Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to unravel this – but I get the impression that there was no contract between you and EVRi and that you didn't even choose them but instead you decided use some third party parcel broker in the USA which organised the delivery. Is this correct? EVRi came into the picture because they would then eventually selected for part of the journey although you had no knowledge that it might be them and I suppose it didn't really matter as long as the item got to you. Secondly, I really don't understand the journey which this item made. You bought the item from somebody in the USA. They then were meant to dispatch it to you to another address in the USA but for some reason or other it came to the UK and then into the hands of EVRi at which point it was lost or stolen. More confusion here because you now tell us that EVRi marked it as being out for delivery but it was never delivered. This suggests that it was going to be delivered to a UK address but earlier on you said that it was going to be delivered to USA address. I think you need to look at the story. Maybe show it to a friend of yours who is not particularly where the details and ask them if they can make head or tail of it and then come back to us with clarification so that we fully understand. Also, I think we'd like to know what the item is, how was it declared, what was the value which was declared. You said it was a valuable item because it was rare and collectable. I gather from this that it is non-fungible. We need to understand more about this. Was an insurance policy purchased to cover it during the delivery process. I understand that this rare and collectable item be valued at £200. Have evidence this value. This could become very important. Also you have given is no idea when this happened. We need to understand the full timescale. There are a number of possibilities here including the possibility of the contract action against EVRi on the basis of your third party rights or an action for negligence but we need to know far more and we need to get a story that makes sense.   Finally, I understand that you have sent the letter of claim. What did it say? How much time did you give them? What did you expect to happen as a result of the letter of claim? Whatever the answers to those questions might be, clearly you had no idea how to proceed after having sent such a letter. A letter of claim is meant to be a serious threat of some legal action if some condition which you have stipulated is not complied with. You set a deadline for compliance and at the end of that deadline you issue the court action. Clearly you are not in a position to do that so your letter of claim is a bluff and undermines your credibility and it will find its way into the EVRi wastepaper basket – if it's not there already.  
    • Good morning. I just wanted to check something please. The other side have moved slightly and negotiated a full and final offer price to end this matter. I am happy with this. However, I want to make sure this is the end of the matter and am emailing the following over to them prior to payment. Is this enough to ensure they can come back for nothing else? Thanks -------------------------------------------------- Dear Sir.   With regards your last email below.   I am pleased to agree to the full and final settlement figure given below.   Can you confirm this payment will be in full and final payment with no further claim to be brought against me in this matter?   Best regards
    • 100% sure I didn't receive it, that why my first post is with the £100 letter.
    • Engine, the technology business Starling Bank was built on, has been busy launching banks around the world, from Romania to Australia.View the full article
    • use this your WS and inc this as an exhibit off to bed now 3 nights been up till 4am aurora watching wont be on too early as it's lambing season out herding with the dog. your WS main thrust is the debt would now be SB'd , the DN was filed xxxyrs+months after it should have been thus unlawfully extending  SB date to infinity. highlight their admittance regarding errors at that time period in your 'redetermination'  paragraph. agreements unreadable. would have already been written off due to SLC age write off criteria has they not issued the claim to stop the SB clock when they had no paperwork to prove their case in the 1st place. never earned over threshold. dx       Erudio - stopped sending email deferments won at FOS DRN-4141462.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lay Off Regulations


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all,

 

This is my first post on the forum, and i'd like some advice please.

 

I have recently been laid of from work (due to a shortage of work) and have good reason to believe that there is work for me in my factory, but it is currently being done by a manager & foreman rather than me. Please could someone tell me if this is legal, or are my employers breaking the law in some way?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Two questions:

 

a) As a direct result of this 'lay-off', has there been an impact on your wages?

 

b) Could you expand on your beliefs regarding the existence of work and it being done by a manager and foreman?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Two questions:

 

a) As a direct result of this 'lay-off', has there been an impact on your wages?

 

b) Could you expand on your beliefs regarding the existence of work and it being done by a manager and foreman?

 

a) Yes, very much so. I recieved 'lay off' pay of 20 pounds per day, for the first five days, then nothing (i'm currently onto my eighth day layed off).

 

b) A friend of mine delivers materials, which i normally work with, to my place of work, He has delivered three times since my lay off..

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a) Check if there is any provision in your Statement of Particulars of Employment about lay-offs and how they are administered.

 

b) If there is no provision as per lay-offs, and you can demonstrate that your work is being done by other employees, then you can raise a grievance stating the fact...

 

There are certain special circumstances where the failure to provide work may result in the breach of a legal duty if the duty to provide work leads to a reduction in the employee's potential earnings... thus you are entitled to be given an opportunity to earn your 'wage'...

 

Have any of your other colleagues been laid-off?

Edited by Bigredbus
Addendum

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a) Check if there is any provision in your Statement of Particulars of Employment about lay-offs and how they are administered.

 

b) If there is no provision as per lay-offs, and you can demonstrate that your work is being done by other employees, then you can raise a grievance stating the fact...

 

There is certain special circumstances where the failure to provide work may result in the breach of a legal duty if the duty to provide work leads to a reduction in the employee's potential earnings... thus you are entitled to be given an opportunity to earn your 'wage'...

 

Many thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have any of your other colleagues been layed-off?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have any of your other colleagues been layed-off?

 

Hi, Yes.

 

All departments are currently laid off, it's my job to supply these other areas with work (once 'my bit' is done), but like i've said, it appears 'my bit' is being done by others, ie manager/foreman.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollysdad,

I quote from Selwyns law of Employment.

 

If the lay-off or short-timr has lasted more than four consecutive weeks,or more than 6 weeks in any period of 13 weeks; then the employee may give written notice ( not more than four weeks after the lay-off or short-time has finished) that he/she intends to claima redundancy payment. He/she must then give the requisite notice to terminate his/her contract, and will be entitles to be considered redundant. The employer may agree to meet the claim, or refuse to do so and may serve a counter notice within 7 days; on the grounds that he reasonably expects to be able to provide at least 13 weeks continuous employment, without further resort to lay-offs or short-time working. If the claim or counter notice are not withdrawn, the matter will be determined by an employment tribunal, which will consider whether or not there was a reasonable prospect of full employment for 13 weeks. If the counter notice is withfrawn by the employer, or the 13 weeks continuous employment fails to materialise, the employee is entitled to be paid reduundancy money. - End of quote.

 

PLEASE do not forget that whilst on short-time working or lay-off , you can claim jobseekers allowance. Ring them today, 08000 55 66 88. It will however depend on whther your partner (if u have 1) is working full-time or not. You need to claim income based JSA.

 

Cheers - Scousegeezer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Did you find any provision or policy in your SoP of Employment, or 'Staff Handbook' covering 'lay-offs'?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Did you find any provision or policy in your SoP of Employment, or 'Staff Handbook' covering 'lay-offs'?

 

No, sorry, i'm unable to find the book at present - however, there is a copy at work (which i cant get my hands on until my return)

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollysdad,

I quote from Selwyns law of Employment.

 

If the lay-off or short-timr has lasted more than four consecutive weeks,or more than 6 weeks in any period of 13 weeks; then the employee may give written notice ( not more than four weeks after the lay-off or short-time has finished) that he/she intends to claima redundancy payment. He/she must then give the requisite notice to terminate his/her contract, and will be entitles to be considered redundant. The employer may agree to meet the claim, or refuse to do so and may serve a counter notice within 7 days; on the grounds that he reasonably expects to be able to provide at least 13 weeks continuous employment, without further resort to lay-offs or short-time working. If the claim or counter notice are not withdrawn, the matter will be determined by an employment tribunal, which will consider whether or not there was a reasonable prospect of full employment for 13 weeks. If the counter notice is withfrawn by the employer, or the 13 weeks continuous employment fails to materialise, the employee is entitled to be paid reduundancy money. - End of quote.

 

PLEASE do not forget that whilst on short-time working or lay-off , you can claim jobseekers allowance. Ring them today, 08000 55 66 88. It will however depend on whther your partner (if u have 1) is working full-time or not. You need to claim income based JSA.

 

Cheers - Scousegeezer.

 

Many thanks, Scousegeezer... I was hoping not to need to claim anything - but that's looking like a real possibility now..

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...