Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Defaults on my account that are satisified ??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4964 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

These are due to drop off next year (2011) I believe as the actual date of default according to the report was 2005?

 

I have been reading on here and noticed people saying if they are satisified that they should not be there. One was a partial settlement however and the others i *think* were paid in full or settlements also.

 

I included a pic of the defaults as they appear on my report. Can anyone advise please?

 

http://i34.tinypic.com/k9avxg.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Jason King

From what I gather, even though they are satisfied they remain on your file for the 6 years, just like a CCJ, although prospective lenders will be able to see they are satisfied.

 

I've not heard of Defaults being removed just on the basis they have eventually been satisfied unless, of course, one has negotiated with the lender to ask them to remove them, which is tough going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

correct.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm thanks guys. It has left me with a few questions which I am unsure of.

 

 

  1. I thought I could just ask them for the original agreement and then have it removed when they cannot produce it. I am guessing nothing can be done because as it is satisfied they do not have to comply with a CCA request. However could I not just send them a SAR request and do it from there?
  2. Are my calculations correct, it is the date on the credit report you count 6 years from (ie 10/06/2005 > 10/06/2011) ?
  3. If a DCA started to bill me before the Six year drop off Could I then start sending off SAR requests (browsing through the site it seems so but just incase) ?

Thanks so much for your help everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I might start with the Halifax one as it is the furthest away from dropping off. I really am not sure however when to count 6 years from, I am assuming it is the default date as written in the credit report, or is it the last time the account was updated as some of them were updated in 2009 which would be disgusting if that was the case!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's YOUR last financial in/out that starts the clock ticking.

 

NOTHING barring a CCJ can reset it, other than YOU writing a letter that says [specifically] 'i ack this debt' and you sign it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's YOUR last financial in/out that starts the clock ticking.

 

NOTHING barring a CCJ can reset it, other than YOU writing a letter that says [specifically] 'i ack this debt' and you sign it.

 

dx

 

Im very sorry I do not understand what your saying to me. There are 3 dates on that report.

 

Special Instruction Start Date

Defaulted on

File Updated for the period to

 

Is it one of these dates, or is it simply the last time anything was paid to / from the card ? If it is the latter then I do not know when that would have been. Would a SAR not tell me anyway?

 

Very sorry again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said YOUR last financial transaction ......

 

the SAR should tell you that hopefully

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said YOUR last financial transaction ......

 

the SAR should tell you that hopefully

 

dx

 

Ah ok so basiclly the very last amount of money to the account, be it negative or positive. So those dates on the credit file mean sweet FA then? God damn it, i thought they would be dropping off in 2011 aswell. Good job i checked.

 

I did reclaim the charges off the account, I must check through those documents. I cannot remember though if that was a SAR or something else.

 

Thanks very much for your help DX, got there in the end

Link to post
Share on other sites

*edit*

 

Never mind. I thought i should ask them for the original CCA first before a SAR but i read on here somewhere that they do not have to comply if the account is satisfied which my Halifax one is.

 

I'll just SAR them i think. I will draw up a letter tonight and hopefully someone can give me advice on how it looks.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is an standard SAR template

scrollup and hit the library tab at the top.

 

please be clear.........the clock starts from YOUR last use of the A/c

be it to buy anything or to pay the monthly amount.

nothing to do with whatever they may do on the A/C.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is an standard SAR template

scrollup and hit the library tab at the top.

 

please be clear.........the clock starts from YOUR last use of the A/c

be it to buy anything or to pay the monthly amount.

nothing to do with whatever they may do on the A/C.

 

dx

 

Thanks DX

 

The standard SAR template talks about intrest etc but I have already claimed that back, so I guess i will just edit out bits that don't apply so I wont look stupid.

 

I'll let you know how I get on, as If it is when I last used the account it might already be 6 years ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno what you are looking at??????

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-

 

is what you want.

 

++ you cant reclaim interest either.....

 

you are confusing me.......

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the defaults will drop off in 2011, regardless of the current status. the six years runs from termination of the account, so the date of settlement is irrelevant. you can settle the account 20 years after the default and the account should not reappear on your file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno what you are looking at??????

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-

 

is what you want.

 

++ you cant reclaim interest either.....

 

you are confusing me.......

 

dx

 

Yeah I was looking at the wrong thing indeed doh!

 

So its 12 days + 2 yeah?

 

Thanks ;)

Edited by MountainGoat
Link to post
Share on other sites

the defaults will drop off in 2011, regardless of the current status. the six years runs from termination of the account, so the date of settlement is irrelevant. you can settle the account 20 years after the default and the account should not reappear on your file.

 

I may just leave it alone and not awaken a sleeping giant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok So i just looked through my account details for Style, I had previously did a SAR on them when i was trying to claim back charges without success. The very last activity on the account from me was on the Feb 2006 When I paid around £500. There was then another credit on the account which said write off done in June 2006 which left the account balance at £0.00.

 

So am I right in saying that i should be counting from Feb 2006 based on the fact that was the last activity with the account from myself personally? The write off must have been done by themselves in June 2006.

 

That being the case, and being that i owe them nothing, what would the next step be in trying to remove a default or is it correct to say that it cannot be done when the balance is at 0?

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim the charges.

 

if the DN balance had charges inc, then the DN must be invalid

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

reclaim the charges.

 

if the DN balance had charges inc, then the DN must be invalid

 

dx

 

Hey DX

 

Yeah the balance had late payment fees and intrest applied to it at silly rates (£16 a month) when i went over the limit throughout the account duration. I did try and claim the fees a long time ago but i got a letter telling me that the OFT limited its investagation to credit cards only. I will scan it and post it up here tomorrow.

 

So this would qualify it as an invalid DN?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

OFT my FOOT!

 

load of old cobbrers and you fell for it!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

OFT my FOOT!

 

load of old cobbrers and you fell for it!

 

 

dx

 

Just wasnt sure if they were telling the truth or not.

 

The office of fair trading has restricted its investagation to credit cards and has not consulted with style financial services in relation to other products, including store cards. As the account is a store card the charges are valid and will remain.

 

I realise that my response may not provide you with the outcome you expect, however I trust my explanation clarifies our position.

 

4rxr89.jpg

 

Thats what I recieved (2007). So if I am correct, I need to ask them to remove the default based on the fact the late payment fees applied on the account were illegal & I need to ask for a true original copy of the signed agreement?

Edited by MountainGoat
Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

 

not illegal...unlawful.

 

they were applied as a penalty that was not a true representation of their actual costs.

 

if the DN figure had any kind of unlawful charges inc in it, then that invalidates it.

 

as said before....you cannot get a copy of agreement as the contract is over.

see what the SAR brings they might inc it esp if you asked in the SAR letter.

 

incidently...its 40 calander days for an SAR.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope

 

not illegal...unlawful.

 

they were applied as a penalty that was not a true representation of their actual costs.

 

if the DN figure had any kind of unlawful charges inc in it, then that invalidates it.

 

as said before....you cannot get a copy of agreement as the contract is over.

see what the SAR brings they might inc it esp if you asked in the SAR letter.

 

incidently...its 40 calander days for an SAR.

 

dx

 

Is there any point in doing the SAR if we know that the default is invalid? Perhaps a letter asking the default to be removed because of said charges being unawful would be better?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i just throw another spanner in the works here,.......

 

is there the possibility that you did not make the required payments on the style account for 6mts or so before the defaulted date?

if so, then the marker of 8, can be an automatic one by the cra system so thus style did not send a default notice.

 

any ideas on that? can you remember?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...