Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Access To Gable End


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a problem with my neighbour, I am having some cavity wall insulation done shortly and have asked to gain access to his property to put some scaffolding, he will have 4 poles in his garden, the company wont do work without scaffolding.

 

I got a defient no from the neighbour, Do I have any rights on this, as i need access to my house to do maintenance.

 

can someone advise

 

thanks

HSBC :Cry:

Data Protection Act sent 25/05 - statements received 06/07

First letter sent 07/07 - no response

Second letter sent 26/07 - 70% offer - refused

MCOL issued 01/09 - acknowledge 05/09.

 

First Direct :D

DPA sent 09/06 statements 22/06

First Letter sent 23/06 - settled in full 28/06

Timecard

DPA sent 04/08 statements 12/09

First Letter sent 12/09

 

Marbles :!:

DPA sent 04/08 statements 24/08

First Letter sent 25/08 - refused to pay

Second Letter sent 26/08

Egg :evil:

DPA sent 04/08 - still awaiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might be a bit stuck here. I can only think of two possibilities - both long shots.

 

1. Party Wall Act 1996 - depending where the boundary of the property is and whether your end wall butts up to it, you may be allowed access for 'maintenance' (s2) , but cavity wall insulation is pushing it a bit.

 

2. An easement allowing you access for maintenance - a total guess and probably extremely unlikely.

 

How about offering the neighbour a bottle (or case) of their favourite tipple for the inconvenience - much easier (and more likely to get a result) than going to law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth asking the neighbour why he has declined permission.

 

It may be he is concerned that the poles will damage his garden; and it may be that the scaffolding company has a way of avoiding that or limiting it to a level your neighbour will tolerate.

 

Tim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 issues:

 

1) If the wall you are working on is a party wall then you need to serve a notice on your neighbour under the Party Wall etc. Act - lots of links explaining this if you google the act

 

2) If it is not a party wall check out the Access to Neighbouring Land Act - again googling this will get you lots of results.

 

3) offer your neighbour the case of wine as suggested above

Link to post
Share on other sites

the scaffolding will be down on concrete, between his water butts, and he wouldnt take a case of wine I am sure of that.

 

It all started 1 year ago, when I was laying parking bay concrete down, he had a bit of dust from the working go on his car and he flew of the handle and started swearing at me, because he had to clean his car again, since then not spoke to him, and he is just being akward, the scaffolding will be up for 2 1/2 days at the max.

HSBC :Cry:

Data Protection Act sent 25/05 - statements received 06/07

First letter sent 07/07 - no response

Second letter sent 26/07 - 70% offer - refused

MCOL issued 01/09 - acknowledge 05/09.

 

First Direct :D

DPA sent 09/06 statements 22/06

First Letter sent 23/06 - settled in full 28/06

Timecard

DPA sent 04/08 statements 12/09

First Letter sent 12/09

 

Marbles :!:

DPA sent 04/08 statements 24/08

First Letter sent 25/08 - refused to pay

Second Letter sent 26/08

Egg :evil:

DPA sent 04/08 - still awaiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah. So he's teaching you a lesson.

 

I expect your taking legal action will only make things worse.

 

Have you tried other insulating companies and told them the problem to see if they can come up with a solution?

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was under the impression they had to drill ap;prox 2" hole to get the insulation in, dont relish 2" holes on inside of house

HSBC :Cry:

Data Protection Act sent 25/05 - statements received 06/07

First letter sent 07/07 - no response

Second letter sent 26/07 - 70% offer - refused

MCOL issued 01/09 - acknowledge 05/09.

 

First Direct :D

DPA sent 09/06 statements 22/06

First Letter sent 23/06 - settled in full 28/06

Timecard

DPA sent 04/08 statements 12/09

First Letter sent 12/09

 

Marbles :!:

DPA sent 04/08 statements 24/08

First Letter sent 25/08 - refused to pay

Second Letter sent 26/08

Egg :evil:

DPA sent 04/08 - still awaiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is 2" then I agree with you. That would take a lot of making good.

Ours was done with a 22mm drill. I would have found this tolerable, especially if I could have persuaded the contractor to drill at discreet points to minimise/conceal cosmetic repair.

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the non court route of trying to tempt your neighbor with a few bottles of his favourite wine etc.

 

If you have to get a County Court order to get access then you'll also be required to "compansate" your neighbor for the inconvience.

 

So a few cases, might just be the cheaper option ;) .

 

Regards,

Tom3131.

Before you take any legal action, please read through the

FAQ's, then if you dont understand something, please ask for advice ;) .

 

If theres a thread in which you think I could help, please PM me using the Private Messaging facility in the top right hand corner of the screen.

 

Advice & opinions of tom3131, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you ha

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...