Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cash refund denied - faulty PC confirmed by Dell


mbass
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5097 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

sorry, I've searched for a while, but I couldn't find my question answered already.

I bought a brand new Dell laptop from PCWorld on the 6th of February,

I had a few problems since then regarding the screen, after a few calls with Dell, and after they sent an engineer to my place to change the whole motherboard (never seen that before!!), Dell themselves told me they are going to give me a full refund and gave me a "call number" to show to PCWorld for this.

Fair enough, I went then to PCWorld with the laptop, receipt and Dell number, asked for my refund in cash but they said nope: you can either get voucher or a replacement with the same machine.

Now, this is like forcing me to buy my next laptop from them again (NB: as soon as I mentioned this, they warned me: "Hey, how dare you! We don't force anybody to do anything!"), however I wanted to be free to go and buy my next laptop somewhere else, since I've found better prices on the internet...

Now, I called Dell again and they confirmed I am entitled to ask for the refund in cash, so I went to speak the manager at PCWorld again and he told me nope again.

What can I do now? What does the law says? Am I allowed to get a cash refund or not?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoning customer services won't help.

 

Their company policy states that within 28 days you'll get an exchange or refund. Outside of 28 days you'll recieve a repair, exchange or credit note.

 

I'd suggest putting your complaint in writing to head office, but they have no legal obligation to offer you a cash refund. So long as they offer a remedy that results in you owning a working laptop of the same or better specification without greatly inconveniancing you they're legaly doing nothing wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I've not heard of this before, although Dell can't force a refund it would be for them to repair / replace (if they can do it within 28 days) not Pc World. Pc World would replace after 28 days.

 

How long was it when the fault was reported and how long did it take to get repaired?

 

Motherboards do get replaced, so its not something that's unheard of.

 

Its dependant on how long it took to get repaired, the store may argue that they want to try and get it repaired within its time period. Dell are usually 7 days, so they may push for this.

 

Chris

Tech Guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

being on both sides of the fence [business and consumer repairs]

dell will refund you but sadly as a public consumer you have to go thru your retailer, and again what is said is correct from pc world.

 

i dont know how you can resolve this, p'haps it might be an idea for dell to speak to pc world, though i agree its rare for cash to be exchanged.

 

if you had brought it direct from dell you'ed get a refund.

 

this happens with us all the time. [not retail though]

 

now, a new MB will sort your issues though, so my gut reaction is to go with that.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What can I do now? What does the law says? Am I allowed to get a cash refund or not?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks

 

The law says simply - If you take goods back to the seller because they are of unsatisfactory quality, not fit for their purpose or do not match their description then you do not have to accept a credit note, you are within your legal rights to ask for your money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are entitled to a refund as a consumer by the following parts in the SOGA:

 

s. 48C which allows for you to rescind from the contract if the seller cannot repair or replace the product within a reasonable amount of time.

 

or

 

s. 35 By non-acceptance of the goods and as so rejecting them for breaches in s. 14, where acceptance can be by saying you have accepted the goods, or by keeping them for a period of time without imitating to the seller that he has rejected them.

 

With regards to this case it comes to the matter of the latter entitlement, as PC World have fulfilled the former by offering a replacement.

 

It comes down to whether the OP has deemed to have accepted the goods in terms of s. 35 of the SOGA. Most retailers take 28 days as an acceptance period, such a period depends on circumstances and goods, in something like this it would matter when the faults started occuring and if PC World was informed.

 

If faults started occurring within 6 weeks and have been reported within this period there is the likelihood that you are entitled to reject the goods. If the period is longer it is debatable to whether you have accepted or not.

 

Dell cannot make PC World provide a refund, it is them the contract is with. You are within your legal rights to ask for a cash refund, they are also within their rights currently to refuse such a request. Don't take store credit, nor a replacement if you really don't want one and stick to your guns. If you could tell us when the faults started occurring it would be a massive help.

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...