Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice about what to do needed urgently


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4084 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I stumbled across this site and really hope someone can offer me some advice.

 

From the age of 18 credit was thrown in my face and at 28 I owe roughly 32,000 pound and decided in 2006 that I was getting into more debt trying to keep up repayments and simply stopped paying all of my creditors who are

 

Nat West - Loan - £16,000 which they say on statements £26,000 (I'm assuming interest)

 

Nat West Master Card - £1,600

 

Egg Card - £6,000

 

MBNA - £7,000

 

I have not responded to a single call, letter or knock on the door from any of the above or the subsequent debt collectors. and had not heard a word from any of them in 18 months.

 

I stupidly got a BT landline recently, years of having no credit has not bothered me at all but they did a credit check and bingo I obviously failed and had to pay a deposit up front and have now had letters from some of the above.

 

What should I do??

 

i have been reading that some may be uninforceable due to no CCA, would this be the case with any of the above companies?

 

Am I better contacting them and looking at settlement amounts?...... if so what would I be looking at paying each?

 

Help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

First send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12 working days from receipt, or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR). I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

Furthermore, with regards to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

You are reminded of the following under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

Trading Standards can bring about a prosecution if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under contract, he or she:

 

(a) harasses the other with demands for payment which by their frequency, or the manner or occasion of their making, or any accompanying threat or publicity are calculated to subject him or his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation;

(b) falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it;

© falsely represent themselves to be authorized in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment;

(d) utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character or purporting to have some official character which he knows it has not.

 

I am of the view that your harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Further to this if it is your intention to arrange a call from your 'Doorstep Collectors', I note that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Take note, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or any of your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless. Any trespassers you attempt to send therefore will be dealt with accordingly.Be further advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

(Print in red optional addition)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

 

(Print do not sign signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for this information. Do you think that it is possible that some of the compainies who haven't contacted me for 18 months may have written off the debt or is this just wishful thinking?

 

Do you think I should do a credit report to see whats on there before I write to all of my creditors?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the CCA request to each of them that contact you, because you applied for credit it has flagged your credit file & the chances are that all of your creditors will contact you eventually, particularly if you are at a different address.

 

Creditors very rarely 'write debts off', they sell them to DCAs and claim tax relief normally.

 

It would be wise to check your credit file to make sure there are no CCJs registered against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming Nat West will have CCA's for me as I sat and had load reviews and signed for larger loans with PPI. I'm relucatant to write to them at the moment as I have not had any contact with them for 4 years since I stopped making payments.

 

Before I contact them I would need to have money for some kind of settlement which I don't have, do you have any idea on 16,000 or £26,00, as they are now saying it is what sort of amount I would have to pay as a Full and final payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9.Fixed -sum annual statement

The CCA now requires creditors under a regulated fixed sum agreement (with a term of more than 12 months) to provide annual statements. This requirement is contained in a new section 77A of the CCA .Failure to comply with this section will mean that the debtor is not liable to pay interest or other default payments in respect of any period of non compliance when a statement is due, but has not been sent nor will the creditor be able to enforce the agreement during the period. This provision will apply to existing agreements as well as agreements made after commencement of this requirement.

 

If you have not recieved statements, at the very least you can challenge any interest & charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming Nat West will have CCA's for me as I sat and had load reviews and signed for larger loans with PPI. I'm relucatant to write to them at the moment as I have not had any contact with them for 4 years since I stopped making payments.
Wait for them to contact you, but if the orginal loan was for more than £25K it won't be covered by the CCA 1974.

 

You can reclaim the PPI and any unfair charges on these a/cs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a reply from the DCA for Egg (Calbot Financial) they have said

 

'we have requested the information under section 77 and/or 78 from original lender. Please be advised, we do not accept the statutory fee under section 77 and/or 78 of the consumer credit act 1974 and have returned the £1.00 fee sent.

 

we anticipare we will be able to provide the information within 12 days. In the event this is unlikely within the time limints we will write to you again.'

 

Is this normal for them to return the fee? what do I do if they don't respond in 12 days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it's normal for them to return the fee. If they don't produce the CCA within 12 working days of receiving your request you can put the a/c in dispute and legally withold payment; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a 2 page long letter back from them (I don't have a scanner or I will scan it in) The basically said they are sorry to receive my complaint? and told me the action they had taken ie. contacting egg to request the CCA. They then go on to quote definitions of enforcement and say I did sign a CCA with egg (which I don't honestly think I did) and so the debt would be enforecable at whatever point they obtain it and reasons why they can go to the CRA's with my details and CCJ. They have then given me the total balance I owe and suggested I contact them, they have also included a leaflet for the financial ombudsman should I wish to take it further and qoted different points from it. I don't have the letter to hand but if you need me to put more info on her I can tonight.

 

Should I respond? If so how?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens to the debt?

 

The debt still exists and they can still ask you for the money back. An unenforceable agreement simply means that they cannot enforce via the courts...providing the agreement was pre April 2007. Post that date, the court has an element of discretion.

 

Also, whilst there are a number of flaws with Egg agreements (pre and circa 2005 I believe, but don't hold me to that) it doesn't necessarily mean that Egg will concur with your view that the agreement is unenforceable and may commence proceedings regardless. They usually rely on the ignorance of the defendant and/or judge to obtain a CCJ in such circumstances.

 

Oh, and if you don't acknowledge the debt and/or make a payment over a 6 year period then the debt will become statute barred.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that info.

By writing to the DCA have I acknowledged the debt? (Its been about 4 years since I made any payments on any of my debts)

 

Do you think I should try to arrange a settlement free with the DCA for egg at this point? If so I owe them , £6,800 how much would I be looking at paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone answer this for me?

 

By writing to the DCA have I acknowledged the debt? (Its been about 4 years since I made any payments on any of my debts)

 

Do you think I should try to arrange a settlement free with the DCA for egg at this point? If so I owe them , £6,800 how much would I be looking at paying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends what you wrote in the letter, if you admitted the debt & they kept the letter then yes it would reset the SB clock.

 

Have they produced an enforceable agreement yet? If they haven't you don't need to make any settlement offer yet. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Since April I have not heard anything from the DCA for Egg or any of the other creditors. I have however decided that I want to wipe the slate clean so I can build up my credit rating so one day I can get a mortgage.

 

What would your recommend I offer as full and final settlement on the debts below

 

Egg - £5860 (No CCA but I would like to get the DCA off my back)

 

MBNA - £6801

 

NatWest Mastercard - £1105.25

 

NatWest Loan - £17,163.56 (with interest £28,263.80)

 

I have not had any contact with these companies since October 2006 but I can get my hands on some money and really would like to get rid of them once and for all so if anyone has made full and final settlements or could give me a rough idea of the % I should offer I would really appreciate it.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The chances are they have already defaulted your credit file within six months of you first became delinquent, these markers stay on your file for six years and then automatically drop off.

 

A debt becomes Statute Barred after six years (five in Scotland) if you have made no payment, written acknowledgement or if they have obtained a CCJ. After this period they cannot take any enforcement action.

 

Even if you offer a full and final settlement there is no guarantee that they will accept or even remove the defaults from your file, in fact you will more than likely awaken a sleeping tiger & you will be bombarded with demands for payment, they may even try to obtain a CCJ or even bankrupt you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...