Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The "grief tech" firms helping users create talking avatars of their dead relatives.View the full article
    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DPA Request - Address for Barclays


Azazal23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5907 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please see contact details in this section.

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

With regards to the manual intervention issue, if you know there has been manual intervention on your account, could the fact they failed to provide you with it class as failuire under the DPA disclosure? Just asking as ive just rec my DPA info after 41 days but no manual intervention info and i kniow its there

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

CCA Barclays and they have sent me a copy of the termination noice, at the top it has no date. The end has 16 Sep 04 and no signature.

 

Now i have check my credit report and its says they defaulted me on... yes 16 9 04

 

In effect they have given me no time to settle the account, the letter clearly says 14 days.

 

a. Do i have a shot at getting this removed, a its not a signed copy of the notice.

 

b. They cleary gave me no time to settle the account, registered the defult before they had even sent the notice (which i didnt receive)

 

They have sold the debt, but say they do not have to produce a deed of assignment as property was not held as security against the debt

 

Can anyone advise please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Azazal, perhaps one reason for the lack of response is that we are unclear of the meaning of your first few words.

Do you mean that you sent barclays a CCA request, and all they sent was a copy of their termination notice?

I wouldn't have thought that you could rely on that copy as being proof that

it was the day of termination since it is devoid of signatures and you would

expect that there would have been an accompanying letter.

 

If you want to obtain the actual copy of the default and termination notice

and the deed of assignement, your best bet would be to send them an SAR

and see what is included.

 

What are you hoping to achieve from Barclays?

Link to post
Share on other sites

very sorry for the misunderstanding. Yes basically they sent me the termination notice. But no mention of default on it. Also the termination notice was dated the same day as the Default was registered. It was also unsigned.

 

Well i owed then about 3k, around £700 was made up of bank charges whoch i was disputing. The debt has since been sold onto a DCA and i have sent them a CCA request have not acknowledeged the debt but am happy to pay what i owe.

 

The facts now seem to be.

 

A. They have sent me a termination Notice unsigned and dated 16/9/04 -

B, My credit record says this is the date i was defaulted it also says this is the date the debt was satisfied (i.e sold to the DCA)

C, They stated with regards to the Deed of assignment "is not applicable as your property was not held as security against this debt"

 

I definately did not receivce any default notice, so i need to know if a termination notice will suffice.

 

Also given that the Default was entered before i would of even received the notice (even if i did) how can i go about getting the defult removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Azazal, I go back to my original point that until you get the actual copies of the default notice and the termination, since you will then see the actual day of issue for each notice, it is impossible to say when they were issued.

The Act requires that there should be a minimum of seven days notice.

Should that not have happened here, I do not know what the result of that

could be. I doubt that it would void the debt, but it might mean that the

transfer of the debt should be reversed. Don't know if that would make a

difference.

You will be very hard pressed nevertheless to get the default removed as

long as there is a debt outstanding. And even if you did get it removed, they

could go straight back and apply for another one, and the six years would start all over again.

 

If you are going to contest the default, it would be better to clear the debt first, then query the timing of the default and termination notice.

 

Was the termination notice all you received when you sent the CCA request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i only recived that along with a cover letter telling me why they would not/could not supply the Deed Of Assignment.

 

The debt has been sold on which is fine, and my credit record reflects this the default is not showing settled. I am negotiating with the DCA to come to a settlement figure.

 

Now i thought the CCA request, would have made them supply the Default Notice which is what i asked for. What happens if they cant supply the default notice?

 

Do I ahve to SAR them now, as they ahve failed to provide the Default Notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Azazal23

 

I hope you don't think is is Hijacking, but it has some relevence to your post.

 

This may well need some clarification but IMO a termination notice and default notice have very different meanings under the Act. Terminiation notices are to do with HP type agreements and are issued to recover goods etc. We all know what a default notice is for.

 

Terminating an agreement will do just that - I would think any money owed will just disappear into the big fiscal void. The lifetime of an agreement can continue beyond default, but not termination.

 

The fact that many people use these terms interchangeably doesn't necessarily make it true.

 

Anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree too. I can accept that i owe money, but not to them to the DCA. They sent me a notice to terminate my account, not notice to file a Default. which they had already done by the time they had posted the letter.

 

Now if i may here is the jist so far.

 

Default was registered on my account on 16/9/04 - No Default notice was sent

 

According to my credit record the debt was settled on the 16/9/04.

 

According to the termination notice, i had 14 to payup. How could they have registered a default if the account was paid within the specified time. even if they had sent the notice which they did not

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the Consumer Credit Act states

 

DEFAULT AND TERMINATION

Default Notices

87.—(1) Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a "

default notice ") is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by

reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a) to terminate the agreement,

 

The default notice must be sent out first giving a minimum notice of seven days to the debtor or hirer of the intended action.

When they say termination, what they mean is that they will be assigning the debt to another company, so while the agreement will be terminated in

their accounts, the debt will still be owing and due to the new owner-who

acquires all the rights and duties of the original creditor.

 

In actuality, you should not have received the termination notice when you

asked for the CCA request. Bear in mind that as you have not seen the deed of assignment, you do not know when the debt was transferred. It may well

be just a clerical error that the default and termination date are the same.

They may have entered the termination date as the date of the letter rather

than the actual termination date .

I don't think you can say with certainty that they didn't send you the default

notice, all you can safely say is that you didn't receive it, which is not quite the same thing.

 

I did ask last time what else you received from your CCA request. Did you

get a copy of the original agreement and if so, was it delivered within the

correct time scale?

 

If you send Barclays the sar, you should get the deed of assignment and the

default notice along with details of all the charges they applied on your account so that you can reclaim the unlawful charges, making for a lower

debt figure with the DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received nothing else apart from a covering letter stated they were not sending the Deed of Assignment for the reason i have previously stated.

 

When you say "did i get a copy of the original agreement" do you mean the original bank/credit agreement i signed when opening the account if so no i did not recieve that either.

 

The charges thing i will tackle seperatley, that will be pretty easy to sort out. Its the default i want to focus on. Since i never recieved the Default notice, if they fail to provide it after the SAR i think i will have a pretty strong case for it to be removed.

 

As you stated it was supposed to be sent before the termination notice. and there are discrepencies with regards to the dates

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right in addition they have also stated they ahve not sent a copy of the "alleged agreement" as i put it becuase it only relates to Credit regulated products i.e loans etc... My debt was in relation to a current account so this does not appy

 

But they did enclose copy printout of my closing balance

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK will do that tonight. Many thanks and i will keep you al updated.

 

On a better note have had a letter from Welcome Finance confirming they will be removing a default they registered against me becuase they failed to adhear to the CCA request, could not provide the information. So it does show stick in there and you can get a result

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right in addition they have also stated they ahve not sent a copy of the "alleged agreement" as i put it becuase it only relates to Credit regulated products i.e loans etc... My debt was in relation to a current account so this does not appy

 

But they did enclose copy printout of my closing balance

 

Doh! so that's why they sent you a termination notice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have type up the SAR, but Barlcays have been pretty ok so far with regards to gettig a response. I might just be polite and say thanks for the Termination Notice but i actually wanted the Defualt Notice can you send it on please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barlcays have just called saying they will be happy to post a copy of the Default notice out but it wont have a signature on as they just are automatically generated on a "proforma"

 

I Will obviously check the date on it when it arrives, they said they will request a copy of the oringinal agreement i signed when opening the account but this make take several weeks.

 

Now the DCA who the debt was sold to had until the middle of Feb to respond to their CCA request and have failed misrably

 

Obviously my main concern is the removal of the default. I will post again when i get the default notice.

 

Can anyone tell me what must be on it as in (the date sent or issued) does it require a signature etc.,..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me what must be on it as in (the date sent or issued) does it require a signature etc.,..

There is no direct requirement for a signature to be included, the only requirements are that a notice should be compliant with S.88 of the CCA, namely;

 

88.—(1) The default notice must be in the prescribed form and specify—

 

(a) the nature of the alleged breach;

(b) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it

and the date before which that action is to be taken;

© if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be

paid as compensation for the breach, and the date before which it is to be paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup my point precisly, they may send hundreeds out a day which is standard practice, but its very serious for the people who receive them. So when we do we deserve to have it properly executed and within the set timescale and guidelines if its not then i would say it has been wrongly issued and should be removed

Link to post
Share on other sites

My argument with this practice of shelling out proforma notices is that there

is no proof that an actual default notice was ever sent. And a default notice

is a vital part of CCA legislation, which deserves to be properly delivered.

Unfortunately the data controller / creditor in question would substantiate this process by submitting a witness statement to the court stating that the process is in place and they have no reasonable cause to believe that a notice was not issued.

 

A little harsh, but unless the courts had serious cause to disbelieve this, or evidence to the contrary, then they would be liable to rule in the data controllers favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My argument with this practice of shelling out proforma notices is that there is no proof that an actual default notice was ever sent. And a default notice is a vital part of CCA legislation, which deserves to be properly delivered.

 

I am just as concerned as you by this practice LFI. I can't back this up chapter and verse but someone at TS told me yesterday that "to send" in the act meant to send by standard post.

 

I am in the middle of a nasty little dispute with a ccp at the moment who say that they "sent" a copy of an agreement without ever having done so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is very ad-hoc so to speak you would think before duffing someone s credit up for the next 6 years they would be a little more precise. The cost of sending a leter recorded delivery is £1 at least they wouold have proof it was sent, just add the extra cost onto the customer like they do everything else

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5907 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...