Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nigel Farage savages France after D-Day paratroopers forced to show passports | Politics | News | Express.co.uk WWW.EXPRESS.CO.UK The soldiers landed in drop zones previously used by troops taking part in Operation Tonga, a vital mission to...  The irony was not lost on Mr Farage, who was in Normandy himself yesterday for a D-Day commemoration.   Nigel Farage savages France after D-Day paratroopers forced to show passports
    • So @theoldrouge where was farage during the D-day honors/remembrance ? He was quick to trash Sunak - but at least sunak showed his face heh?   Sunak perhaps needs to slip some dosh to led by donkeys to fund some banners in Clacton heh? Suggestions: D-day - Sunak maybe ran, but Farage never even showed Farage I'm the only one who can change my mind - dont you plebs think you can Clacton, who wants to spend time in Clacton? 48/52 is unfinished business - ooops eerrrr no it is  ...  err well unless its what I lose by Reject me 1 times shame on you, Reject me 7 times shame on me   Heres how: A statesman - and not just in waiting
    • Yep let us have a good laugh eh from today’s Telegraph 🤣😂🤣 the rest must try harder    Farage won Friday’s election debate, a poll finds Nigel Farage won Friday night’s seven-way BBC election debate, according to a poll.  A snap poll of 1,031 voters by More in Common found most thought Mr Farage won the debate, followed by Angela Rayner. Mr Farage received 25 per cent of the vote while Ms Rayner received 19 per cent. The Green Party’s Carla Denyer was the third most popular with 11 per cent, Stephen Flynn for SNP received 10 per cent and Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the House of Commons, took 7 per cent of the vote. Daisy Cooper, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru’s Rhun ap Iorwerth took 5 per cent and 2  per cent respectively. The debate saw Britain’s main seven political parties clash ahead of the general election on July 4.  Mr Farage, who returned to frontline politics for Reform this week and is standing as an MP in Clacton, challenged his political rivals on immigration and net zero policies.
    • Hi CAG Team, I'm seeking your skills and help for a NtK my partner received through the post earlier this week. To give a little backstory, my partner and I, along with our young children (4 and 7), decided to go on a camping holiday about 3 hours away from us. We took a car each because we didn't have enough room in one car. We arrived at the services at very similar times as we followed each other the whole way. So, two cars. My partner has received this NtK, but I haven't. This NtK dropped through the front door on Wednesday, June 5, 2024.  We both parked in the Burger King car park, not in BP; we got out, all went for a toilet break, got some food from the BP garage and returned to our cars to eat.  After eating, we took the kids to the toilet again before leaving to complete our journey. I didn't notice any parking restriction signs and can't get back to the location due to how far away it is. I noticed another person had an issue here and reported it to you, and they managed to get the charge dropped. See below. To me, it looks like they have cameras at the complex's entrance and exit. I'm not sure if they own the land/car park by Burger King, I'm not sure if this is a legal contract or not.  I find that 30 mins limit at a Services that serves hot food to be ridiculous and unfair, especially as we had kids to feed and water.  And the fact that I didn't receive the same NtK despite us driving in and out together is just crazy. This is the location - I also uploaded a map image. Google Maps MAPS.APP.GOO.GL ★★★☆☆ · Restaurant 1 Date of the infringement 24th May 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 29th May 2024 3 Date received 5th June 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y - Only entering and exiting the complex/land. 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N 7 Who is the parking company? MET 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] BP Blue Boys, Tonbridge TN12 7HE For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA I hope you can help me out with some guidance on how to proceed with this. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Passerby0233 2024-06-08 13_17_52-Burger King - Google Maps — Mozilla Firefox.pdf NtK_29-05-2024.compressed.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

National mileage register query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am posting this on behalf of a member of another motoring forum.....

 

"I have had some probs with my Seat diesel, I have put it up for sale to buy a smart diesel instead and all I been getting in the past week is people coming agreeing a deal then they go do their hpi check and comes back with higher mileage reading from the register above.

 

Let me tell you, it has a full Seat history with all the mots and only 2 owners has 46k, now but checks are coming back 106k so its putting off all the customers, I can assure you this car has not had 106k and I bought it from seat themselves

 

I have googled this issue and it appears a few people have had trouble with the national mileage register but its not on, how do I get it off the register? They dont remove anything on there even if you fax all your evidence!

 

My question is this, WHERE DO THEY GET THAT INFO FROM??!!"

 

 

Thanks for any replies to this troubling problem!

 

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know my son received a letter from them after he sold his car last year asking him to inform them of the cars millage when he sold it. As it is voluntary he decided not to bother. They never asked for proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its just wrong where do they get it from? how can i out the miles on the register? cant sell the car when people think ive done 100k and im advertising it with 46k they even talking about police but i have done nothing wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

How strange, they claim my car is not registered with them.. I bought it briand new, it's sitting on my drive and they want 35 euros for a report. Oh Cartel ie is based in Ireland and is four years old...what a way to make money. Incorrect information on the first check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

How do we make the public aware of this. My car isn't even listed with them, which makes it even more disconcerting. The people who do use them believe their figures are correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do as you;re doing now. Raise the concerns in motoring forums. Why not also ask them how you can be assured the data you are paying for is accurate? They might bury themselves.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
I am posting this on behalf of a member of another motoring forum.....

 

"I have had some probs with my Seat diesel, I have put it up for sale to buy a smart diesel instead and all I been getting in the past week is people coming agreeing a deal then they go do their hpi check and comes back with higher mileage reading from the register above.

 

Let me tell you, it has a full Seat history with all the mots and only 2 owners has 46k, now but checks are coming back 106k so its putting off all the customers, I can assure you this car has not had 106k and I bought it from seat themselves

 

I have googled this issue and it appears a few people have had trouble with the national mileage register but its not on, how do I get it off the register? They dont remove anything on there even if you fax all your evidence!

 

My question is this, WHERE DO THEY GET THAT INFO FROM??!!"

 

 

Thanks for any replies to this troubling problem!

 

 

P

 

I have same issue i have a bmw 330i and have full bmw main dealer service history with all mot and receipts etc,last year on mot milage was 69,768 have mot and a recent service to that date confirming milage,had a hpi check yesterday from a buyer and it said 170,000 for that date it then said "revised"and 70,000 after it,they have updated the issue but the 170,000 remain on there for everyone to see even though it was an error,this put off my purchaser and i dont blame him i wouldnt buy a car i thought was clocked.It is good for the ads tougt when they say 1 IN 12 CARS ARE CLOCKED 2 IN 10 CARS HAVE ACCIDENT DAMAGE.purly because they make it up as they go along.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no mystery. Read the link.

 

As you can see, it is very easy for a typo or transposition to cause problems, but if you provide the correct proof, they'll amend their records.

i think it has been ammended already hence the word revised and milage reduce to 70,000 2 months later however it should be removed not just revised surly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, Just thought I'd drop in my tuppence worth. We run the Irish National Mileage Register and collect mileage data for similar purposes as HPI (our car history website is called Motorcheck.ie). Our data sources are similar but with one exception. We don't use mileage readings provided by private individuals purchasing a car history check. We felt this was an area that would be open to abuse (false readings being submitted against cars) and wanted to make the data as reliable as possible.

 

However, we take the view that the national mileage register should be there to facilitate and validate the sale of a legitimate reading as well as uncover any cases of clocking. We realise that mileage data aggregated on a large scale will always contain a small percentage of errors. Whether it's simply human error at the input stage or mistaking a mileage reading for kilometers it can be annoying when a car history check shows up a perfectly legitimate car as having a 'mileage discrepancy'.

 

Our policy is to remove any offending readings from the database once they can be proven to be false. If the incorrect reading has damaged a sales opportunity we're always happy to speak with a potential purchaser and explain where the incorrect reading came from and how we're rectified it on our database.

 

At Motorcheck we feel that a good car history check service should protect both buyers and sellers. That's why we're always happy to listen to any customer who has issues with the data we provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do have them and all been verified online from dvla so have stamps in book and car is mint buyer wouldnt have it or believe it,dont help sell the car though when these agencies say DONT BUY IF THERES A DESCREPENCY etc scares people off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And it remains a fair warning. However, as you can prove the real mileage by way of previous MoT certificates (which is VOSA, not DVLA) this is positive proof of an error. Vehicle service records less so...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...