Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sky Plus Box Problems


Missykay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya everyone,

 

I got a Sky plus box last year oct since i got have had to call them out so many times to repair it luckily it is within the warranty so dont have to pay for the callouts but dreading how to resolve it once the warranty runs out and might have to cancel and only watch five channels :lol:. I have not been given a working box from the beginning so dont feel why i should have to pay for the callouts in future. In the last two weeks had two recycled boxes which is annoying as i have lost all my programmes and having to set the prog again really gettin annoyed. Has anyone had any probs with their boxes and have they managed to resolve the issue with Sky amicable ?

 

i am fed up with the stupid box it is worser then the old one i had. Also been told that my phone is too close to the tv which interferes with the signal thus i have alot of music channels not working esp Kiss channel which i luv so where else can i move the phone if the phone socket is there :mad:

 

any ideas how to resolve this ??? :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They tried charging me an £80 call out fee so I threatened to move to VIRGIN they came out a sorted it.

 

Have they checked the LNB on the dish this turned out to be the problem with mine.

 

If your phone needs moving to other side of room you can ether fit an extension to other side or just get an extension cable which you can pick up cheap enough from poundland or the 99p store.

 

Oh and do not fall for there trap of trying to sell you insurance as its not needed they will soon come out to you if you ask to be put though to cancellations

 

They will ask why you want to leave so just tell them why they will then offer to come out free of charge to sort out the problems.

 

They want your money

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply i live in a area where we dont have cable so are there any other alternatives who off sevices like Sky ? as i always assumed that because of no cables around here we were kinda stuck with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you looked at BT or considered FREESAT

 

With freesat there is no monthly charges you just pay for the equipment and thats it

Edited by pompeyfaith

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that a commercial link :rolleyes::)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

With freesat no dish is required as it uses the same sky dish so you just plug it in and away you go.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps sorry maroondevo ill take it down

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you looked at BT or considered FREESAT

 

With freesat there is no monthly charges you just pay for the equipment and thats it

 

with FREESAT how much wud it cost initially ?

 

with this service i wud prob have to get a warranty rite ?

 

how reliable is it ? do u knw ?

 

i am assuming BT wud be quite deer ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freesat you just but the box from an electrical store like you would a tv.

 

As for warranties no doubt they would try and sell you one but they are not compulsory it is personal choice if you don't want one don't buy one.

 

Also remember the SOGA covers you beyond the manufacturers guarantee

 

Just stick freesat in the search engine and research it :-)

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a little truth in WI-FI / Bluetooth / Dect Phones / Mobile Phones causing problem with other electronic devices inc PC's and TV's

 

but it is rare, but it can happen

 

some of the donts

 

dont place the wifi router on top of PC case , or next to a TV

 

dont leave the mobile phone close to a TV , or computer / computer speakers

 

Dect phones ( modern walk about phone ) as in the above

 

because all the device transmit RF they can affect other electronic devices

 

as for the phone causing problems to the TV signal , it will / can cause problem, E.G, very short burst of interferance , as the phone every 3 - 5 min's will log onto the local cell to identify its location

 

I wont bore everyone with the tech details of why it happens

 

cue DX100uk :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Edited by kiptower

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

no sorry

someone put chalk on me 'ed and its made me brain fuzzy.........

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ..My sky is insured for any breakages..im insured with Domestic and General...they work on behalf of sky and are a genuine company..It cost £8.08 a month so isnt expensive,,and that covers everything to do with sky ..contol boxs ,dish ,cables EVERYTHING ..:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

so thats ruffly the cost of your equipment over a year good value NOT

 

How long have you been paying this and have you call out an engineer yet?

 

May only be £8 a mth but have you worked out the total cost thus far against call outs id say you are paying over the odds PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

those people with Freesat have you had any probs wit them ? also have u had them for a long time ? or is it fairly new ?

 

I think i will definitely consider moving

 

do u think it is worth writing a compaint letter to Sky or is it just a waste time as not likely to get any response ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pompey..Its the same has all insurances ..they all rip you off..But ive got peace of mind having Sky insurance..I know i end up paying for it over and over ..BUT id rather pay £8.08 per month than having to find a call out charge and repairs to me Sky box if it went wrong..

 

If i add up all that my car insurance company hav add out of me in the last 24 years and NO CLAIMS i could of brought me self a roller

 

Been paying it 12 mths and called them out twice ..Hav a Brand New Box now..That would of cost heaps more without the insurance

Link to post
Share on other sites

BUT id rather pay £8.08 per month than having to find a call out charge and repairs to me Sky box if it went wrong..

Babydoll that's just it there is no need to pay those call out charges because sky want your business if they try and charge you, you just ask to be put though to cancellations.

 

It works everytime they would rather come out free and carry out repairs etc than lose your business.

 

Ok they only replace with a reconditioned unit instead of new but a reconditioned one is as good as

 

I have had my latest box which is reconditioned now for 2 years and its still going strong.

 

As for motor insurance with due respect that is a different kettle of fish as that includes third party cover which if you claim can run into thousands.

 

Warranty cover on many electrical products is a total rip off as 9 times out of 10 the product will be very reliable and indeed it would be better and cheaper to just replace it.

 

Also remember the sale of goods act comes into play here to which safe guards you for far longer than a manufacturer warranty.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

First off all, whats problems are you experiencing with your Sky? From what you have mentioned about the phone causing interference that sounds like a load of old clap trap to me, I have a Wi-Fi router and a DECT phone sat right on top of my Sky HD box and never have a problem with it.

 

Freesat is the same as Freeview but transmitted over satellite rather than through an aerial. It is a one off purchase for the box, if you already have an existing Sky dish then you can connect it to this and it should work absolutely fine. You are under no contract and there are no monthly fee's, but there are NO extra channels available at the moment, only the basic free to air ones.

 

If you connect it to your existing dish and then in the future, doesnt matter if its 1 minute or 100 years later, you have a problem with the signals, you are responsible for sorting out the problem, unless the reciever has gone faulty and it is still under warranty.

 

If you purchase a complete system and installation then the works should be warrantied for the first 12 months.

 

Basically, if you are having problems with Sky, and they have changed the box several times and you are experiencing exactly the same fault everytime, then you are either really unlucky getting a box with an identicaly fault each time, or there is something else wrong somewhere. if the problem is with the dish/LNB/Cable run, then you WILL probably experience a similar problem with Freesat.

 

Post what problems you are experiencing and I will see if I can help you figure out what is wrong with your system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

after having so many recycled boxes and then change of cable complained to them in writing and now they gave me a HD box but dont have a HD tv unfortunately :sad: but i got all my channels back yaaayyy. thanks for everyones advice :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...