Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit demands more money then i can afford


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4985 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

Send the DCA the following harassment letter and also make a very strong complaint to OFT and also Trading Standards via consumer Direct as these clowns are already under an OFT warning. Investigate Call Barring to stop them phoning or even change numbers. I will find a SAR letterfor you but this is the telephone one:

 

Harassment by telephone

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT UNDER THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006 COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE

 

Reference NUMBER:

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Please treat this also as a formal complaint, and send me a copy of your company complaints procedure.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR letter with £10 postal order, recorded delivery and don't sign

 

[DATE]

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal datalink3.giflink3.gif which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

The Subject Access is not limited to my transaction history and it is not limited merely to 6 yearslink3.giflink3.gif of historical information.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[signature]

 

[name]

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, a SAR to a debt collector will serve little purpose as they tend to have very little by way of information, send the SAR to the Original Creditor and a simple "prove it" letter to 1st credit.

 

If they cannot prove that they are the current owners of the debt, or are acting for the current owners, then what exactly are they doing making demands?

 

This doesn't require any deep legal phrasing, it is simpy a case of.

 

"I don't believe that I owe you anything, can you please prove that I do. "

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankyou all for taking the time to reply and helping me with the templates, i will get onto it tommorrow, 1st credit sent me their standing order details, but a prove it letter will be on it's way, so we shall see. and Coledog, your right i should make a complaint to the OFT, because the more people complain, the greater chance of these muppets having their license revoked. I've done nothing but reserach this company and i have heard personal accounts of what they have put people through, it's disgusting. I will NOT let these people bully me.

 

I'll keep you posted and thanks again for your replies, if it wasn't for all your reassurance and advice, i would have had many sleepless nights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st credit is the company MOST in the OFT radar - in danger of losing their licence if they continue to be naughty. Google them to find out more about this. I remember them being looked at in BBC Watchdog by Nicky Campbell a couple of years ago and a Government Minister saying they were the one most in the spotlight.

 

Bottom line? They won't DARE go too far - so YOU are in control - pay what you can afford - NO MORE. If you get unexpected vital bills from elsewhere then just PAY LESS - but tell them why. I would try to pay by BACS or online banking so you can alter the amount and avoid getting into other unauthorised overdraft probelms if you can't make the SO payment any month.

 

I used to pay most creditors £75 per month each - but I have cut it down if any other bills came in - now I only pay them £5 per month and have never increased it again - They all moan from time to time but continue to take the £5 and never take it any further, even no empty threats any nmore.

 

I have also never supplied any I&E to them - just tell them that is what I worked out with CCCS who did get my I&E. They have to accept that - no option. I am in control (at last!)

 

Good luck!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG, i answerd the phone to ist credit, i didn't know it was them and i asked them to put everything in writing, but they were very persistant and i am ashamed to say they drew me into an argument, the women on the phone was so rude, she said if i don't provide them with an I and E within 7 days then she will cancel the agreement and take further action, i so regret being wound up by them and being drawn into the argument. I thraetened to report them to OFT and she said that she has recordings of me being rude to her agents (i wasn't rude, i was standing up for myself). I told her that they were bullying me and harrassing me and it's causeng me to feel ill, i told her i will not pay more than £50 and i am not willing to provide my employees details or my private finances. I know what your all thinking 'you shouldn't have spoken to them on the phone', well i WILL NOT be doing that again as i am seriously considering changing my number. She just wound me up. I haven't had access to a computer, so i didn't get the template of the harrassement letter until now (thanks for sending it), i will be writing that out and sending it of to them. I told her i will continue paying £50, whether they want to accept it or not, i'm not refusing to pay, she also refused to send me a doa, as she reckons Connault sent me one in 2006, so again another letter for that will go out. Stress, stress, stress and my stupidity by talking to those clowns caused it. Why wont they just let me get on with paying them????

Link to post
Share on other sites

weston

 

I would pay the £50 for a couple of months whilst awaiting rersults of SAR. If you don't get the stuff from LTSB (and a copy of the proper NOA on LTSB paper) STOP PAYING. They'll need all the documentation for any court case - so IF they find it, and threaten court again, then you just START PAYING again. I AM CONVINCED they would NEVER take anyone to court who was regularly paying what they could prove was affordable.

 

Good luck

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weston, I don't have anything to add to this discussion other than simply to echo wha t others have said. Treat these bottom feeders as the **** they are (how's that for a mixed metaphor?!). If you do speak to them, make it plain to them that you know your rights. I used simply to say "I'm sorry but you're not entitled to that information, I know my rights, I WILL be paying you £xx per month by BACS". They can say what they want, demand as much as they like, and threaten all they want but just stay calm - if you really want to wind them up when they threaten you, there's one sure fire way of doing it...

 

...laugh.

 

Try it, you'll feel so much better :-)

 

(run a search on the forum for the "cheekiness" thread -that should provide some relief)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel so much better now, i have now taken on all your advice (thanks again) and acted on it, by the way Stunned Monkey, loved the cheekiness thread, i have to admit, i was trying to wind the guy up on the phone yesterday, to a point where he had to get an agent of a 'higher level' onto the phone lol. Now i am going to sit, wait and chill. They will have recieved my 3 page long harrassment letter tommorrow, they now know where i stand and that i will not budge, and i may recieve proof of debt from them, i may not, but i am really not going to let them get to me anymore. Thanks again peeps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh my god, why don't they just leave me alone!!!! I had a letter from 1st credit with regards to my complaint, and no surprise there, they have basically disagreed with everything i have said. They said that i have 14 days to give them my financial statement, wage slips and employers details and if they don't recieve it then they will cancel my repayment of £50 and seek full recovery. What should i do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a deep breath, then re-read this thread from the start. How much of the advice hav eyou followed as yet? ;-)

 

They are NOT entitled to any personal information, only a judge can demand that, and no judge will listen to a case chasing a debt you're already servicing at a rate that's perfectyl reasonable.

 

In a nutshell, I'd suggest doing nothing - or if you feel you have to say something, write to them and tell them that you know your rights and you'll be paying them £50 whether they "agree" to it or not. As I understand it, they would actually have to refund you your payments in order to take you to court because in keeping them, they're accepting your terms (don't take this as gospel though!).

 

If you haven't already, CANCEL ANY DIRECT DEBITS. Make your repayments by standing order, or even better proactively via online banking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know, sorry i panicked, i took the advice on all the posts and your right, i shall do nothing. I've already cancelled direct debits so i payed my last payment through standing order. I shall keep making these payments and i shall send them a letter informing them that i will continue paying them regardless of whether they agree or disagree. Thank you and sorry again for panicking, they just stress me out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weston

 

Report them NOW. Remember what I said earlier about them being most in the spotlight - and in danger of losing their licence! They will NOT take you to court. In fact, in retrospect, £50 is FAR TOO GENEROUS when they haven't sent you the info to prove the debt. As I said earlier, if you don't get this then STOP PAYING ANYTHING after a couple of months. Send an ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE letter and just sit back and wait - don't talk to them on the phone. If you refuse to answer their security questions they CAN'T continue to talk to you - as they don't know who you are and would be breaking the DPA.

 

ABOVE ALL - DON'T PANIC

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember they do not know how to turn the 'off' switch once their threatomatic machine is started.

 

It should be ILLEGAL for them to continue to harrass when payments are being made. NOBODY'S circumstances change every 3 months so they are being extremely unreasonable expecting continual increases.

 

Debt buying and selling should be strictly limited - but sadly the government seems to welcome this murky industry with open arms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...