Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
    • Hi Dave, I had no updates on this PCN since my last post in July 2019.  I received no further communications from the parking company.  I changed my address in May 2022. Thanks, I will send a letter to Excel parking to inform about the change in the address. 
    • I have a BMW Advanced Car Eye 3 Pro - I think it's 50/50  In any case, none of the documents / photos sent in the SAR showed a ticket on the car. 
    • I've seen on your other thread that you say you moved in 2022. It is essential you tell the parking company about your new address. Every couple of months or so we get someone here who moves, doesn't tell the other party they're in dispute with, court papers turn up at the old address, the Cagger doesn't know anything about this and doesn't defend, they lose by default - and end up with a backdoor CCJ. So get a quick letter off to Excel - Dear Simple Simon, Re: PCN no.XXXXX will you please note that I no longer live at XXXXX and that my new address is XXXXX. Yours, XXXXX Invest in a 2nd class stamp and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yeah thanks guys - I'm just going to ignore them now.  Can't be ar$ed digging around in the loft!  Can I still send them a notice not to send people to our door?   I know we did 10 years ago but not sure if that's still a "thing"!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit demands more money then i can afford


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

Send the DCA the following harassment letter and also make a very strong complaint to OFT and also Trading Standards via consumer Direct as these clowns are already under an OFT warning. Investigate Call Barring to stop them phoning or even change numbers. I will find a SAR letterfor you but this is the telephone one:

 

Harassment by telephone

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT UNDER THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006 COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE

 

Reference NUMBER:

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Please treat this also as a formal complaint, and send me a copy of your company complaints procedure.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR letter with £10 postal order, recorded delivery and don't sign

 

[DATE]

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal datalink3.giflink3.gif which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

The Subject Access is not limited to my transaction history and it is not limited merely to 6 yearslink3.giflink3.gif of historical information.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[signature]

 

[name]

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, a SAR to a debt collector will serve little purpose as they tend to have very little by way of information, send the SAR to the Original Creditor and a simple "prove it" letter to 1st credit.

 

If they cannot prove that they are the current owners of the debt, or are acting for the current owners, then what exactly are they doing making demands?

 

This doesn't require any deep legal phrasing, it is simpy a case of.

 

"I don't believe that I owe you anything, can you please prove that I do. "

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou all for taking the time to reply and helping me with the templates, i will get onto it tommorrow, 1st credit sent me their standing order details, but a prove it letter will be on it's way, so we shall see. and Coledog, your right i should make a complaint to the OFT, because the more people complain, the greater chance of these muppets having their license revoked. I've done nothing but reserach this company and i have heard personal accounts of what they have put people through, it's disgusting. I will NOT let these people bully me.

 

I'll keep you posted and thanks again for your replies, if it wasn't for all your reassurance and advice, i would have had many sleepless nights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st credit is the company MOST in the OFT radar - in danger of losing their licence if they continue to be naughty. Google them to find out more about this. I remember them being looked at in BBC Watchdog by Nicky Campbell a couple of years ago and a Government Minister saying they were the one most in the spotlight.

 

Bottom line? They won't DARE go too far - so YOU are in control - pay what you can afford - NO MORE. If you get unexpected vital bills from elsewhere then just PAY LESS - but tell them why. I would try to pay by BACS or online banking so you can alter the amount and avoid getting into other unauthorised overdraft probelms if you can't make the SO payment any month.

 

I used to pay most creditors £75 per month each - but I have cut it down if any other bills came in - now I only pay them £5 per month and have never increased it again - They all moan from time to time but continue to take the £5 and never take it any further, even no empty threats any nmore.

 

I have also never supplied any I&E to them - just tell them that is what I worked out with CCCS who did get my I&E. They have to accept that - no option. I am in control (at last!)

 

Good luck!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, i answerd the phone to ist credit, i didn't know it was them and i asked them to put everything in writing, but they were very persistant and i am ashamed to say they drew me into an argument, the women on the phone was so rude, she said if i don't provide them with an I and E within 7 days then she will cancel the agreement and take further action, i so regret being wound up by them and being drawn into the argument. I thraetened to report them to OFT and she said that she has recordings of me being rude to her agents (i wasn't rude, i was standing up for myself). I told her that they were bullying me and harrassing me and it's causeng me to feel ill, i told her i will not pay more than £50 and i am not willing to provide my employees details or my private finances. I know what your all thinking 'you shouldn't have spoken to them on the phone', well i WILL NOT be doing that again as i am seriously considering changing my number. She just wound me up. I haven't had access to a computer, so i didn't get the template of the harrassement letter until now (thanks for sending it), i will be writing that out and sending it of to them. I told her i will continue paying £50, whether they want to accept it or not, i'm not refusing to pay, she also refused to send me a doa, as she reckons Connault sent me one in 2006, so again another letter for that will go out. Stress, stress, stress and my stupidity by talking to those clowns caused it. Why wont they just let me get on with paying them????

Link to post
Share on other sites

weston

 

I would pay the £50 for a couple of months whilst awaiting rersults of SAR. If you don't get the stuff from LTSB (and a copy of the proper NOA on LTSB paper) STOP PAYING. They'll need all the documentation for any court case - so IF they find it, and threaten court again, then you just START PAYING again. I AM CONVINCED they would NEVER take anyone to court who was regularly paying what they could prove was affordable.

 

Good luck

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weston, I don't have anything to add to this discussion other than simply to echo wha t others have said. Treat these bottom feeders as the **** they are (how's that for a mixed metaphor?!). If you do speak to them, make it plain to them that you know your rights. I used simply to say "I'm sorry but you're not entitled to that information, I know my rights, I WILL be paying you £xx per month by BACS". They can say what they want, demand as much as they like, and threaten all they want but just stay calm - if you really want to wind them up when they threaten you, there's one sure fire way of doing it...

 

...laugh.

 

Try it, you'll feel so much better :-)

 

(run a search on the forum for the "cheekiness" thread -that should provide some relief)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel so much better now, i have now taken on all your advice (thanks again) and acted on it, by the way Stunned Monkey, loved the cheekiness thread, i have to admit, i was trying to wind the guy up on the phone yesterday, to a point where he had to get an agent of a 'higher level' onto the phone lol. Now i am going to sit, wait and chill. They will have recieved my 3 page long harrassment letter tommorrow, they now know where i stand and that i will not budge, and i may recieve proof of debt from them, i may not, but i am really not going to let them get to me anymore. Thanks again peeps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh my god, why don't they just leave me alone!!!! I had a letter from 1st credit with regards to my complaint, and no surprise there, they have basically disagreed with everything i have said. They said that i have 14 days to give them my financial statement, wage slips and employers details and if they don't recieve it then they will cancel my repayment of £50 and seek full recovery. What should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a deep breath, then re-read this thread from the start. How much of the advice hav eyou followed as yet? ;-)

 

They are NOT entitled to any personal information, only a judge can demand that, and no judge will listen to a case chasing a debt you're already servicing at a rate that's perfectyl reasonable.

 

In a nutshell, I'd suggest doing nothing - or if you feel you have to say something, write to them and tell them that you know your rights and you'll be paying them £50 whether they "agree" to it or not. As I understand it, they would actually have to refund you your payments in order to take you to court because in keeping them, they're accepting your terms (don't take this as gospel though!).

 

If you haven't already, CANCEL ANY DIRECT DEBITS. Make your repayments by standing order, or even better proactively via online banking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know, sorry i panicked, i took the advice on all the posts and your right, i shall do nothing. I've already cancelled direct debits so i payed my last payment through standing order. I shall keep making these payments and i shall send them a letter informing them that i will continue paying them regardless of whether they agree or disagree. Thank you and sorry again for panicking, they just stress me out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weston

 

Report them NOW. Remember what I said earlier about them being most in the spotlight - and in danger of losing their licence! They will NOT take you to court. In fact, in retrospect, £50 is FAR TOO GENEROUS when they haven't sent you the info to prove the debt. As I said earlier, if you don't get this then STOP PAYING ANYTHING after a couple of months. Send an ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE letter and just sit back and wait - don't talk to them on the phone. If you refuse to answer their security questions they CAN'T continue to talk to you - as they don't know who you are and would be breaking the DPA.

 

ABOVE ALL - DON'T PANIC

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember they do not know how to turn the 'off' switch once their threatomatic machine is started.

 

It should be ILLEGAL for them to continue to harrass when payments are being made. NOBODY'S circumstances change every 3 months so they are being extremely unreasonable expecting continual increases.

 

Debt buying and selling should be strictly limited - but sadly the government seems to welcome this murky industry with open arms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...