Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scammed on an online purchase


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey all, I stumbled upon these forums after looking up ways to chargeback a certain fraudulent e-commerce transaction. From lurking around, I learned that I can charge back Visa Debit transactions, and want to do so but I have a few questions regarding my situation.

 

What happened was I bought a monitor from an eCrater online retailer. eCrater is kind of like eBay in the fact that they allow sellers to make their own little domains where they can sell things to the general public. The monitor was explicitly advertised as brand new. I was sent a totally different monitor altogether, which, although it is the same size and brand, didn't have the same options as the monitor I specifically ordered. To add insult to injury it was refurbished.

 

I initially assumed that it was a mistake and emailed the guy saying that he messed up. He offered to send me the correct one if I pay for the shipping back to him. Of course, this is ridiculous, as it wasn't my responsibility to ensure that I received the correct package. So I opened a paypal dispute. (NOT a claim, just a way to track our emails) I learn soon after that PayPal doesn't cover anything that's not on eBay, but the nice lady on the phone directed me to charge back my visa debit card via my Bank.

 

This means that I can't even get a guarantee that I will receive my money back after I send him back his monitor. My question is:

 

Taking into account all factors, would I have a likely chance of winning the chargeback dispute? How can I maximize my chances?

 

Thanks all, this is a great forum! Keep it up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You tell your bank that issued the debit card that yu have been conned and that you want a chargeback. Sometimes (and with some banks) they can't be bothered so will say it can't be done, if that should happen ask to see someone higher.

Print out the sale advert from site before it disappears in case you need it later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tell the clerk that you want to make a chargeback please. They can't refuse as it is not their scheme but Visa, what they can do it say it's not possible because they can't be bothered.

 

There are safety rules built in so it won't happen there and then. It is investigated before the chargeback is allowed and it can be refused legitimately.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep,

Go to the bank that provided your debit card. Explain. Normaly they should make a phone call to the company you payed with (f.e. VISA) and those will send you a letter. They advice that you try to settle your dispute with the seller.If not possible they ask for proof (letters,e-mail) that you made the efford to settle.And then they open 'a case'.

greetzzz

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just contacted my Bank (Bank of America) and they told me I had to ship the monitor back before they can open a claim. If I do that then there's no way for me to guarantee my money back whatsoever. Should I call again and ask to speak to a different representative?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yo,

In my opinion,and I am not a lawyer or professional, there is no use in speaking with another representative.

I would try to come to terms with the seller.Try to persuade him that you have no fault in this.If not count what sending back will cost you.In the end you have the item you want , just a little bit more expensive than you thought.BUT you will have want you want.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just contacted my Bank (Bank of America) and they told me I had to ship the monitor back before they can open a claim. If I do that then there's no way for me to guarantee my money back whatsoever. Should I call again and ask to speak to a different representative?

 

To the contrary, so long as you formally cancel a distance contract, the right to be refunded under the Distance Selling Regulations is unconditional and absolute, never mind whatever conditions the seller or a bank or anybody else would rather expect to impose.

 

If you cancel, there is not so much as a duty to return the goods to a seller, only to make them available to a seller to collect, which is not say that in this particular case you should, because the goods to be delivered did not arrive.

 

I would simply have told the bank that there is nothing to return!

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...