Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please advise me - CABOT/MORGANS....


adebo119
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello; I am hoping I can get some good advice from you good people out there. In 2003, I took out a loan from Egg for £20000. I also took out insurance for the loan for £4450. I was paying back £457 a month every month until middle of 2005, when I had to stop working(I was a contractor) due to complications with my pregnancy. I called up the insurance people (can’t remember, but think it was in-house with egg), and explained that I was unable to keep making payments, but was told that unless I declared myself bankrupt, they were unable to help!

Last year, Cabot wrote me, stating that they had been assigned the debt, which, according to them, stood at over £16k. Unfortunately, I have lost all the paperwork (I moved houses after getting the loan), but I am surprised that I am still owing as much as £16K :eek:. Anyway, I ignored them all last year, never admitting to the debt (not sure if this was wise :(), and then in January, I got a letter from Morgans solicitors saying I needed to call, or else.... Interestingly, out of the blue, Egg wrote me in January too with a letter titled ‘Loan Account Statement’, and their outstanding figure for me was exactly £1000 more than what Cabot say I owe... hmmm...

Yesterday morning, I received a letter from Northampton court asking me to admit or defend the claim from Morgans solicitors. How do I proceed from here? To be honest, I am not in a position right now to make any payments... I am DESPERATELY looking for work left right and centre, and this is just an additional stress I could do without. Is it too late to ask for a CCA? (yes, I have been reading through this beautiful website!) What if they do have the CCA, do I just admit the claim? Can i ask for the court to be closer to where I live? If I do get a CCJ against me, could they still send bailiffs round?

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Thanks so much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My initial thought is that you had taken out payment protection and when you tried to claim they seem to have said 'no'...seems it was obviously missold !! It is was indeed as much use as a chocolate fireguard then it brings the whole agreement into question. - Customer’s debt wiped after MBNA PPI cock-up | BitterWallet What are the particulars of the claim on the claim form ? (don't be too specific with the fine details though) - and do have a read here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/241827-legal-action-how-start.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man,

 

The particulars of the claim read:

"The claimant is the assignee of a debt from Egg Banking plc loan ref XXX. Notice of assignment having been given to the defendant in writing. Despite demand for payment, £16xxx.xx reamins due. The claimant claims £16xxx.xx and interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 and costs".

 

I have to respond to the claim very shortly; is it too late to ask for a CCA? I have lost the paperwork for the original loan :Cry:

 

Thanks so much for your help. Very grateful

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it might be a good idea to CPR31.14 in relation to the deed and the notice of assignment. But this will only cover what is mentioned in the claim, I think a CPR18 with it might be a good idea too - (send all recorded)... - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html and this is the CPR18 - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/148845-bryan-carter-received-summons.html#post1573418 Any PPI on it at all ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, 42man. Yes there was PPI on it, but when I called up and told them about my situation and being unable to pay anymore, they said unless I declared myself bankrupt, there was nothing they could do. As a matter of fact, i don't even remember getting a letter of default from egg.

 

I will look at the links you have sent me. Thanks so much, God bless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After being summoned to court, I wrote to Morgans solicitors (cabot in-house solicitors) asking them to provide me with a: a copy of the agreement between myself and Egg, as this was not attached to the particulars of claim and b: the notice of assignment.

 

I also asked wrote to ask for: ‘A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold’ (CPR 1:cool:

 

They responded that they have made requests for a copy of the credit agreement and default notice together with copies of T’s & C’s prevailing at the time of opening the account, and that this would be provided to me (no time frame was mentioned).

 

They also said they are unaware that they must provide an enforcement notice, and requested that I show them the relevant provision in the CCA.

 

The NOA they sent me was a one-paragraph letter supposedly from Egg. Nothing in all the documents they sent me has my signaturelink3.gif on it.

 

I had taken out a PPI with this loan, and when I had to stop working due to complications in my pregnancy, I called up and was told that unless I declared myself bankrupt, there was nothing they could do! I don’t recall getting a default letter (though, possibly I did).

 

Is this debt enforceable? Is it true that they don’t have to provide an enforcement notice? Do we still have to go to court when they have not yet provided a credit agreement? What do I do next?

 

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done a cpr 31 and 18 to Morgans. They replied - to the wrong address :shock:. The postman recognised my name and brought it to my door - and included a log of all calls made to my number and lots of blacked out pages which are supposed to be the sale agreement of the loan. They also included a 'NOA' supposedly from egg, which I doubt, as the font is not the same as egg, but rather the same as cabots! They have not sent me a signed copy of the agreement, but said they would when they could get it.

 

I am tempted to say to the court that they have ignored my requests, as they sent it to the wrong address :wink:, but i just feel this may drag on unnecessarily. I have to put in my defence by tomorrow - shall I just admit that I owe the money but am disputing the amount (which I am - just looked at my bank statements and I think i am owing just over half of what they claim) and offer to make a token payment each month, as I am not working?

 

If I do this, will judgement not be entered against me anyway? I so don't want to go to court, and would LOVE a strikeout, but am assuming that they won't strikeout simply because there is no signed CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, going through the same thing with the same people right now....Good luck.

 

Just reading up on stuff now, seems daunting but think we will all get there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, today i need to send in my defence to the courts. I wrote to morgans sols asking for a signed copy of my agreement with the OC, which was due over a week ago. All they sent me was a supposed copy of the NOA from OC, and said when they got it, they would send it to me.

 

Can I ask the court to strike this case out, or is it too early? My defence was going to be no NOA from OC, no DN, and no termination of account. At first I was partially admitting the claim, but disputing the amount, and offering to make a token payment monthly.

 

What do you guys suggest?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re our PPI - were you self employed or a shareholder/director of a company? Bankruptcy is usually only a provision in such a case.

 

In which case, as a company director or self-employed person, you should not have been sold a PPI policy like that in the first place. Do you know how much you paid in premiums and interest? It may well wipe out any alleged debt and leave them owing you money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

You have some advice on your other thread with regard to acquiring the paperwork you need, IMHO it is early to ask for a strike out, When did you send the CPR requests.

Have you considered sending an Embarrassed Defence, this link will show an example

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/245171-mbna-optima-legal-court-3.html#post2788009

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Old Andrew 2007. I sent the cpr requests in Feb, and a reminder last week.

 

Yes, after thinking about it, I agree it's too early to ask for a strikeout :). I'll look at this link - anything to help, as all of this is totally new to me.

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update - Morgan sols have now sent me a letter 'pursuant to CPR r.18', requesting that I provide them with a copy of the PPI policy I had with Egg; a copy of the t's & C's realting to the PPI policy; a copy of the claim I made in accordance with the PPI policy; and a copy of the communications I had between myself and Egg in respect of my claim (they want a response in 28 days).

 

I don't have ANY of the above documents... are they actually allowed to ask for these docs? And to what purpose? Any idea how I should reply them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - Morgan sols have now sent me a letter 'pursuant to CPR r.18', requesting that I provide them with a copy of the PPI policy I had with Egg; a copy of the t's & C's realting to the PPI policy; a copy of the claim I made in accordance with the PPI policy; and a copy of the communications I had between myself and Egg in respect of my claim (they want a response in 28 days).

 

I don't have ANY of the above documents... are they actually allowed to ask for these docs? And to what purpose? Any idea how I should reply them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Its them that have to supply YOU with the proof,

If you havent got these documents, then thats all you can say.

Are you absolutely sure you havent got the PPI stuff.

If they failed to send you requested documents, which theyve stated in their claim, then the only defence you can file is an embarrassed one.

You were also a contractor, So I assume you were self employed, so that would mean the PPI was useless and definitely missold to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - Morgan sols have now sent me a letter 'pursuant to CPR r.18', requesting that I provide them with a copy of the PPI policy I had with Egg; a copy of the t's & C's realting to the PPI policy; a copy of the claim I made in accordance with the PPI policy; and a copy of the communications I had between myself and Egg in respect of my claim (they want a response in 28 days).

 

I don't have ANY of the above documents... are they actually allowed to ask for these docs? And to what purpose? Any idea how I should reply them?

 

Adebo , please try to stick to one thread, you'll lose people

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Bazaar. I will stick to this thread :). I moved after I had gotten the loan, and I was pregnant and ill, so I lost all the paperwork amongst other things :(.

 

However, I saw on moneysavingexpert.com a template that I could use to ask for details of the PPI I was sold, so I am thinking of writing to Egg to ask for the paperwork. I am thinking along the same lines as you, that they should provide me with paperwork, not the other way round..... They have now sent me a 'signed copy of the agreement' (a week late), but the figures on the statement don't appear to tally with my bank statements :eek:, but i have to take a closer look to confirm this first. They have also sent a notice of assignment, but have said they will send the statements of accounts when they get them from egg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're claiming a refund of premiums, it's up to them to prove you asked for the PPI, and that it was sold to you fairly - not the other way round.

 

Strange request that. Think they have their knickers in a bit of a twist over this one. By asking for the T&Cs, it implies they don't have them themselves - which looks very bad for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...