Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • absolute rubbish, whomever told you that lied to make them sound important. no stores are using face recognition, they are not allowed too it's not been generally licenced by the gov't. it's only in a very few stores in central london. and they most certainly would never waste staff time searching old CCTV they dont even have. it should be wiped by GDPR laws etc after 30days. if you get any silly letters BIN THEM. go see your GP ASAP 
    • Thank you both so much for the reply. I am worried because they told me they have face detection systems in place, that they go back through the CCTV from their other stores and find out I've shoplifted from them before. How likely is this? Also they did not mention anything about DWF solicitors or retail loss prevention. Should I still expect a letter from them? 
    • OK, I've found some time, new version here. Bit in blue that seems to me to be superfluous - but you decide. Crossed out bit where the law has changed. Added bits in red. Only one bit rewritten for clarity in magenta. Here are the two exhibits I mention. That's enough playing with colours by me 🤣   Defendant's WS - version 3.pdf 17_extracted_IPC Code of PracticeV9 V4.pdf Transcript - Excel v Wilkinson.pdf
    • Five fiercest moments from Penny Mordaunt and Angela Rayner’s blazing TV debate leaving Farage a sideshow Nigel Farage and Stephen Flynn were the sideshow as the largest parties fought it out Five fiercest moments from Penny Mordaunt and Angela Rayner’s blazing TV debate – leaving Nigel Farage a sideshow – The Sun | The Sun WWW.THESUN.CO.UK ANGELA Rayner and Penny Mordaunt launched into several fierce clashes in their debate last night.Their tense rows included divides...  
    • Shorter than sunak visit eh?   Nigel Farage dunked on Sunak’s D-Day exit – and this response deserves a medal WWW.THEPOKE.COM Reform leader Farage criticised PM Rishi Sunak for leaving the D-Day anniversary events in order to film a TV interview - and writer Rick... Watch: Nigel Farage has drink thrown over him WWW.BBC.CO.UK The new Reform UK leader was leaving a pub where he had been meeting voters in Clacton.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA debt and threatening court action when payment is already in place


seanamarts
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5163 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry for the long title, and apologies if in the wrong place,

Just a couple of questions that I hope some one can answer for me.

 

1. My daughters partner is paying his CSA plus back payments, not his fault CSA cocked up, which I know is not unusual, he may be made redundant and he has informed the CSA of this in the hope that they will reduce his payments, at the moment he is paying over £400 a month earning roughly £1000 a month, that is not take home. £200 of the £400 he is paying is coming off of the debt, now because he has told the CSA that he may be made redundant they have told him they are now going to take him to court to have an order placed on him so that the bailiff can get involved to clear his debt if he is made redundant. So basically if he gets laid off the bailiffs will automatically go in and seize goods to the amount outstanding. Now can CSA do this when he has never defaulted on any payments (as they come out of his wages any way). It just seems to me that they are going to try this anyway whether he is made redundant or not as they keep asking for him to pay more and this is an impossibility he wont be able to eat at this rate after paying rent, rates and utility bills, he even sold his car to pay off a chunk of the debt, not to mention not being able to afford to run one now, he dosnt smoke or drink and has to have dinner at his parents or at my daughters as he just simply cannot afford to buy food. How can the CSA be able to do this, its just wrong on so many levels, and CAN they do it??

 

2. My son has had an agreement with his ex partner to pay her X an amount each week which has been ok up until my son had been signed off of work in that latter part of last year due to a serious illness which has left him crippled and may never work again,

This has prevented him in being able to pay the amounts that he had agreed because he now has to sign on and is in receipt of benefits High rate DLA included in that. The CSA have now decided that he can no longer have a private arrangement with his ex even though he has tried to give her something each week when he can afford to do so, he is currently living with a partner and has two children with her and see's his eldest every 2 weeks for a weekend. They now take £10 a fortnight from him and his ex dosnt see a penny of this, can this be right?? she has lost out because the CSA have decided to step in even when not asked to buy either party.

hope some one can help me out on this one

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have written to your MP about this mess? they sometimes help in cases like this,

The csa do what they like they prey on people in there net and make there life a misery, and i,m sorry to say yes they can make you bankrupt they have more powers than inland revenue, vat civil servants, its a disgrace, thats why i say you should write to your MP as its them who give them these obsurb rules.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have written to your MP about this mess? they sometimes help in cases like this,

The csa do what they like they prey on people in there net and make there life a misery, and i,m sorry to say yes they can make you bankrupt they have more powers than inland revenue, vat civil servants, its a disgrace, thats why i say you should write to your MP as its them who give them these obsurb rules.

 

Good luck.

Thanks shafted :) that certainly was not an option I thought about,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Seanamarts!

 

1. First point - the employer can not deduct more than 40% of your daughters partners net income - you have 60% protected income - so if this has been breached then this is breaking the law and he should speak with his employer about the amount they are deducting.

With regards to being made redundant - the csa can only act when the change actually happens or if you can confirm a date when it will happen.. you need to tell them as soon as you know this - they can then start to recalculate.

With regards to the liabilty order/bailiff action - this is very unlikely as payments are being made, they have to follow legal procedures first - like issue warning letters for missing payments, if these payments have been made then they cant pursue.. they have to understand that there is only so much you can physically pay. However - if an agreement is in place to repay arrears - and this arrangement is not going to clear the arrears in 2years - legal action can be applied.. so it does depend on the amount of arrears. If he is soon to be made redundant - arrears will be suspended until he has another source of income - and then once this new income starts - the procedure will start again.. hope this makes sense!

 

2. Sorry to hear this about your son. With claiming DLA - an assessment cannot be made on this income - if your son has no other income this will be a nil assessment. If he claims another benefit - this will be £5 per week liability.. if he can prove he has shared care - the assessment will be reduced to nil per week.

The next part is a bit unclear.. you say they were maintenance direct - so the CSA calculated how much your son should pay? Then he just pays her directly?

If this is the case - it may be that the csa have recalculated how much needs to be paid - and not realised the case is maintenance direct -if this is the case - contact them and get them to confirm this with the other parent - once this is proven, he can get his monies refunded to him.

However, if the other parent has decided that she wants the csa to start to collect the money - they can just approach your son for this.. The CSA have to have been instructed by someone first.. I would need more specifics on that to help you there..

 

Hope the above helps..!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi Seanamarts!

 

1. First point - the employer can not deduct more than 40% of your daughters partners net income - you have 60% protected income - so if this has been breached then this is breaking the law and he should speak with his employer about the amount they are deducting.

With regards to being made redundant - the csa can only act when the change actually happens or if you can confirm a date when it will happen.. you need to tell them as soon as you know this - they can then start to recalculate.

With regards to the liabilty order/bailiff action - this is very unlikely as payments are being made, they have to follow legal procedures first - like issue warning letters for missing payments, if these payments have been made then they cant pursue.. they have to understand that there is only so much you can physically pay. However - if an agreement is in place to repay arrears - and this arrangement is not going to clear the arrears in 2years - legal action can be applied.. so it does depend on the amount of arrears. If he is soon to be made redundant - arrears will be suspended until he has another source of income - and then once this new income starts - the procedure will start again.. hope this makes sense!

 

2. Sorry to hear this about your son. With claiming DLA - an assessment cannot be made on this income - if your son has no other income this will be a nil assessment. If he claims another benefit - this will be £5 per week liability.. if he can prove he has shared care - the assessment will be reduced to nil per week.

The next part is a bit unclear.. you say they were maintenance direct - so the CSA calculated how much your son should pay? Then he just pays her directly?

If this is the case - it may be that the csa have recalculated how much needs to be paid - and not realised the case is maintenance direct -if this is the case - contact them and get them to confirm this with the other parent - once this is proven, he can get his monies refunded to him.

However, if the other parent has decided that she wants the csa to start to collect the money - they can just approach your son for this.. The CSA have to have been instructed by someone first.. I would need more specifics on that to help you there..

 

Hope the above helps..!

 

 

1. I agree with this, as said above CSA can only act at the time of change, so as soon as you are made redundant, inform the CSA via telephone/letter and always keep backups, as these are used as evidence, also if you think too much is being deducted out of your wages is it upto ur employee's only to deduct a maximum of 40% of net income. the payment schedule sent to your employer would be based on ur average net income at the time the child maintenance assessment was calculated, so if you think you have had a reduction in your salary, make sure you call the csa and send a letter aswell to ask for a new assessment to be made, and to speed the process up send 3/4 wage slips in with ur letter, this would enable a new assessment to be made.

 

 

2. Also i agree with the above, more info would be needed, when Parent with cares ring the agency for an assessment to be calculated, i know in my knowledge this has been misunderstood in the past, and a payment schedule has been automatically completed and sent out to the Non resident parent.

 

What I would say as a final note, if any of these blokes have a change in income details always always inform the CSA, because this would trigger in most cases a new assessment to be calculated.

 

Method of collection from a non resident parent would be as follows

 

Direct Debit/ Standing Order (This depends on the type of case, i know its only Standing order for clerical cases)

 

Voluntary Deduction from earnings order

 

Then if any of these are missed or not adhered to then a compulsory DEO would be put in place.

 

If this fails, debt/arrears can be sent to the enforcement team to gain a liability order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that f0xy, one thing though, they are threatening to take him to court and said the bailiffs will be sent in as he is not paying off his arrears quick enough, he has never faulted on a payment, now what I need to know is can they do this.

 

Also on the other end of the stick, my daughter cannot get help from the CSA despite the fact that she is on income support, the babies father just seem to have disappeared off the face of the world, he dosnt seem to be working or signing on, my daughter has given the CSA his NI number, countless addresses where he could be, his old work place, which she feels he is still working at, his phone number which is still in use, but the CSA still cannot contact him.. what can she do as the CSA seem to have thrown in the towel and no one seems to want to help her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seanamarts

 

F0xy well said!! What I would say with the bailiffs is that at some point arrears have built up on the case and this is usually from the beginning when the case is being set up. The arrears on the case have to clear within 2 years.. so if he can't pay the arrears off in those two years.. they will look to send it to enforcement for bailiff action.. eg..

 

£10k arrears

In 2 years he will pay £6k towards the arrears

The remaining £4k will be sent to enforcement for the bailiffs to collect or obtain a liability order.

 

If he is compliant with them though they may be willing to take the arrears over a longer period - he needs to make it clear that he is wanting to pay before it gets to this stage - but should they extend the length of time he has to clear them - as soon as a payment is missed they will not give him any more chances.. it takes a lot for the case to be sent to bailiffs in the first place - and it isnt usually a preferred method.. takes longer for them and its pretty complex stuff etc.

 

As for your daughter, aslong as the csa have been given all the information - your daughter has done her bit to be honest. There are lots of avenues for the csa then. They do advise 12-20weeks for completing work like this but if they are struggling to find him it can take longer. But no doubt when someone actually picks up her case and realises that they have everything there - im sure it will get moving. As long as the case is set up - at least the arrears are building on her case - and now she will be entitled to all of her child support money even though she is on income support - this will be good for her when the payments do start coming in.. Keep ringing them maybe and chase them to get the work done..

 

Hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I would say with the bailiffs is that at some point arrears have built up on the case and this is usually from the beginning when the case is being set up. The arrears on the case have to clear within 2 years.. so if he can't pay the arrears off in those two years.. they will look to send it to enforcement for bailiff action.. eg..
This is his ex's fault and a cock up with the CSA. He was paying her direct, with a sum she was happy with, she decided to disappear, where not only could he not see his daughter but was unable to pay her any child support, he contacted CSA and told them but they wouldnt do anything until she contacted them 3 years down the line, he did put some money away but not enough to pay the whole amount of the arrears off, because they wanted more than what he had agreed to pay her in the first place. Fair??

After 3 years he still owes £2000.00 or there abouts. Has sold his car, lives on very little as it is but they still want more or they are going to send in the bailiffs. We have that covered though ;) Now he is paying the right amount which is 40% of his wages plus a bit, and because the CSA wont pull their finger out of their backsides to help my daughter he is also helping support my daughter with my grandchild, he dosnt see his daughter because the selfish ex wont allow it. Fair? no not at all. He has been more than compliant with the CSA but they just seem to think they can get blood from a stone. He has never missed any payments. They have already sent a court letter stating they are going to take him to court if he does not pay more than he already is.

As for your daughter, aslong as the csa have been given all the information - your daughter has done her bit to be honest. There are lots of avenues for the csa then. They do advise 12-20weeks for completing work like this but if they are struggling to find him it can take longer. But no doubt when someone actually picks up her case and realises that they have everything there - im sure it will get moving. As long as the case is set up - at least the arrears are building on her case - and now she will be entitled to all of her child support money even though she is on income support - this will be good for her when the payments do start coming in.. Keep ringing them maybe and chase them to get the work done..

It has been over a year, in fact almost two years since my daughter first gave CSA the details, she phones them once a fortnight to try and get something done, but like I said the CSA just seems to have thrown in the towel. It just makes me so angry that on one hand theres someone who is paying more than enough to support his daughter but the CSA just want more, then on the other hand the CSA just dont seem to want to chase the people who really are not willing to pay. Can understand why I am so cross about this because its also coming out of my pocket, when my daughter cannot afford to pay bills and food etc because she isnt getting the support from the childs father. :) sorry to sound out at you but its getting a tad ridiculous now with CSA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...