Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have mow provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You sure it's a Section 48 notice? Section 48 notice is just telling you who your landlord is. Have they sold and they're just telling you who your new landlord is or is it an actual eviction notice? Might be best scanning it up just in case here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

frank galler - kubic investments ltd


princess5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4953 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 772
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Apparently if they haven't been liquidated you could prevent it through Companies house,

Spoke to Companies House and they said this firm have not yet gone into liquidation but are in the process of so doing. They told me to send them (CH) an e-mail with the circumstances of our dealings with this company and opposing the liquidation, which we did. Got an e-mail back saying that CH have blocked any liquidatin for 6 months so we can pursue the debt.

 

Didn't know you could do that. But the way is open for us to try and get the money back before they go into liquidation.

Edited by cerberusalert
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, the latest msg from companies house is below:

 

Dear Mr ....

 

Thank you for your email to this office, dated 15 April 2010, with reference to the above.

 

Please note, that as stated in my colleague, Mr Horsley's email of 3 March 2010, it is the policy of Companies Investigation Branch that, in order for the investigative process to be effective, it is essential to maintain confidentiality at all stages. We cannot enter into public debate on the merits of complaints, and we do not confirm or deny whether an investigation of a particular company is taking, or has taken place - this includes via correspondence with yourself, as the complainant.

 

I am sorry I cannot be of further assistance in this matter.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Richard Jeffers

Intelligence & Liaison Officer

 

 

The latest msg from ipswich police is:

 

....., sorry about the delay I've been away. Basically Kubic did carry out work as a claims management. Client files were sent to legal agencies who obtained affidavits from the clients and entered into correspondence with the lenders and some were referred to a solicitor. Some clients had there debts reduced or written off. Due to a change in the law it became more difficult to make debts unenforceable and due to the fact that lenders dragged their feet it did take months to sort out. When the complaints came in I spoke to the Ministry of Justice who regulate the industry because from the enquiries I had made and after consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service it was clear that the regulators should take this on as the burden of proof to obtain a criminal conviction is so high and it was clear that we would not reach that high standard.

I do appreciate that a lot of people have lost money and the only way forward for you all is to take out a joint action against Kubic.

Regards,

KJ

 

 

SO... we need to find out more information about a Joint action?

 

What is it?

Does it cost?

Rate of success?

Would we get money owed back?

 

Please can you all research this.. and write your findings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would need to take advice from a solicitor who is experienced in this type of action, google solicitors for joint action, I don't know any. You would need a number of you to agree this would cut costs as the more involved the less each has to pay. I don't know if this will work and unfortunately I cannot give legal advice.

Regards

KJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think someone needs to speak to a solicitor in a free consulation... briefly explain the case and see what they say..

 

if they they think we can recover the money... then see how much it would cost us each?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Looking at recent decisions by the Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal, I came across some interesting information that I thought I'd share:

 

On 2 February 2010, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal made an Order in respect of one Geoffrey Lloyd, against whom an allegation of dishonesty was proved, and he was also found liable for costs.

 

Geoffrey Lloyd was a solicitor's clerk, and a partner in a LLP called Swansea Legal Services which took over another solicitor's practice (PJ Williams).

 

What has all this to do with Tate-Lloyd, you may ask. Well, PJ Williams address was 53 Mansel Street, Swansea - the same as Tate-Lloyd!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Company Profile Report (CPR)

 

Commercial Debt Management

Company Name: TATE-LLOYD LEGAL SERVICES LLP

 

Print Report

 

 

Previous Name(s): NO PREVIOUS NAME HAS BEEN RECORDED DURING THE LAST 20 YEARS

 

Registered Number: OC343569

 

Registered Office: CORNER CHAMBERS

53 MANSEL STREET

SWANSEA

SA1 5TE

 

Incorporation Date: 24/02/2009

 

Country Of Origin: United Kingdom

Company Type: Limited Liability Partnership

 

Accounting Reference Date: 28/02

Last Accounts Made Up To:

Next Accounts Due: 24/11/2010

 

Last Annual Return:

Next Annual Return Due: 24/03/2010 (Overdue)

 

Company Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off

Type of Accounts: NO ACCOUNTS FILED Accounts

 

Nature Of Business: None Supplied

 

 

Filing History

 

 

04/05/2010 FIRST GAZETTE

20/04/2009 MEMBER RESIGNED GEOFFREY LLOYD

24/02/2009 INCORPORATION DOCUMENT

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

 

 

Mortgage Data

NONE

 

 

 

 

Report Generated 01/06/2010

©2007 Credit UK Ltd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Frank's gone to Florida - how are we going to get our money back, how are you going to bump into him / if the Ipswich Police and the fraud squad can't do anything waht can we do?

 

Has he got away with it, is he laughing whilst he buys the big house with the pool in the USA with our money!!!!!!

 

What good is this forum.

 

In a few months(weeks) is this thread going to die off alng with our money?

 

Any advice anyone please - can you track him down once he has left the UK?

Link to post
Share on other sites

this thread has died off.

 

if u paid him or the company by card, then u have to go through your bank within a certain amount of days.

 

other than that the only other way is a joint legal action against the company, but that could cost thousands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this thread has died off.

 

if u paid him or the company by card, then u have to go through your bank within a certain amount of days.

 

other than that the only other way is a joint legal action against the company, but that could cost thousands.

Hi again, I think joint legal action is the way forward. I have said this before, it would show how many people he has ripped off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To do any kind of legal action will cost more money - money i cannot afford to spend! What more can we say on the subject we have been ripped off by Frank Galler. Natasha Tate & Russell no longer accept calls they have a lady who continuously says they're busy, popped out etc so they have washed there hands of it. Unfortunately no one on the Tate Lloyd thread offered any advice or if they got there money back - i can only assume not.:mad:

Edited by Oreogal
Link to post
Share on other sites

To do any kind of legal action will cost more money - money i cannot afford to spend! What more can we say on the subject we have been ripped off by Frank Galler. Natasha Tate & Russell no longer accept calls they have a lady who continuously says they're busy, popped out etc so they have washed there hands of it. Unfortunately no one on the Tate Lloyd thread offered any advice or if they got there money back - i can only assume not.:mad:

Hi Oreogal, I understand how you feel, i understand how everyone feels. FLG has taken money from all of us , where has it gone, ? . we can only find out if we ALL get together, it will hurt but i do not beleive we should let it go. FLG has taken moneys from some people and done nothing, there is a case , but everyone needs to pull together. This can be done, this man has taken a lot of money from many people. Free advice is available and i would get it . but I need to see people here . They say nothing can be done, let a JUDGE have his say. FLG still beleives he has got away with this , he has not, TRUST me, he will end up in court thats if no one bumps him of first, I want him in court. PLEASE get everyone on here , and i promise i will go see a solicator. I want numbers. Regards dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

For all those people who are clearly looking for FRANK GALLER, He is currently residing in Spain in Fuente Alamo, Murcia. I was not able to locate a specific address but managed to trace him to that area, so if anybody is thinking of taking a little holiday any time soon you might want to pay him a visit? Sorry I cannot be of more help and looking at the last post this is a long time coming but tracking him down was not an easy task! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...