Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax And Blair Oliver Scott


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Sirs

 

I was rather surprised to receive your letter dated (DATE).

 

I was given the impression from your letter dated April 2010, that you were at last taking my complaint seriously and investigating the dispute I have with Halifax Bank of Scotland.

 

Apparently I was mistaken and you had no intention of investigating my dispute.

 

As you are invoking the Practice Directions and Pre action Conduct Rules and have advised the documents you intend to rely on. Perhaps you would be so good as to provide me with copies of those documents mentioned, namely :

 

Copy agreement

Default Notice information

Statements.

 

As you are well aware, I have been requesting copies of this information for quite a while now, with no response.

 

I look forward to hearing from you regarding this matter.

 

Yours etc..

Hi CitB

Thanks for letter1 will send them that :D It is mazing they write me a letter offering to look into my issues and then dont! iif they had agreed to countinue sending me regular statements detaling any payments made so i can see progress being made and that no other charges being applied i would have been happy to keep up with affordable regular payments to reduce my debt but was not happy to see them going down a big Halifax hole!:mad:

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Folks

I Will send Cit B letter,However as i see Halifax seem to have at last taken of the small payment i made to them back in March as balance seems to have reduced very slightly by the small payment i made back in March I was thinking of making another monthly payment to them to cover Julys payment and then inform them that when they have acknowledged Julys payment and agreed that they will send regular statements showing other payments that go in so i can see balance going down and can see progress being made and that no other charges being applied i will pay installments for April May and June and agree a new reasonable affordable montkly repayment plan with them .As I do think it is important to be seen as being reasonable and to be attempting to reduce and edventually clear my debt with Halifax so that if they still insist in draging it all into court Judge will see i am attempting to reduce debt ,I do realise though that notifying me and acknowledging any payments i madw via pre litigation letter and threatograms not an acceptable way of acknowledging payments :rolleyes: and will poinrt that out to them!

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

working on another letter!

Edited by sunflower99

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CitB and anybody else interested in this thread,

I am thinking of sending a letter along these lines ,I have included citB excellant letter but just wanted to include a proposed payment plan to give Halifax a final chance to be reasonable and to show any Judge should this proceed to liigation stage that i am willing to try and reach an agreement with Halifax,Also think it important to raise any issues i have with the cca they sent me to futrhter show there is a dispute on account and though it is signed and apparently contains all the prescribed terms on signature page it the point can be raised and defended on that cca is not very legible as i need to defend on any issue i can dredge up to try to stop them attempting to do any damage to me and my OH .so I think it important to try to get them to give me everything they have on me and my Halifax credit card account as ii notice that some caggers who received this pre litigation letter do have halifax issue court papers and need to be fully prepared in case i am one of the people the do decide to progress to litigation stage and i need to put up a good fight!

Edited by sunflower99

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan0038-3.jpg?t=1269291244

Would people agree on this thread that i could argue this cca not easily legible as a defence?

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent my letter of now pointing out that i amsurprised they sending me a pre litigation letter when thr last i head from them they were investigating th points i made mainly the fact that they did not acknowledge letter i made offering a payment plan and that they did not acknopwledr first payment i made or take it of in balance when Barmy orrible and stupid sent me a folow up lettter threatening litigation in spite of my letetr offering a payment plan to them:mad: I have also made a payment to cover the amount i promised to pay them over last 3 months now balance showing a slightly reduced amount in latest pre litigation letter! and offering another payment plan.So waiting to see what happens now!

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do procced to court .I am hoping to defend on basis of irreponsible lending and point out in defence the following

 

1) They pressurissed me on phone when i was applying for a mortgage payment holiday to apply for their credit card and told me i had been approvd for one even though i informed them i had been turned down online for an application for a credit card sponsered by their bank recently. Also at time i had four other credit cards with large balances on it. Also had two secured loans with halifax and large overdraft with another bank on a joint bank account.

(2)They kept increasing my credit limit without asking me every time i reached or nearly reached my credit limit.Also again i was servicing large balances on 4 other credit cards and also had two secured loans with Halifax including a mortgage of £------ and a second secured loan of £------ .I also had a huge overdraft of £----- on a joint------ bank account held with my husband when they increased my credit limit,

(3) I also feel they had failed to take into account our household income both when they advanced me the card and also when they increased my credit limit,I am on a low ----- wage and was only earning approx £----- a year when they kept increasing my limit and when they offered me card back in 2005 my stated earnings would have been less than that,Also at time card offered and credit limits increased my husband unable to work and still is not working due to heart problem and only receivis incpacity benefit.Also I feel

Credit checks would also revealed that i was servicing huge balances on other credit cards and overdrafts plus the secured loans i had with their bank!

(4) I was only making minimum repayments most months ,So they could see i was struggling and getting more indebted to them

So i hope the above points are valid points to make in any defence or time oder application if i loose,

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan0032.jpg?t=1269380898

I have so far found two letters like this showing credit limit been iincreased automatically with out asking me by halifax

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

so can show my credit limit increasedd when i not requested it when i already had huge balances on other credit cards and low household income income ,Which is a criterai quoted by claims managmenet companies for iresponsible lending

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...