Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Despite past trends, US consumers are spending at record level. Economists are mystified – and grappling to forecast an end point.View the full article
    • Just go for the full value of the jacket. I haven't really followed the thread very well – was that the declared value. Maybe you can just give a very brief summary of how the puzzle over the value has happened. In terms of the video presentation, I'm pleased you enjoyed it – but I'm going to say now – the fact that we had to draw your attention to it means that you really haven't done much reading. You are coming across as extremely under confident. If you take a day or 2 to do some solid reading of the stories on the sub- forum then it will help you a great deal in your confidence and also in your approach to your forthcoming mediation. It's not a waste of time. This forum is about self empowerment. We try to direct you and we provide you with materials that we expect you to do your share of the work
    • Correct and its not your concern for the safety of a Bailiff..there have been recent developments in which Judgment of + £600 can now be transferred up to High Court for enforcement purposes. If the judgment obtained in the County Court is over £5000 and the claimant wishes to enforce this by way of execution against the debtor’s goods, then it must be transferred up to the High Court for enforcement. This will be undertaken by a High Court Enforcement Officer. An important development is that smaller claims (£600 and above) in the County Court, known as County Court Judgments (CCJs), are increasingly also being transferred up to the High Court for enforcement. This is owing to: a) The High Court Enforcement Officer greater powers. b) Unlike County Court Bailiffs, HCEOs also work within a private company and are paid on results – based on the amount that is collected.
    • Hahaha! That video really did put things into a funny perspective for me, brave of them to state their defence to a court too. Thank you for the laugh, really helped to lighten the weight I had been feeling from this situation   Any advice on the price of the jacket argument before I go to mediation? Like I said, I have full proof of the receipt and email entries 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

HFC (Endeavour) CENTRAL CAPITAL PPI time barred where to now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4215 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone I hope someone can help me.

 

In 2003 we took out a loan for £35k with PPI for £6650 making the total loan £41650 over 120 months secured against the house.

What we hadn't realised was that the PPi only lasted 5 years of the loan.

 

We tried to claim on it twice but that didn't pay out.

What we have come to realise was That we believe we were missold it.

We were told at the time (on the phone) was that we couldn't have the loan unless we took out the PPI.

It was a single premium.

 

What I really need to know is do we have a case?

The court gave an adjournment to an eviction of our house so that we could pursue avenues of finding the money to pay off arrears that are connected with this loan. We told him at the time that we are going to pursue the mis selling.

 

Also as we paid a single premium that was added to the loan, if it finished after 5 years is it likely that we are still paying interest on that or possibly still paying it!!

 

Sorry if this is long winded just wanted to get down all the details.

The loan is due to end 2013

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ssbjham,

 

Sorry I cannot be of any help but by bumping this thread maybe someone else with more knowledge than me will look in.

 

Bosun.

Please note: I have no formal qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can anyone help? We have a secured loan from Feb 2003 from EPF and we are in the process of claiming back PPI. We had a reply back today to our inital letter stating that we did in fact arrange the loan through CENTRAL CAPITAL W

who i guess are the brokers and we need to take up our complaint with them and that it has nothing to do with them CAN anyone tell me who utimately responsible I have found a letter from 2003 from independent finance with the same address as CENTRAL CAPITAl g uessing they are three same.com WHhat do we do now

e the same

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who sold you the PPI? The brokers? Go against them.

 

If they later try and pass the buck then go against both of them.

Don't use the FOS - rubbish.

 

Use the courts if necessary and don't be worried about suing them as joint defendants

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all can anyone help me i have sent off my first letter to central capital re PPI that was sold to us in feb 2003 for a secured loan.had their reply back today saying that the complaint is timed barred and that it also falls outside the jurisdiction of the FOS because the sale was conducted over a year prior to insurance regulation.com CAN anyone tell me what to do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe

 

jokers

 

quote the limitations act 32c at them.

 

its not time barred.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes section 32c.

Your right of action is that you only became aware of a cause of action now.

You mistakenly paid the PPI without being aware of what you know now.

The 6 year ruling begins from when you first discovered that you were mistaken.

 

 

 

Here;

http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1355378

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need help putting something together to respond-just ask here.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that this is your only thread for this ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I found so 3 threads merged.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Message for Martin3030

 

Hi, Are you able to help with the wording to a response to Central Capital following their letter to me that it is time barred ? I'm struggling a bit just how to word it so that it shows I 'm not going to be fobbed off:confused: or is there a template letter that I haven't found yet that I could use?

Thank you :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes ok there is no temp as such to address this,its usual to adapt one to suit.

I will sort one out for you this afternoon.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What now? I sent them my second letter quoting the Limitations Act and they have written back stating :- "The legal advice we have received our response has not changed and we would still deem your case to be time barred.

They then went on to quote the FOS website regarding time limits:

a) There are time limits for consumers to make a complaint - when is a complaint out of time?

Generally these time limits are

six months from your busines sending the consumer a final response and six years from the event the consumer is complaining about.

then goes on to say that I am complaining about an event more than six years ago.

Due to the time elapsed since the sale took mplace it is our opinion that the complaint is ime barred and therefore does not require a response.As the sale was conducted over a year prior to insurance regulation it will also fall outside the jurisdiction of the FOS.

Does anyone know what my next step should be? Please help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does fall out of the jurisdiction of the FOS, however you do have a claim in your own right as the limitations act only comes into play when you discovered you had been missold.

 

They are clearly not listening to your letters as they feel they have won, I would send a "LETTER BEFORE ACTION" (lba) .

 

If you want to do this let us know and we can help you write one but you need yo read up on this forum for the process of what you are doing. take them to court for the PPI back plus interest plus stat interest.

 

Can you post up your orriginal letter please and dates you sent letters.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they can cite the FOS Handbook.

You are citing Statute law-which has much more bite and teeth than the FOS-the difference between the FOS and the Courts is that you are VERY likely to get a result from the Court providing you do your homework-the FOS on the other hand are a waste of space.

You are unlikely to see a result on this score no matter HOW MUCH homework you do !!

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help with LETTER BEFORE ACTION would be appreciated, thank you. I'm posting the two letters thatI have been sent as requested. I have taken out all personal details.

5th February 2010

Dear Sir/Madam,

Account number :

We purchased the above policy from you in February 2003 but now believe that we were mis-sold the Payment Protection Insurance for the following reasons:

  • We were not given the correct information when the policy was sold to us.

  • We were not aware that this was a single premium policy that was to be added to the loan on drawdown and that it would accrue interest for the life of the loan.

  • Your salesperson did not give us full information on what the policy would and would not cover, for example that the loan only covered the first five years of our loan term.

  • The terms and conditions were not fully explained to us.

  • Yours salesperson did not tell us the policy was optional.

  • We were not asked whether we had any other insurance which would cover the loan.

  • We were not told that we could buy Payment Protection Insurance elsewhere to cover the loan.

It has come to our notice that HFC (of which Endeavour Personal Finance is a subsidiary) have been fined by the FSA for failing to treat their customers fairly when selling Payment Protection Insurance and we do not believe that our policy was sold in our best interests.

Unless you can satisfactorily justify to us that the policy was fair and reasonable we are requesting a full refund of all premiums and subsequent interest on these payments that we

have paid to date. As we believe we have been deprived of this money. We also expect 8% statutory interest the amount a court would award, to be added to each payment made.

We look forward to a full and prompt response to this letter and for the matter to be concluded within six weeks or we shall be contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate our complaint.

Yours faihfully

2nd letter when refused.:

08/03/2010

Account number :

We are writing in response to your letter dated 24/02/2010 with regards to the insurance sold with our loan.

In response to your statement that our complaint is time barred , we must draw your attention to the Limitations Act 32c

Our right of action is as follows:

1) We only became aware that there was a course of action open to us recently.

2) We took out PPI without having the Key Facts explained to us.

3) The six year ruling begins from when we first discovered the PPI was sold to us in error ,not from the date it was sold to us. Therefore this claim is NOT time “barred”.

We do not feel you have offered a satisfactory answer to our claim and we request that you re-visit the complaint bearing in mind the information above.

If we do not receive a letter addressing the above concerns in the next fourteen days, we shall have no hesitation in taking the matter further.

Yours faithfully,

We are writing in response to your letter dated 24/02/2010 with regards to the insurance sold with our loan.

In response to your statement that our complaint is time barred , we must draw your attention to the Limitations Act 32c

Our right of action is as follows:

1) We only became aware that there was a course of action open to us recently.

2) We took out PPI without having the Key Facts explained to us.

3) The six year ruling begins from when we first discovered the PPI was sold to us in error ,not from the date it was sold to us. Therefore this claim is NOT time “barred”.

We do not feel you have offered a satisfactory answer to our claim and we request that you re-visit the complaint bearing in mind the information above.

If we do not receive a letter addressing the above concerns in the next fourteen days, we shall have no hesitation in taking the matter further.

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help with LETTER BEFORE ACTION would be appreciated, thank you.

 

I'm posting the two letters that I have been sent as requested.

I have taken out all personal details.

 

5th February 2010

Dear Sir/Madam,

Account number :

We purchased the above policy from you in February 2003 but now believe that we were mis-sold the Payment Protection Insurance for the following reasons:

 

  • We were not given the correct information when the policy was sold to us.

 

  • We were not aware that this was a single premium policy that was to be added to the loan on drawdown and that it would accrue interest for the life of the loan.

 

  • Your salesperson did not give us full information on what the policy would and would not cover, for example that the loan only covered the first five years of our loan term.

 

  • The terms and conditions were not fully explained to us.

 

  • Yours salesperson did not tell us the policy was optional.

 

  • We were not asked whether we had any other insurance which would cover the loan.

 

  • We were not told that we could buy Payment Protection Insurance elsewhere to cover the loan.

It has come to our notice that HFC (of which Endeavour Personal Finance is a subsidiary) have been fined by the FSA for failing to treat their customers fairly when selling Payment Protection Insurance and we do not believe that our policy was sold in our best interests.

 

We demand a full refund of all premiums and subsequent interest on these payments that we have paid to date. We have been deprived of this money & also demand 8% statutory interest, the amount a court would award, to be added to each payment from the date it was made to the date of this letter.

 

We look forward to a full and prompt response to this letter and for the matter to be concluded within eight weeks or we shall be contacting the Financial Ombudsman to investigate our complaint.

 

Yours faithfully

 

2nd letter when refused.: 8/03/2010

Account number :

 

We are writing in response to your letter dated 24/02/2010 with regards to the insurance sold with our loan.

In response to your statement that our complaint is time barred , we must draw your attention to the Limitations Act 32c

 

Our right of action is as follows:

1) We only became aware that there was a course of action open to us recently.

2) We took out PPI without having the Key Facts explained to us.

3) The six year ruling begins from when we first discovered the PPI was sold to us in error ,not from the date it was sold to us. Therefore this claim is NOT time “barred”.

 

You have not offered a satisfactory answer to our claim and we demand that you re-visit the complaint upon the information above.

If we do not receive a letter addressing the above concerns in the next fourteen days, we shall have no hesitation in taking the matter further.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

We are writing in response to your letter dated 24/02/2010 with regards to the insurance sold with our loan.

In response to your statement that our complaint is time barred , we must draw your attention to the Limitations Act 32c

 

Our right of action is as follows:

1) We only became aware that there was a course of action open to us recently.

2) We took out PPI without having te Key Facts explained to us.

3) The six year ruling begins from when we first discovered the PPI was sold to us in error ,not from the date it was sold to us. Therefore this claim is NOT time “barred”.

 

You have not offered a satisfactory answer to our claim and we demand that you re-visit the complaint upon the information above.

If we do not receive a letter addressing the above concerns in the next fourteen days, we shall have no hesitation in taking the matter further.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a letter before action

its a demand to refund PPI.

 

the bits in red are ammendments that i think you should make.

just copy and paste each letter into word and print it.

and send them recorded post

the red bits do not need to be in red.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to HFC (Endeavour) CENTRAL CAPITAL PPI time barred where to now?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...