Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rossendales/Council tax pain in the rear ***WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5002 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Arrived home this evening to a "best wishes" letter from ****'n'dales saying collecting fees after ive paid the £42.50 that is now £134 ish.. Told him his only entitled to collect council debt and as that is paid his entitled to 'No Penny's' !

Tried to argue the fact that there now chasing there unpaid fee's debt, so at that i said 'See you in court then chumpy' and hung up.

Will send a third email in the morning asking again for there records they hold on me.

 

Oh the joys of a weekend break

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok FINALLY got a reply from rossendales.

 

Sent me a breakdown of charges but say i need a SAR to get screenshots !!

 

 

Summary

 

Date Type Amount Amount outstanding

Sep 8 2009 Debt 870.71 0.00

Oct 20 2009 Visit 1 24.50 0.00

Oct 26 2009 Visit 2 18.00 0.00

Feb 17 2010 Attendance/Van 110.00 110.00

Feb 17 2010 Levy fee 24.50 24.50

Feb 21 2010 Payment byD/C 0.80 0.00

 

 

Payments

 

Oct 23 2009 870.71

Feb 21 2010 43.30

 

 

Ok so paid council on 23rd after first visit, paid for visit 1 and 2 to be on safe side now if im correct they owe ME £18 ?

 

Not sure what the Levy fee is all about !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feb 17 2010 Attendance/Van 110.00 110.00

Feb 17 2010 Levy fee 24.50 24.50

 

what did the bailiff levy

did he leave you a notice of seizure of goods and inventory

 

the bailiff has only levied on his fees that why your levy fee is only £24.50

bailiffs cant charge a van fee and a levy fee the same day

 

In my opinion the bailiff is allowed to levy for his fees others may disagree so you will have to make your own mind

 

I'm not saying that the bailiff has a valid levy it doesn't look as if he has

 

send them an e-mail and ask what goods were levied and why there was no notice of seizure of goods and inventory left at the time the alleged levy

the name of the baillif that caried out the levy what court he was certificated at on what date

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

Distress

45.—(1) Where a liability order has been made, the authority which applied for the order may levy the appropriate amount by distress and sale of the goods of the debtor against whom the order was made.

 

 

(2) The appropriate amount for the purposes of paragraph (1) is the aggregate of—

  • (a) an amount equal to any outstanding sum which is or forms part of the amount in respect of which the liability order was made, and

  • (b) a sum determined in accordance with Schedule 5 in respect of charges connected with the distress.

(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

 

(4) Where an authority has seized goods of the debtor in pursuance of the distress, but before sale of those goods the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount, the sale shall not be proceeded with and the goods shall be made available for collection by the debtor.

 

(5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All that was posted through letter box was "Bailiff removal" letter

 

Date 17/02 Time 12 00

 

Hand written is the following

 

Outstanding bailiff costs to be paid in full £177

Link to post
Share on other sites

usually when they cant get in the house they levy a car or things in the garden but they must leave a notice of seizure of goods and inventory at the time of the levy

 

 

send them an e-mail and ask what goods were levied and why there was no notice of seizure of goods and inventory left at the time the alleged levy

 

when you send the e-mail remind them they are legally bound by the

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 Regulation 45 SCHEDULE 5

(5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok will do.. Would it be worth my while to send them £10 for a SAR ?

 

 

personally i don't think so it would be a waste of £10

 

they know they have no levy and i cant see them taking it any further after you question the levy

 

Ask for a copy of there complaints procedure in your e-mail

 

and put at the bottom of it

A copy of this e-mail will be sent to xxx council to be held on file and will be used should it be if necessary to take this matter further

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will this suffice ?

 

After receiving your reply to my request for a charges breakdown and screenshot of my account, I would like to ask what goods were levied and why there was no notice of seizure of goods and inventory left at the time of the alleged levy.

I now also require the name of the baillif that caried out the levy and what court he was certificated at on what date.

 

May I remind you about the "The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992" as you are bound by it;

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

Distress

45.—(1) Where a liability order has been made, the authority which applied for the order may levy the appropriate amount by distress and sale of the goods of the debtor against whom the order was made.

 

 

(2) The appropriate amount for the purposes of paragraph (1) is the aggregate of—

(a) an amount equal to any outstanding sum which is or forms part of the amount in respect of which the liability order was made, and

(b) a sum determined in accordance with Schedule 5 in respect of charges connected with the distress.

(3) If, before any goods are seized, the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount and the levy shall not be proceeded with.

 

(4) Where an authority has seized goods of the debtor in pursuance of the distress, but before sale of those goods the appropriate amount (including charges arising up to the time of the payment or tender) is paid or tendered to the authority, the authority shall accept the amount, the sale shall not be proceeded with and the goods shall be made available for collection by the debtor.

 

(5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into.

 

I also ask for a copy of your complaints procedure as I note from your records I have paid for 2 visits when in fact the Liability order was paid 'In Full' after the first visit and before the second and I am awaiting a refund for £18 due to myself for your mis-handling of this case along with an offer of compensation for my "Distress".

 

A copy of this e-mail will be sent to XXXXX Borough Council to be held on file and will be used should it be if necessary to take this matter further.

 

Eggy12

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will this suffice ?

 

After receiving your reply to my request for a charges breakdown and screenshot of my account,

The breakdown of charges includes a levy fee there was no notice of seizure of goods and inventory left at the time of the alleged levy. this must be left at the time of the levy

For your convenience i have copied the relevant part of the regulations

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 Regulation 45 SCHEDULE 5

5) The person levying distress on behalf of an authority shall carry with him the written authorisation of the authority, which he shall show to the debtor if so requested; and he shall hand to the debtor or leave at the premises where the distress is levied a copy of this regulation and Schedule 5 and a memorandum setting out the appropriate amount, and shall hand to the debtor a copy of any close or walking possession agreement entered into.

 

I therefore require a copy of this or at the very least a list of goods levied

I now also require the name of the bailiff that carried out the levy and what court he was certificated at on what date.

 

I also ask for a copy of your complaints procedure as

I note from your records I have paid for 2 visits when in fact the Liability order was paid 'In Full' after the first visit and before the second and I am awaiting a refund for £18 due to myself for your mis-handling of this case along with an offer of compensation for my "Distress".

 

A copy of this e-mail will be sent to XXXXX Borough Council to be held on file and will be used should it be if necessary to take this matter further.

 

Eggy12[/quote

 

 

that makes it a bit shorter but leave in the relevant part of the regulations

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a phone call (wow that was quick) from bailiff in charge asking if we can sort this out ! After semi explaining the rights and wrongs we again got to the stage of me saying 'see you in court then' !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst you're at it, don't forget to ask them for a copy of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. This clearly explains the paperwork you should have had and the Standards should be available from any bailiff or bailiff company on request :)

Best wishes.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
type o
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang him.. His full of brown stuff.. Wont even send me a copy of National Standards for Enforcement Agents as suggested by Kel... The convo then went onto him not being able to copy a copy of it(Due to fact his not online and all that) but he did say his in the area on Wed.. NICE so i said drop in in then ! Bleated on about his rights and lets come to a solution so i again said see you in court, ive sent a message to your company asking for your name and what court you were certified at to no response.. Just trying to remember how many times i told him his full of it ? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for asking, eggy12, I've been waiting for someone to do so. There is so much possible fun provided by the National Standards!

 

You can even write a complaint to his company, to the relevant LA CEO [FORMAL COMPLAINT], and to your MP...

 

Here's what he should be doing [not sure if the last one applies to you but thought I'd put it in] :

 

Information and confidentiality

 

All notices, correspondence and documentation issued by the agent/agency must be clear and unambiguous and to the satisfaction of the creditor.

 

Copies of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents must be freely available from the offices of enforcement agencies, or agents on request and wherever possible from creditors.

 

Enforcement agents should provide clear and prompt information to debtors and where appropriate, creditors.

 

Enforcement agents should, so far as it is practical, avoid disclosing the purpose of their visit to anyone other than the debtor. Where the debtor is not seen, the relevant documents must be left at the address in a sealed envelope addressed to the debtor.

 

 

I appreciate it's not law but it is the standard most of them agree they should be working to. The more people who help them achieve this by reminding them the better :)

 

 

Best wishes.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
Do read the National Standards - they're written clearly in the hope a bailiff can understand them...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Will mention the last next time as the scraps of paper have never been sealed, maybe its because his used all his salava spewing brown stuff to the last unlucky honest person on his list..

 

Watch This Space :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion the bailiff is allowed to levy for his fees others may disagree so you will have to make your own mind

this statement of mine has been bugging me cant believe i wrote it must be needing a holiday (eggy12 please accept my apologies for my mistake )

 

the bailiff was entitled to his first visit fee but he cant levy goods against it as they can only levy against the amount of the liability order outstanding at the time of the levy

 

it wont make a difference to the outcome of this post as you owe the bailiff nothing thats why he has been on the phone to you asking if we can sort this out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a prob HW.. We all have bad days ;) Bailiff's was yesterday pmsl

 

17th February 2010, 20:32 #3 (permalink)

hallowitch

Classic Account Holder

 

send him £24.50 1st visit fee tell him that under The council tax (administration and enforcement ) regulations 1992(amended )

regulation 45 charges connected with distress this is all you are legally entitled to pay

However if they want more fees to send you a screenshot of your account

after you have received this and depending on what it contains will depend on what further action you will take regarding the remainder of the fees they are trying to collect

you may have to pay a 2nd visit fee of £18

 

 

 

I listened to you .. Thanks for your help and have a beer/wine on me

 

Eggy12

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...