Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak must be using GBNOTnews financial planners .. GB News losses up 38% to £42.4m giving channel total deficit of £76m since launch Losses in the latest accounting period were six times greater than revenue.   Mind you, as it seems to clearly be a disinformation service and route of money to poopy MPs and hangers on ... I'm sure they dont mind (mm is that the 'Tory guv or GBNews I'm talking about?.)   GB News owner pumps in further £41mn in funding as losses widen WWW.FT.COM Vehicle backed by hedge fund tycoon Paul Marshall steps in as right-leaning broadcaster increases number of staff   GB News losses grew 38% to £42.4m in 2023 financial year - Press Gazette PRESSGAZETTE.CO.UK GB News' operating losses grew 38% to £42.4m in the year to May 2023, the business has reported in its latest Companies House...  
    • United Kingdom Debt Clock: British National Debt Grow By The Second - Commodity.com COMMODITY.COM Want to know why the UK's national debt-to-GDP ratio is increasing so rapidly? See our overview of the UK national debt and GDP figures.   The tories borrowing last year alone was " £1,780 per head of the UK’s population"
    • Hi Schipoo and thank you for the update.   Excellent news for you and a huge relief, I imagine. You might like to start a new thread about Independent Tax if you want advice on that problem. HB
    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ofcom announce new codes of practice from JAN 2011


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps so, but the real story is rather than start immediately, there is a further 6 months before consumer can benefit. Secondly, this only affects fixed network providers (not mobile/wireless). This is unusual, as there are supposedly more mobile conenctions than fixed, so why concentrate on the least important? It would have made sense (in view of the timeframe) to offer complaints resolution across all providers, irrespective of technology.

 

Better than nothing, perhaps - but the reality is mobile users will still have at least another year (at best) before wireless joins the party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ofcom are requiring that the mobile industry introduce several changes in the way that they do things, changes which by and large the operators oppose. The fixed line industry has already implemented these measures previously as they have been ordered to do so by Ofcom as part of a seperate programme, so the fixed line operators have computer systems in place to meet the requirements the code places on them, also all of their staff have been trained in how to use these systems. The mobile operators have not had a chance to do any of this.

 

The operators have to have some lead time to implement these changes, if Ofcom announced that the changes were to take effect immediatley, the operators would scream bloody murder and quite rightly so.

 

As it is the mobile network operators are going to have to crash develop IT systems or make substantial amendments to their existing systems to cope with Ofcom's new rules, along with retraining all of their customer service staff in how to use these systems and what the new code means to their business.

Edited by Human Writes
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes agree.

The mobile markets tend to toe the line at the last minute.

If they have been given xxx date to comply,then there is no reason for them to comply earlier than they have to.

We saw the same with their lowering of European call and sms.

At least this is a push in the right direction.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You overlook the point being made - they've concentrated on the easiest part of the process, AND given it a massive lead time. There is nothing preventingf OFCOm putting the network operators on notice NOW for changes to be made in 2011, but there has been none. Not a dicky.

 

As for 'implementing changes' the bulk of these are simply enforced policy changes - what software is required to do that? Anything else can be implemented afer-the-event. There could also be a moratorium on full implementation if certain firmsa are unable to comply and could seek a delay if they could justify it. What you describe is what will happen, a last-minute enforcement, not because they cannot do it earlier but because there is no requirement for them to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"What you describe is what will happen, a last-minute enforcement, not because they cannot do it earlier but because there is no requirement for them to do so."

 

Yes I know-thats why I said it.

I am not privvy to knowing or understanding the inns and outs of the decisions behind OFCOMs announcement in allowing the mobile markets more time to comply.

 

If you know those answers then lets hear them ..........

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides the fact that they are a toothless quango? :lol:

 

 

Am I right in saying all this does is tell the telecoms companies to inform customers what rights they have for complaining, and give the complaints bit from the Code of practice on a bill rather than the customer requesting their complaints procedure? I don't see what major overhaul of systems this will add as by rights they should be trained to send out a copy of the "code of practice" if requested anyway. I wonder if the telecoms companies are going to charge more for a paper bill now with it needing the extra paper for the "relevant dispute resolution service" to be printed on :roll:

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mobile network operators need to be able to assess whether each of the millions of telephone calls and tens of thousands of letters/emails they receive each month are an either express or implied complaint.

They then need to track whether or not that complaint is resolved, if it is the subject of a repeat complaint which is also not resolved, so if any customer contacts an operator twice or more, after eight weeks if the complaint is not resolved they then need to write to customers to explain their rights regarding ADR.

The networks need to get MUCH better at tracking complaints along with their route causes, keeping a record of outcomes and assessing whether or not each unresolved repeat complaint is eligible for arbitration.

Ofcom reckons that 3 million complaints go unresolved, I think that's probably low, from memory Ofcom's requirements from this report run to 20 or 30 pages of A4 text requiring operators make changes to basically every aspect of their complaint handling process. I agree that the lead time is long, I didn't think the ADR stuff had a 12 month lead time I thought that it all had to be done within six months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...