Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Loan application declined for no apparent reason


hollysmum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello! This week, I applied for a personal loan from Natwest to consolidate a few debts, and make my monthly outgoings a bit less, and therefore a bit more manageable. Yesterday, my application was declined, and I was told it was because "certain things" had cropped up on my credit search, and that there had been a represented direct debit. This last matter occurred three weeks ago, and was found to be the bank's fault, and they acknowledged this and refunded me the admin charge that the recipient of the DD had levied on me. I was then very worried about what my credit check might be showing, as I could think of absolutely nothing. I was advised to run my own check on Equifax, which is who Natwest use to do credit checks. I did so, and I was right - there is absolutely nothing on there, and certainly nothing which should mean my loan application was declined. I have read that sometimes, if the bank doesn't think you'll make it any money, it will reject you for that reason alone. I have my mortgage with Natwest, I've taken out loans in the past with no problem, and recently bought some furniture on finance, which clearly wasn't rejected, so I am mystified. The report had not been seen by the adviser at my branch, and my partner has delivered it to him this morning so he can inspect it. He said that if all was well (and I can't for the life of me see why it shouldn't be, in light of my investigations), then he'd submit the application again. I made this application after a great deal of thought, not just on a whim, and I'm now bothered that it would be declined again, there having been a couple of recent searches on my credit record (apparently that can cause your application to be declined, too!!). Can anyone reassure/advise me, in case I go into a permanent decline??!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bizarre, isn't it, Cirian75, when they're all making immense profits yet again. No doubt on the back of my overdraft!! I'm still waiting to hear what has come of Customer Adviser Man having a look at my credit report.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it no bank is under an obligation to lend money by way of a personal loan. Credit scoring is part of the process but isn't a guarantee of success. You mention an overdraft? Was this to be repaid by the loan? You recently borrowed to buy furniture - is this to be be included in the new loan? It wouldn't necessarily be prudent of the bank to lend further amounts. When a bank says a loan has been declined because of 'certain things' it's usually because the branch adviser doesn't want a scene and doesn't want to say 'sorry the bank doesn't want to lend you the money'. This can be for any number of reasons but usually because they don't want to pick up other institutions loans on an unsecured basis. Despite what people hear about Banks being told to lend more money they are also very wary of future 'bad lending' not that I'm suggesting this is the case as regards to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, Silverbreak, thank you for your reply. I appreciate they don't have to lend anything to me if they ultimately don't want to, but really, when they come back to you, having declined your application for "certain things" and don't tell you what those are, it is really worrying. I was imagining all sorts of terrible things that even I didn't know about cropping up on the credit report. Yes, I have an overdraft, but I've had one for years, and it's not even a very large one. I have my mortgage with them, again, not a very large one (which is quite nice, these days!), and my furniture was not purchased using a loan from the bank, and I paid a large deposit for it, leaving, yet again, a relatively small amount outstanding. I want to update my kitchen and bathroom, as well as pay off these minor debts, so I would see this loan as being an investment, as it would enhance the value of my property, and therefore their interest in it (my mortgage). I applied for a Home Improvement loan from my local council to try and get these works done, but was told I earn £400 a year too much!!! The council actually condemned my bathroom (eek!), so you'll see that I'm becoming just a little bit desperate now! My house is up for sale, in any case, but people take one look at my poor bath, swiftly followed by my not-so-fitted kitchen, and run a mile. I have no savings to fund the necessary work, since I divorced, all I am asking for is a little monetary assistance, and really, the bank can't lose in this case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

I am having real hassle at the moment with an application for a bank loan.

I've never, ever had any problems before with getting one of these, or credit of any kind, and the response from my bank suggests that something has happened since December 09, when I easily obtained credit to buy some furniture.

 

All the adviser at my bank can tell me is that a "default" is showing up.

Now, I know that these checks are carried out on an address,

and my sister has suggested to me that what is showing up is my partner's recent arrangement with his car finance company to reduce his payments for a short period of time.

 

This arrangement was made quite properly,

it is clearly on his record with the company,

yet it is the only thing I can think of that might be popping up.

 

I have certainly not defaulted on anything,

and technically,

neither has he,

as it was agreed with the finance company.

 

He did this because his work can fluctuate,

and he'd had a rather lean month in March this year.

 

Rather than completely miss payments,

he quite rightly contacted the company to make this arrangement,

and they were very helpful.

 

This is the first time in nearly four years that he has had to do anything like this

- he's never, ever missed a payment.

 

We have received a stack of "stock" letters from the finance company,

endlessly telling him that his account is in arrears by however much, blah blah,

 

but then we get another letter confirming his arrangement to pay half for however many months!

 

Getting this bank loan would seriously help us out in more ways than one,

and I want to get this sorted.

 

I'm waiting on two further credit checks,

having done one with Equifax (used by my bank),

on which zilch showed up.

 

I am also incensed that no one has the decency to tell me exactly what is causing this problem (the car finance is only a guess),

 

when they know what it is,

and I have to waste time and effort finding out for myself.

 

Would my partner's reduced payment arrangement be a likely cause of this sudden crash in my previously-good credit rating?

 

If so, how can I tackle this

, and reinstate my rating?

 

Why would a properly-arranged agreement to pay less for a specified period of time cause such a huge problem?

 

Sorry to ramble on, but it's seriously worrying me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are linked financially to your partner i.e. via bank accounr or other laon etc then anything on your partners file will mirror onto yours. Unfortunaltely a payment arrangement can be places on your file normally for 6 month at a time and this is just as bad/equal to a default which will effect your credit score as this shows that you are having financial difficulties with your current situation which means most companies will not entertain in providing a loan to some already under strain.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...