Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest have issued statutory demand - Advice please **Set Aside**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 361
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

True UK

 

but have a letter of crapquest saying they have give up and i need now to contact Barclays

 

see why i am confused

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under which section of the INSOLVENCY Act cant they?

 

 

Have You Confirmed With The Registry Trust That There Is In Fact A Ccj

 

Have You Been Paying The Court Any Money Ref This Ccj

 

If There Is A Ccj, Why Is Crappyquest Issuing An Sd, They Cant As The Account Is Terminated

 

If They Are The Creditor, They Have To Enforce Through The Court, Baliffs, Attachment Of Earnings Ets, Not An Sd

Link to post
Share on other sites

no havent done the registry

 

paid barclays 10 a month for 18 months in 2002 to 2003 then stopped couldn't afford it

 

havent herd a thing since 2003 till crapquest in may this year

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

had this a couple of days ago

 

on another debt a solicitor for lowells sent a county court papers, i put in a full defence herd nothing had a letter from court stating if nothing in 28 days it was styed. that was oct 2009 then last week had a demand for payment from the same solicitor quoting the court case number in the document, but as i said i hadnt gone to court or anything to put my defence.

 

are they trying to frighten people by sending court papers if you difend drop them then months later try again

 

that cant be legal

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Agreed Mr Barry Davies is a pain to get hold of via the normal phone numbers.

Here are his full details

Barry Davies | Head of Legal Services | CapQuest Group Limited | Fleet27 | Rye Close | Fleet | Hampshire | GU51 2QQ | Direct Dial: 0871 574 3068 | Fax: 0871 574 3068 | Mobile: 07920 136 054 | Email [email protected]

 

2) How can you claim not to have received the SD when you know its full contents.

3) RE: The Effect of failing to comply with CCA ACT, Capquest have judgement against the defendant, therefore, the Claimant need not prove his case any further.

 

 

 

 

scan0001-8.jpg

 

scan0002-3.jpg

 

there still needs form 6.4 to fill out

 

ill email them you as an attachment for you to print off and ill include your personal details also if required

 

let me know

 

 

you need to take form 6.4 & 6.5 with the stat demand to your local court

 

give them a call and as if they take bankrupcy petitions, if not, they will tell you the nearest one

 

ask the court clerk if you can swear an affadavit, (its free)

 

thats it then

 

make three copies of the docs and take to the court

 

 

it needs to be gone over to tidy it up a bit and ill do that when i know what you decide

 

its just a rough draft

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me Thinks A Late Witness Statement Is In Order

 

As The Application Is Tuesday, You Will Need To Fax It Monday To The Court

 

Ok People

 

Lets Get Our Heads Togeather

 

Me Thinks They Cant Enforce With Out The Permission Of The Court As A Period Of Six Years Has Passed

 

Comments PeOple

 

Signing Off As I Realy Do Need To Get Back To Work

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be a good idea if you start a new thread for Lowells,

 

Post a copy of the Claim form and your defence and ill have a look

 

had this a couple of days ago

 

on another debt a solicitor for lowells sent a county court papers, i put in a full defence herd nothing had a letter from court stating if nothing in 28 days it was styed. that was oct 2009 then last week had a demand for payment from the same solicitor quoting the court case number in the document, but as i said i hadnt gone to court or anything to put my defence.

 

are they trying to frighten people by sending court papers if you difend drop them then months later try again

 

that cant be legal

Link to post
Share on other sites

done it

 

this is the one i took to the court

 

will re post in a min due to edit

Edited by shedder101

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did think this was i saw the dates of 2003 on one of the posts in this thread.

 

When was the last payment on the account?

 

Me Thinks A Late Witness Statement Is In Order

 

As The Application Is Tuesday, You Will Need To Fax It Monday To The Court

 

Ok People

 

Lets Get Our Heads Togeather

 

Me Thinks They Cant Enforce With Out The Permission Of The Court As A Period Of Six Years Has Passed

 

Comments PeOple

 

Signing Off As I Realy Do Need To Get Back To Work

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...anyone out there willing to provide a witness statement in time for Shedder that Barry Davies does NOT respond to 'phone calls and CANNOT be contacted?

 

Shedder, get an answer to each of the points Bazza makes. It might be worthwhile starting a new urgent thread on the legal issues forum??

Mozzone

_______________

Taking on the bloodsuckers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok and what was the date of the judgement

 

well this is the point i dont know

 

there has been no CCJ on my credit file to my knowledge i really don't know and i have checked my credit file last week and nothing shows

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

the witness statement? does that need to be sent to the court as i am going on monday to put in my costs as per advice from Post

 

so should i not put in my cost form

had my SD Set aside thanks to CAG

won with lowells thanks to CAG

dont ask me though these are the people to help:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it does

 

 

I am doing one now, which will help the judge understand the problems that so many people have with Capquest. PS, once a copy lands in the hands of Davies, he wont be a happy bunney

 

the witness statement? does that need to be sent to the court as i am going on monday to put in my costs as per advice from Post

 

so should i not put in my cost form

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a basic witness statement that I have done for you to hand the court, might help the judge make an informed decision.

 

If you contact me by PM, I will provide you with a proper signed version

 

 

 

 

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF UK26

 

 

I, UK26 of XXXXXXXXX say as follows:

 

I have been involved personally in a previous case with the Capquest Group of Companies. The matters in this witness statement are of my own knowledge from my dealings with Capquest.

 

1) Capquest purchased an alleged debt account from Capital One Bank “Credit Card Account” and was pursuing me for payment of this alleged account. Once I received correspondence from the company “CapQuest Debt Recovery Limited” I requested copy of the alleged credit agreement from Caqquest Debt Recovery Limited, which was provided to me, at some point in time, however on receipt of this, it was discovered that the agreement was unenforceable in law under the consumer credit act 1974. CapQuest also sent me copies of bank statements which listed all the transactions under the alleged account. It was discovered that more then half of the balance of the account consisted of “Over Limit Fees, Late Payment Fees, Default Charges and Payment Protection Insurance”

 

 

2) The charges where discussed with Capquest Debt Recovery Limited, however was not satisfactory addressed by Capquest Debt Recovery and instead of dealing with the matter concerning the dispute, sent a letter advising its intention of issuing a statutory demand within 7 days of the letter.

 

 

3) The agreement did not permit the creditor the right to make default charges on the account as the term required by the consumer credit act 1974 was missing from the agreement. This was recorded in correspondence to Capquest Debt Recovery Limited but was unsatisfactory addressed by Capquest.

 

 

4) Numerous letters where sent to Capquest advising that the agreement was unenforceable and was duly passed to my solicitors Waller Needham & Green to further make Capquest Debt Recovery Limited aware of its unenforceability of the account.

 

 

5) A reply from Barry Davies who is employed as Head of Legal Services at the Capquest Group of Companies sent a reply to my solicitors Waller Needham & Green asking for us to confirm why the agreement was unenforceable and that they contend that the agreement was indeed enforceable and keep arguing this point in many of the previous correspondence.

 

 

6) My solicitor indeed replied to Capquest making them fully aware of why the agreement was indeed unenforceable. I issued a county court claim against Capquest Debt Recovery Limited and Capquest Investments Limited under case number: xxxxxxxxxx in the Peterborough County Court and was later transferred to Southend County court.

 

 

 

 

7) I tried to contact Mr Barry Davies on many occasions by telephone without success, the contact telephone numbers that Mr Barry Davies provided the court on the N9 Response Pack to my N1 Claim form was “0870 084 2565” This number is for a department within Capquest, and when asked to speak with Mr Barry Davies I was always asked for my Name and contact number and Mr Barry Davies would return my call. At no point in time did Mr Barry Davies return any of my phone calls when requested. I would like to point out that during the last 24 hours before my case was due to go before the district judge for a 3 hour trial, I received a letter from Mr Barry Davies inviting me to contact him by telephone on 0871 574 3068.

 

 

( 8 ) On 1st July 2010 I contacted Mr Barry Davies by telephone as requested on his letter that I received. During this telephone conversation, Mr Barry Davies agreed that the agreement was unenforceable and did not want to take up anymore of the courts time. I am under a confidentiality agreement with Capquest and cannot disclose any specific information. However I would like to make the following noted.

 

 

A) From my very own personal experience with the Capquest Group of Companies, it would appear to me, that if you challenge any of the information they hold against you, they what it would seem is threaten you with Statutory Demands in the hope that the alleged debtors payees money to Capquest to avoid bankruptcy proceedings. My solicitors Waller Needham & Green pointed out to Capquest that this is an abuse of process where there is a litigate dispute.

 

 

B) It is recorded in so many other cases, I hear about what Capquest are doing nationally to most of this customer base, instead of dealing with any enforcement for repayment of debtor accounts via the County Court by issuing a county court claim, it would indeed appear that Capquest are in fact choosing to issue statutory demands as this put greater fear upon people in efforts to try and secure payments that would otherwise not be made unless by order of a court following a successful county court claim against the debtors.

 

I believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true.

………………………………………………….

 

UK 26

 

Dated: 17/07/2010

Edited by UK26
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...