Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Morgans/Morgan Stanley CCJ Help required


oneahead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5030 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just received letter from Morgan solicitors on behalf of Cabot. They say i am obliged to reply by virtue of Practice Direction. In short, i have been down the usual route for documentation pursuant to Civil Procedures. I have only received the following.

 

A very poor copy of an application with no prescribed terms.

 

A copy of a credit agreement with no personal details - just a generic copy.

 

A reproduction letter "welcome to Cabot" with no personal details.

 

Cabot response - legibility of document was clear at time of entering agreement, copies of NOA's are not retained on record and was sent to last known address, ( i have no such letter ).

 

No payment has been made since Feb 2009 when account was put in dispute. I have no default notices but may have received one.

 

What should my next step be? Should i now SAR?

 

Thanks in advance.

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have a claim form from Northampton for a Cabot debt, Morgans are the solicitors. Details are as follows:-

 

Debt above 5,000 and below 10,000

Originally Morgan Stanley

Requested agreement early 2009, received Sept 2009

CCA does not contain prescribed terms

Requested again pursuant to CPR and same copy provided

My agreement is signed and dated by both parties

 

They state the prescribed terms are contained in a seperate page which would have been page 2 of the CCA. They have sent a copy of the supposed 2nd page. There is nothing to indicate that this belongs to my agreement.

 

I have acknowledged claim online and will defend. If anyone can help it would be greatly appreciated.

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you let us know the date of issue of the claim form. As you have acknowledged service, you will have 33 days from the date of ISSUE to enter your defence.

 

Have you sent a CPR 31.14 request for documents mentioned in the claim form .

 

Can you let us know exactly what it says on the claim form removing any values, account numbers and other personal identifiers.

 

Meanwhile, have a read of the following threads.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/241827-legal-action-how-start.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/255329-cpr-18-cpr-31-a.html

 

There are a lot of Cabot claims in the legal forums, might be a good idea to have a read of some of them. :)

 

As a claim has been issued against you, I have moved your thread to the legal issues forums where you will get lots of advice.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

More questions:

 

Have you at any time received a Default Notice from the original creditor.

 

If so, can you please remove any personal information, but leave dates on, scan it in and post it up using an image hosting site such as

 

Image hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket

 

thanks

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is credit card. Issue date of claim form is 14th June. Yes CPR used to request documentation.

 

"The Claiment is the Assignee of a debt from Goldfish Bank. Notice of Assignment having been given to the Defendant in writing. Despite demand for payment ****>** remains due. The Claimant claims ****>** and interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 and costs"

 

They have sent me a representation letter of a Notice of Assignment. I have no default/termination letters although these may have been sent. Do i need to SAR? and if so whom?

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is credit card. Issue date of claim form is 14th June. Yes CPR used to request documentation.

 

"The Claiment is the Assignee of a debt from Goldfish Bank. Notice of Assignment having been given to the Defendant in writing. Despite demand for payment ****>** remains due. The Claimant claims ****>** and interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 and costs"

 

They have sent me a representation letter of a Notice of Assignment. I have no default/termination letters although these may have been sent. Do i need to SAR? and if so whom?

 

If you are going send a SAR, then it needs to go to the original creditor. It will cost you £10.00. Sadly, I doubt you will receive the information in time to be of any value as they are allowed 40 days to provide it.

 

The POC is vague and doesnt really give you sufficient information to submit a fully particularised defence.

 

Did you ever receive the original Notice of Assignment ? This is important because it should have been sent to you via recorded delivery post. It also has to be accurate in every respect.

 

You will need to see a copy of the original Default Notice. It is as statutory requirement in order for the creditor to take the next step ie final demand, then court. If the DN was dated after December 2006 then it will have needed to have given you 14 clear days to remedy the breach. Allowing either 2 working days for 1st class post or 4 working days for 2nd or UK Mail/TNT post on top of the 14 calendar days. The amount requested on the DN needs to be accurate as well.

 

I see they are claiming s69 interest, which isnt permitted.. sigh... !!! And........ they dont plead it is an agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974...

 

 

 

The Claimant fails to plead that this claim concerns an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act, 1974. However, the Claimant claims interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act, 1984 which the Claimant should surely know they are not entitled to by virtue of the County Courts (Interest on Judgment Debts) Order, 1991 (SI 1991 No. 1184 (L. 12)) in particular section 2(3)(a), which clearly prohibits such an award:

 

· The general rule

 

2(3) Interest shall not be payable under this Order where the relevant judgment - (a) is given in proceedings to recover money due under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

 

 

So what information did you ask for in your CPR 31.14 ?

Reading the claim, I would say you could ask for the

assignment

default notice

Final demand/termination notice

agreement

statements in order to establish if the sum they are claiming for is accurate.

 

If you didnt ask for all the above, send a further CPR31.14 letter asking for what you missed off first time.

Oh, and I work out your defence would need to be submitted by 17th July 2010. But as that is a saturday, would suggest it was filed by the 16th.

If you dont receive the information requested in time then you should ask for and extension via CPR15.5.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

MSDW cards are application forms which have been cut and paste with the "Financial Particulars" pasted on the bottom or at the side on the back. The T&Cs are usually Goldfish's, not MSDWs. There are examples on site for you to compare with. Desperate Daniella is the expert on this. When I complained to Cabot that what they sent me was a cut and paste, they sent me a different type of cut and paste! (idiots) and I never heard from them again. Is it possible for you to scan and post yours so we can have a look? Cover over your personal details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have just received a CCJ. Claim was admitted by myself and expenditure form completed. The court has decided that i should pay over £200 a month on a £5,500 debt until cleared. I offered £15 a month on the expenditure form. I am challenging the amount and believe this will be held at my local court. My questions are :

 

Will i have to take proof of income/outgoings?

 

What are the chances of getting the amount reduced?

 

There is no way i can afford this monthly amount and i am afraid i will lose my home. Can anyone, from experience, tell me what the likely outcome will be?

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may help you if you have income and expenditure forms completed using CCCS or Community Legal Advice (or both) - it depends how much time you have left.

 

If time is short and you have to do it yourself - you will have to prove your income and outgoings with copies of bank statements, bills etc. It would help if you had access to a template for doing this. CAB should also be able to assist here.

 

The Court should only make you pay as much as you can reasonably afford.

 

It is highly unlikely you will lose your home. If the Claimant were to go down this route they would first need to get a Charging Order against your property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was given a date by which to pay the first installment on the original judgement but because this is impossible to pay (hence my redetermination hearing) no payment was made. Can they now apply for a charging order even though i have appealed?

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...