Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
    • why do you need adobe...use a pdf online website. all for now...no get reading up and do not miss your defence filing date no matter what. post it up in good time no!!    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5076 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Really hoping someone can help me .. im really desperate ;-/

 

I wont bore you with the background but my Dad recently passed away and its been a troublesome time. I havnt been my usual self and have let a few things slip.

 

A few months ago i got a £90 fine for no MOT. It was the day before the test, and i shouldnt have driven the car but i did.

 

I couldnt pay the fine as we have been super broke, and like i said i havnt been myself so i ingored it / forgot about it / wallowed in self pity.

 

May 10th i was written to by Philips Bailiffs saying the debt was passed to them and it was now £165 ( £90 fine and £75 for their fees )

 

I called them May 18th and explained that i couldnt pay since i was extremely broke and we were struggling to even buy food. They wouldnt accept a small nominal payment to show willing, and i got frustrated and said i would call back.

 

June 14th i receive another letter from them ... the amount has gone up to £365 !!!

 

The relevent part of the letter reads

 

" Despite previous correspondence and an attendance to your premises you have failed to make suitable arrangements to discharge your arrears. YOur account will shortly be passed to our removal bailiffs for IMMEDIATE exectuion by way of the seizure and sale of goods to clear the arrears you have failed to pay "

 

So i phone them up, and say that no bailiff has attended my property. They claim a bailiff attended June 7th at 4.30pm ... well we were in all day on that day, i know for a fact as it was the anniversary of my wife's brothers death, and i know we were here all day. No one knocked at the door or rang the doorbell, and no card of any kind was left.

 

I told them this on the phone and they said a bailiff definately attended. The guy on the phone actually said " oh he will have only knkcoed once cos he has a lot of houses to cover " !!!! .. i also told them definately no card was put through my door, and the guy said " it was probably just a scrap of paper " !!!!!!!!

 

£200 fees added on for that ? and i question if they are making this up!

 

I told them that fair enough i know i have to pay the £90, that is my debt and im responsible for it .. i think i would even pay the extra £75 taking it to £165, but to add £200 on for a phantom bailiff visit seems insane and exessive ... how is this meant to help someone clearly in a terrible financial position ?

 

I argued for ages with the guy .. he said the only way he could put a hold on the account and thus stop it incurring further charges was if i paid something on my debit card, which i told him i couldndt do.

 

I told him i would get back to them within 48 hours, thinking i would do some research before getting back in touch.

 

I just received some amazing help a year ago through this forum, and im really hoping someone can advice me of my rights and best way to proceed please.

 

Thanks in advance x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blue Scholar,

I note your bereavement and wondered how long ago that now is? Also, you're broke. Is there any particular reason? Just curious...

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the reply.

 

My Dad actually passed before christmas but it has affected me terribly.

 

I am broke for a number of reasons .. my ( fairly large ) business went bust last year and i lost everything, my house, my car, the kitchen sink .. just havnt recovered from that really

 

I cant stay down forever but it has been a challenging time to say the least

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i am on benefits sadly after only having ever claimed them for 2 weeks twelve years ago. My health hasnt been great. A Year before the company went bust my doctor diagnosed me with acute stress, which causes me to break out in shingles when it gets really bad .. i say break out, it has happened to me twice in the last 18 months and its embarassing and horrible.

 

My doc advised me to take at least 3 months off work but i couldnt at the time as the company needed me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shingles - yuk! That is not a pleasant thing to get. I know!

I'm not sure - obviously - what benefits you're on. Income based JSA or ESA? Either is usefull.

 

The National Standards for Enforcement Agents would probably class you as being vulnerable:

 

Department for Constitutional Affairs - Enforcement - National Standards for Enforcement Agents

 

Those who might be considered vulnerable include the following:

the elderly;

people with a disability;

the seriously ill;

the recently bereaved;

single parent families;

pregnant women;

unemployed people; and,

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

 

I've highlighted 'seriously ill' purely as illustrative if you're still seeing a GP or other NHS Healthcare professional for treatment. The list isn't exhaustive, are there any other boxes you tick?

 

Don't be ashamed of being in receipt of State benefits. You've paid for them and we cannot always have control of our circumstances.

 

I would suggest you write to the relevant court detailing your vulnerable status and include proof of benefits and supporting evidence from your GP if appropriate. Request a re-hearing on the basis that the court is not aware of your personal circumstances. Including an income / outgoings statement will do no harm either. Copy to the bailiffs.

 

Philips Collections Services [assuming these are who you are dealing with] are members of the Enforcement Services Association whose Code of Practice (section 2) states clearly that members must abide by the National Standards for Enforcement Agents...

 

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - Philips are known to make up visits - phone Westminster council, speak to Mr Watssman in customer relations. Tell him Philips are claiming a visit to your property, when in fact you know this didn't happen. Tell him you know this is not the first case he will have heard, and if they don't put the case on hold, you will hold them liable. Tell Philips you want exact details of the visits - time, dates, information on your door colour, did they knock/ring etc.. - you are bound to get them on one of those things. I did - they had the wrong door colour for my house. They may charge you £10 for the privilege, get that sent recorded delivery, they lost my first tenner. Make sure you record all emails you send to Philips, and make sure you tell Westminster you're in dispute until Philips send you the requested information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...