Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Virgin Active + ARC + Trevor Munn Solicitors


Misty18
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4801 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been reading alot of the same problems im having with gym memberships.

 

I have just received a letter from Trevor Munn Solicitors saying they are taking me to court which im happy with coz im not paying them, but just wondered has ayone been taken to court by these people and what was the results?

 

Many thanks for any info!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi.

 

I've had dealings with Trevor Munn threatening court action. If you read the letter they sent carefully, it won't actually say they're taking you to court, it'll say something along the lines of they 'are preparing papers for submission to Northhampton County Court.'

 

I had a problem with David lloyd leisure, ARC (A real shower of ****s) and dodgy Trevor Munn.

 

I'll bet a pound to a bucket of slurry they won't take you to court, you don't say how much it's for, but generally, they bank on the threats, if they don't work then they either go away or sell it to a more local debt management firm.

 

A tip for you. In that letter, it says they'll take you to (I think) North or Southampton County Court. I live up in Scotland, so in line with Prorugation of jurisdiction, they need to take me to court where I live. That makes it much more expensive for them to continue.

 

Also, and I realise this may not work for you if you live in England. On the contract it says all disputes will be dealt with under English law. If you don't live in England that infringes your statutory rights. Perhaps you do though so not so useful.

 

Assuming you don't live in the county where they're threatening to sue you, let them get on with it (it'll be an empty threat.) However if they do, you can write to the court and have it thrown out as being incompetent under P of J. (paragraph 3(4) of schedule 8 to the Civil Jurisdiction & Judgments Act 1982. Paragraph 3.)

 

They were on sticky ground with me anyway as I'd offered to settle in full in writing but they still denied me access to the club and refused to accept payment, they basically nullified their own contract.

 

That P of J law is handy as it may make it financially unviable for a company to chase you for money.

 

If you want any help you can get in touch, I still have my file at home.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply :)

 

My partner owes about £200.00 so they say.

 

I have received a letter from ARC saying i havent given them a good enough defence and will pass it onto Trevor Munn.

 

I have replyed saying basically that they obviously havent seen the paperwork i sent to Virgin in the beginning.

 

I originally sent Virgin a cheque in full and final settlement of my account and they banked it. They then wrote to me saying that he was in arrers and dont accept it and want the rest of the money. But really they should of sent the cheque back to me saying they dont accept it and then carried on and then take me to court.

 

Trevor Munn have also just written to me saying that they are preparing the paperwork, and explaining the cost i will be charged for going to court but have only just sent both letters yesterday so i will see what happens now!

 

I am getting help from my manger at work - but just worried if my partner goes to court and is in the wrong what would happen as he is unemployed as well so cant pay them anyway!

 

Thanks for any more help or advise given.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

ARC deliberately don't communicate with the gym, I tried explaining to them I'd offered in writing to make payment in full but the gym had declined, ARC still came after the money.

 

This is what will happen:

 

Trevor Munn will send that letter saying paper work is being prepared for court etc etc etc. (The is an empty threat. Also, they'll want to take you to court in North/Southampton, if you don't like there they can't. Prorugation of Jurisdiction dictates that they must lodge papers in a court local to you. Not that they will anyway.)

 

If you don't agree to pay what they're asking (which you absolutely shouldn't) You will then get a letter from a company called ScotCall threatening a visit from a door step collection representative. If this person exists at all, he/she has no legal powers. Only after it has gone to court is there any real legal power involved. (And remember, they're threatening action in a court that has no jurisdiction over you...)

 

On your partner not being able to pay. Even if it did go to court (and it absolutely won't for 200 quid) payment is based on ability to pay. The court will ask for income and outgoings then make a calculation on that.

 

But listen. Don't worry about it. Just keep all your paper work in any case. Don't have any communication that isn't in writing and don't talk to anyone on the doorstep, they have no power and are only there to intimidate you, if anyone turns up at all.

 

Now I make a sport of goading these people. Once you realise they have no power, you realise there isn't anything these cretins can do other than moan on the phone.

 

For me, the last I heard was from ScotCall threatening a doorstep collection. When I opened the letter, I laughed and stuck it my folder just in case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest Old_andrew2018

hi lee88f,

I saw the letter in the link and would argue that the ref no would identify you to Trevor Munn

Link to post
Share on other sites

That I do not mind about. I am not intimidated in the slightest about them. Like ive told them if they really think I owe money, I have told them to issue a claim form to the court and we can let a District Judge Decide if I owe Virgin any money and like I told them if I defend the claim and Win, I will plaster it all over the internet that I won! Because basically I believe I do not owe Virgin a Penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi guys, thanks for all the reassurance.

I too have been dealing with Virgin Active and have just now been passed on to Trevor Munn.

Are there any more follow ups on what happened to the alleged debt?

Edited by slick132
Defamatory remark removed - please see Site Rules about posting, thanks.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cairo and welcome to CAG

 

I have amended your post slightly to avoid defamatory language, which our site cannot carry. Please see our Site Rules about posting.

 

Also, please feel free to start your own thread here in the Gyms forum so you can discuss your case and seek advice if you want any.

 

You'll learn plenty by reading other threads here.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...