Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is great news. Many people would have given up and paid after losing two appeals so well done for hanging in and fighting. It has paid off and they have finally backed down before getting whipped in Court. I looked at your NTD and your NTK again to see if there was a chance of going for a breach of your GDPR. Sadly although your NTK on its own could have well deserved a claim, the NTD is good enough not to warrant a claim even though it wasn;t compliant with PoFA. As it is the first Notice that mostly accounts for  GDPR breaches there is a reasonable cause for the NTD to have been issued. However you are now freed from worries about appearing in Court and you have learnt about the dangers of parking especially where the rogues that patrol private parking spaces are concerned. Thank you for making a donation and should you fall victim in the future to the parking rogues or anything else that we protect from, you are always welcome .
    • Hi guys I'm about to submit the defence as per below     There has been no reply to our CPR 31:14 request.  Is it worth adding that I (driver, not registered keeper) didn't actually enter or park in the car park and was sat at the petrol station forecourt the entire time?  Or is that covered by the simple points?   Thanks
    • a DCA is not a bailiff and cant enforce anything, even if they've been to court who are they please? sar to the original creditor FIO isnt applicable they are not a public body. who was this query sent too all the more reason to teach her young upon how these powerless DCA's monsters  work... she must stop payments now  
    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is My Agreement Enforceable - CCA request to Santander


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5090 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Sorry to butt in on this thread but I have sent a CCA request to santander regarding a burton store card.

 

I have recieved a letter and also a orginal copy of my agreement - I am a little confused as to whether or not this is enforceable.

 

From where I am sitting it seems they have me by the short and curlys, can anyone see any different and if I can challenge this on what basis?

 

any help would be greatly recieved.

 

Essex

Santander Burtons card letter .jpg

Consumer Credit Agreement for Burtons card Santander.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've moved your post & created a new thread for you.

 

They are too small to read, can you upload them to tinypic or photobucket & then copy and paste the 2ynp5wp.jpg

 

 

3096d79.jpg

 

Can anyone shed any light for me?

 

Thanks in advance guys.

Edited by Essex Don
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Don't see a credit limit or amount anywhere.

 

Yes, I misread, my apologies - it's an 08 agreement. :( Just I thought I'd found you something that would make it uneforceable.

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't see a credit limit or amount anywhere. Not sure if that matters, though.

 

The figure of £300 has been scrawled on the bottom of the agreement and I believe this is the credit limit on the card - to be fair as I have been sent a photocopy whats to stop them writing this on the orginal agreement in ink and then photocopy it to send on to me to make it look like this was discussed at point of signing in store?

 

Can anyone shed some light?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Well, I did see £300 but also wondered if that was connected to the section right at the bottom eg someone making calculations - it's not clearly defined in anyway whether they attempt to imply it was done in store anyway so I don't know how they'd get away with that TBH if they tried to argue it was the credit limit; I took it to be random scribbling TBH without any reference to what it was. However, to answer your question directly on that: nothing. Thought I don't see any credit limit or reference to what the balance is in the cover letter, it mentions a statement of account? Did they send you one or just that agreement?

 

Then there's the matter of you having this copy so if they did try that, this is the copy they have issued you as your credit agreement and presented as thus from them. So if they did do that it would probably be very easy for anyone to tell, even if it went to court. Hope I am making sense. I don't think they've obligated your request properly as there is no way for you to tell - apart from that figure which could be related to anything - what your credit limit was at the time you opened the account. I might be wrong but I am trying to see what things are missing in order to put it into dispute and that they've not fulfilled your request fully.

 

What I am trying to say is - whilst flying about on other websites as well as this one - is there are no links anywhere on that document to say that's your credit limit as written ... The OFT guidelines on unfair means were in my mind earlier and not making things clear to a debtor.

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I did see £300 but also wondered if that was connected to the section right at the bottom eg someone making calculations - it's not clearly defined in anyway whether they attempt to imply it was done in store anyway so I don't know how they'd get away with that TBH if they tried to argue it was the credit limit; I took it to be random scribbling TBH without any reference to what it was. However, to answer your question directly on that: nothing. Thought I don't see any credit limit or reference to what the balance is in the cover letter, it mentions a statement of account? Did they send you one or just that agreement?

 

Then there's the matter of you having this copy so if they did try that, this is the copy they have issued you as your credit agreement and presented as thus from them. So if they did do that it would probably be very easy for anyone to tell, even if it went to court. Hope I am making sense. I don't think they've obligated your request properly as there is no way for you to tell - apart from that figure which could be related to anything - what your credit limit was at the time you opened the account. I might be wrong but I am trying to see what things are missing in order to put it into dispute and that they've not fulfilled your request fully.

 

What I am trying to say is - whilst flying about on other websites as well as this one - is there are no links anywhere on that document to say that's your credit limit as written ... The OFT guidelines on unfair means were in my mind earlier and not making things clear to a debtor.

 

Ok I think I understand what your saying - as far as your concerned the only thing missing that I can highlight to them and fight against is the credit limit right?

 

Is there a generic letter template that I can use to fire off to them to see if they will buckle?

 

I have tried looking for one on here myself but I am unable to find one - any help would be most welcome.

 

One last thing they have sent me another document which I will scan and copy now - I didnt think it was relevant until now but let me know what you think.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Don't know which template letter ... apart from the dispute letter for non-compliance with a CCA request. Which if there is no reference to any credit limit on any documents they've sent you - by this I mean a clearly printed and not handwritten figure which would be dubious anyway without it saying somewhere next to it 'this is your credit limit' and ... least to me it would be questionable anyway without a link to anything else. (?) then how on Earth are you meant to see what you agreed to when you signed up for it? I hope there is something in all this for you and that I am not trying to look for something that isn't there. But to me that doesn't look right what they've sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

More than likely it does as it's the Statement of Account. Sorry if I got your hopes up. :(

 

Because what I was hoping for was that that document was missing so you could have put the account into dispute or something like that anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More than likely it does as it's the Statement of Account. Sorry if I got your hopes up. :(

 

I dont see how it can though as this third document is the first time I have seen it and I have never ever signed anything relating to it??

 

The credit agreement that doesnt have the credit limit on it but this document is just a print off from their system??

 

Is there anyone who knows the law and can shed a legal view on whether or not I can or it is worth me contesting this one??

 

Thanks in advance guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

They have complied with Section 78 request. What you have to do is the DPA SAR and ask for all documentation and statements and any telephone records they hold regarding this account. This will cost you £10.00

 

para 5 does does state a credit limit for retail purchases of £1500.00 and 12 equal repayment instalments the interest on this being £223.74.

 

It then goes on in Clause 6 to explain how they will apply the repayments to the account.

 

IMHO this is enforceable on the face of it.

 

I am not sure what the £300.,00 refers to, This would be discovered from the SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

However, I had seen it before but just took a look at the regulations surrounding what a credit agreement should contain:

 

The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations The Regulations apply to all regulated consumer credit agreements and consumer hire agreements, including modifying agreements.

In particular, the agreement must contain certain financial and other information. This must be set out in a specified order, with sub-headings, and shown together as a whole. The information must be of equal prominence, and easily legible.

In the case of credit agreements, the required information is:

 

  • nature of the agreement
  • parties to the agreement
  • key financial information (including the amount of credit or the credit limit, the duration of the agreement, the APR, the total amount payable, and the amounts and timing of repayments)
  • other financial information (including a description and cash price of goods or services, any advance payments, the total charge for credit, the rate of interest, how and when interest charges are calculated and applied, the order of allocation of payments, and variable rates and charges)
  • key Information (including default or other charges, any security provided by the borrower, and prescribed statements of the protection and remedies available to the borrower), and
  • a signature box, and other form of consent where applicable.

Both the borrower and the lender must sign the agreement. A copy of the executed agreement must be given to the borrower, either when he signs it or within seven days. A further copy of the unexecuted agreement may also need to be provided. If the agreement is cancellable (because it was signed off trade premises), notice of cancellation rights must be included in the copy agreement, and must also generally be sent by post or email to the borrower within seven days.

If the above requirements are not met, the lender can only enforce the agreement against the borrower by getting a court order. Local authority trading standards services or the OFT can take enforcement action against the lender, using powers in Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002.

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) has issued guidance on the 2004 Regulations. Download the BERR guidance (pdf 64 kb).

 

Right, now I've confused everyone else let alone myself. :(

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

They have complied with Section 78 request. What you have to do is the DPA SAR and ask for all documentation and statements and any telephone records they hold regarding this account. This will cost you £10.00

 

para 5 does does state a credit limit for retail purchases of £1500.00 and 12 equal repayment instalments the interest on this being £223.74.

 

It then goes on in Clause 6 to explain how they will apply the repayments to the account.

 

IMHO this is enforceable on the face of it.

 

I am not sure what the £300.,00 refers to, This would be discovered from the SAR

 

 

Hi Mrs Hobbit,

 

Thanks for the info - the only problem is the credit limit has NEVER EVER been £1500.

 

Section 5 is referred to as an example payment if the credit limit was set at £1500 and the apr charged on 12 equal payments would be £223.74 ???

 

Does this affect the situation?

 

Also once I have done the Data Protection Act Subject access request and recieved it what is the next step or angle for me to argue?

 

Thanking you in advance.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

It is set as required by regulations. The companies went to great pains to make sure all the new Agreements fully complied with the new Act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, I had seen it before but just took a look at the regulations surrounding what a credit agreement should contain:

 

The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations The Regulations apply to all regulated consumer credit agreements and consumer hire agreements, including modifying agreements.

In particular, the agreement must contain certain financial and other information. This must be set out in a specified order, with sub-headings, and shown together as a whole. The information must be of equal prominence, and easily legible.

In the case of credit agreements, the required information is:

 

  • nature of the agreement
  • parties to the agreement
  • key financial information (including the amount of credit or the credit limit, the duration of the agreement, the APR, the total amount payable, and the amounts and timing of repayments)
  • other financial information (including a description and cash price of goods or services, any advance payments, the total charge for credit, the rate of interest, how and when interest charges are calculated and applied, the order of allocation of payments, and variable rates and charges)
  • key Information (including default or other charges, any security provided by the borrower, and prescribed statements of the protection and remedies available to the borrower), and
  • a signature box, and other form of consent where applicable.

Both the borrower and the lender must sign the agreement. A copy of the executed agreement must be given to the borrower, either when he signs it or within seven days. A further copy of the unexecuted agreement may also need to be provided. If the agreement is cancellable (because it was signed off trade premises), notice of cancellation rights must be included in the copy agreement, and must also generally be sent by post or email to the borrower within seven days.

If the above requirements are not met, the lender can only enforce the agreement against the borrower by getting a court order. Local authority trading standards services or the OFT can take enforcement action against the lender, using powers in Part 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002.

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) has issued guidance on the 2004 Regulations. Download the BERR guidance (pdf 64 kb).

 

Right, now I've confused everyone else let alone myself. :(

 

 

AGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH :)

 

I am so confused,

 

Can anyone with experience on this sort of thing help us make sense of this?

 

Appreciate your help so far cartaphilus :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

Section 5 is referred to as an example payment if the credit limit was set at £1500 and the apr charged on 12 equal payments would be £223.74 ???

 

Does this affect the situation?

 

.......................................................................

 

No. it doesn't change the situation as much i would love to tell you it does.

 

Did you get a letter telling what the credit limit was, this is known as the card carrier

 

The account number is clearly identified, you should remove this detail....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
Thanks for the info - the only problem is the credit limit has NEVER EVER been £1500.

 

I've also just realized as well that your account number can be seen on the very bottom of the agreement.

 

Going to watch Big Brother now before I get into more muddles thinking about this agreement and seeing if it could be made unenforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 5 is referred to as an example payment if the credit limit was set at £1500 and the apr charged on 12 equal payments would be £223.74 ???

 

Does this affect the situation?

 

.......................................................................

 

No. it doesn't change the situation as much i would love to tell you it does.

 

Did you get a letter telling what the credit limit was, this is known as the card carrier

 

Nope never recieved any such letter - when should this have been sent to me? at point of signing or shortly after or any time after the agreement signing date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I was just thinking as it's not made totally clear that is the amount just that any purchases up to that amount. Though, wouldn't it be the case as with any credit limit the initial sum of credit be based on the person's financial situation at the time of application ie if for example the credit limit was set at £300 - for arguments sake just because it's a figure already mentioned and written on the bottom? Which may or may not be £1500 and could well have been set initially at £300?

 

I've also just realized as well that your account number can be seen on the very bottom of the agreement.

 

Going to watch Big Brother now before I get into more muddles thinking about this agreement and seeing if it could be made unenforceable.

 

 

The credit limit was set as £300 for this agreement and has always been this since day one - I know this from my first statement but nowhere on this agreement does it state that my "credit limit" is £300.

 

The only thing it does have is a inked amount of £300 scrawled at the bottom of the agreement which could be argued that was added after the time of signing?

 

I was also not given a copy of my agreement when I signed it???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Just blot it out like you did with the rest of the form.

 

This was an in store application

 

Wondering if this, then, could be classed as a pre-application form if done in store? Just thinking of other ways here. Anyway, I will leave you to it ... Really felt it was onto something earlier but ... Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

It looks like that £300.00 was the credit limit they told you about when you applied for the account and it was written on the form at the time. the problem here is, if it goes to Court, they will say under oath this normal practise and produce similar agreements to demonstrate this to the Judge. I am playing Devil's Advocate here as I have seen this happen. You could argue that it was added afterwards, but again the burden of proof would be on you regarding this.

 

On your statements each month it will also have the credit limit of the account.

 

I sound so full of gloom, but having seen so many of these Agreements in the past, the loopholes have been closed. I am surprised that you didn;t get a letter stating the credit limit after opening the account. this in itself is not enough to make the agreement uneforceable. We cut our teeth on the old agreements and at the inception of the new agreements, we went over them with a fine tooth comb and found they complied with the recommendations,.maybe not as fully we would have liked to see it happen but then again we old campaigners wanted the system tightened to make the companies comply with current legislation and amendments.

 

How to edit the post? hit the edit button on the relevant post and delete the document, then post up document again with the number covered. I hope I have explained this clearly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...