Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is essentially a shared area where there is some private parking but there is also customer parking for a shop that is labelled as customer parking with a time limit of 30 mins.  A friend of mine also received a similar notice around the same time so I assume they are just trying it.  The photo evidence doesn't really show anything as it is pitch black and shows an entry and exit less than the 30 minutes allowed in the customer parking spaces.  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ?  WWW.MONEYCLAIM.GOV.UK / Civil National Business Centre If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS) Name of the Claimant :            Claimants Solicitors: BW Legal   Date of issue – 02/5/24   Date for AOS - 20/5/24 (submitted 16/5/24) Date to submit Defence - 3/6/24   What is the claim for – The Claim is for £170.00 due from the Defendant for an unpaid parking charge following a contractual breach which occurred on Sin the private car park/land at The Collective London Nw10 6Ff by the driver of registration mark, The private car park/land was lawfully occupied by the Claimant. The displayed terms and conditions offered the driver a contractual licence, were accepted upon entry by the driver, and subsequently breached. Driver's breach: Non-Permit Holder Despite demands, the parking charge remains unpaid. The Claim also includes £70.00 recovery costs as set out in the terms and conditions and in the ATA AoS Code of Practice. What is the value of the claim? 255.00 Amount Claimed 170.00 court fees 25.00 legal rep fees 50.00 Total Amount 255.00 Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? No Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? No   The Collective Parking Claim Form Redacted.pdf
    • From their website. https://www.hp.com/gb-en/shop/faq.aspx?p=terms-and-conditions#consumer-customers 12. Effects of cancellation / withdrawal If you cancel your purchase in the timeframes outlined in section 10 (Your right to change your mind after shipment) above you will receive a full refund including the costs of delivery (where applicable) within 14 days from the date of cancellation, except as set out below. We will provide the refund using the same means of payment as you used for the initial transaction, unless you have expressly agreed otherwise.   Was it a change of mind, or faulty return?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Strange on this JSA and In Time Finance LTD Ipswich


Greer8472
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5057 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Where shall I start.

 

I got some print outs from JSD beginning of last week. There was two. One for an employment agency where I some how need experience in hygiene which I have none what so ever but I would like to get into H&S but this has nothing to do with what I learnt just because I know what COSHH is I was asked to apply for it. lol... need I say more.

 

To get to the point of the matter I done some research on the Internet like you should when you job search and found that In Time Finance LTD Ipswich appeared on this forum. I learnt through this site that this company has another trade name Cash Genie and a lot of people have been having problems with them. Trading standards being involved maybe, horrible tactics and possibly fraud.

 

I will be reporting these issues to my job advisers but I am not hopeing the best. Stuck here to be honest.

 

These print outs come from the job advisor not from the machine.

 

What do the users, helpers & mods think about this?

 

Thanks for everyone for bringing this to my attention.

 

 

link regarding Cash Genie & In Time Finance http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payday-loans/216108-cash-genie-dca.html

Edited by Greer8472
Link to post
Share on other sites

As the job advisor has given them to you I'd also expect that they will be monitoring the applications to see if you actually do apply for them.

 

They are really cracking down on this atm so expect no mercy whatsoever if you fail to do anything in your JSAg or as directed by an advisor like applying for a job.

 

As we read regularly not being qualified for a job is not being accepted as a valid excuse for not applying. So I can therefore only imagine what a DM will think when you tell them that "I didn't apply for this job because I read on the internet that they may be bad people".

 

Whilst I commend your moral stance! Are you seriously willing to risk up to 26 weeks without benefits (due to being sanctioned) based on the unsubstantiated musing of anonymous people on an internet forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no depths too murky for JCP to descend.

Lap dancing clubs among job centre advertisers - Scotland on Sunday

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no depths too murky for JCP to descend.

Lap dancing clubs among job centre advertisers - Scotland on Sunday

 

had an advert out our JC a few months back asking for escorts. if its legal they advertise it. I was going to apply my self but dont have the looks for it. (see my avatar for idea of what I mean)

I was told life was supposed to be one long learning curve.

Mines more a series of hairpin bends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The number they used for the job application seemed to be a dud. Phoned it several times and it rang for a few times and it gave a dead tone.

 

The JSC advisor accepted this a let it be. If the JSC wish to

investigate this they can but I am not going to waste time when I have other applications to apply to. I can't say more then pleased that this is the case. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its legal they advertise it

 

Precisely, there is little choice in the matter, if its legal employment the Jobcentre can be taken to court and has been taken to court over such matters. Its worth pointing out however that jobseekers can decline to apply for any job in the sex industry (which can include less obvious roles such as a warehouse assistant for Ann Summers) without it affecting their benefit.

 

I do find a certain irony however in the press criticising a government body for advertising sex industry jobs when I've never seen a local paper that didn't do exactly the same and probably couldn't care less about what the jobs entailed as long as they got paid for the advert.

 

Its especially amusing when the Daily Express preaches about such matters given its owner's empire of porn channels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...