The reason being that compensation can be downgraded if one has not gone in.

 

have you got Legal Protection cover which covers employment disputes? You can find them attached to Home Contents insurance. How long did this go on for and when did she actually first go to the doctor? Any DDA matter may take as the starting point this date. Also what in the nature of the employment private company / government department.

 

You also need to ensure that the DWP is informed that the this incident is recorded as an industrial accident. Read up on what the criterea is though because the nature of the "incident" cover many days and the creeping nature of events are not liked at the DWP. You need to spot one or two main incidents that actually CAUSED the illness eg the manner of being informed of the make up of time... but you and your wife will be better placed to decide which they are.

 

There are time limits in ET cases which are normally 3 months from the last date of the incident ie when she left not intending to come back but this is extended to 6 months if Discrimination matters are grieved.

 

I am sure you will get more posts from others with experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. Please tell your wife that I sympathise with what she and you have gone through. I also had problems at work that made me ill. If your wife could handle a meeting away from work premises, either at home [although I refused to do that myself] or on neutral territory, is that an option?

 

I hope we can help you reach a good outcome from this.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Honeybee,

 

My wife has said that she would be willing to have a meeting on neutral territory but not at home. However, my wife has said that there is nobody at the company to represent her interests because the HR manager is involved in the bullying. I'd also like to add that the HR Manager has no qualifications in HR or had any personnel training.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can raise the grievance. You just write in an state as much and the reasons she is grieving. She doesn't need someone at work representing her when she has you. I just went through a grievance with my wife which ended up in the ET. It was 3 years from start to finish. I had no experience of this type of thing but used as my judgement 'reasonableness.' They were not reasonable we were ALL the time.

 

It is reasonable because they made her ill that they comply with the reasonable request to meet in a neutral location. If your wife can be legally termed 'disabled' ie if the illness lasts, is likely to last 12 month or more it can come under the protection of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Look it up. You need to cite the DDA in any correspondence and hopefully the gates will open as they have to make 'reasonable adjustments to PCP's ie policy, customs and practice. If they come back to you and say we don't normally do it that way... then reply..... so what it is a policy custom or practice and you can change them in this case because it would be unlawful if you didn't. You just have to be sure that your wife's illness can legally be termed a disability. Phone up the Equality and Human Rights Commission and ask for their link to the DDA codes of practice and read it. At the end the definition of what a disability is is in there. Here is the DDA http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/50/contents but there is better info in the codes.

 

I indicated above the problems with not raising a grievance. The ET date doesn't start until the end of the grievance so it gives time to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...