Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LINK FINANCIAL - Advice Please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4654 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately I still can't really make it put enough to give clearer advice on it, except that it clearly states it is an application form, is there a 'Right to cancel' box on there?

 

Thanks for having a look.

 

Yes there is a box marked "Your Right To Cancel"

 

It goes on....Once you have signed this agreement you will have for a short time a right to cancel it. Exact details of how and when I can do this will be sent to you by post by the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Then IMO it is unenforceable, however please wait until someone who knows about CCA's and what they are talking about confirms this for you.

That just confirms that it is an application form and not the actual agreement, as on the agreement they 'would' or 'should' have sent you it will clearly state on it that you have a right to cancel within X amount of days.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then IMO it is unenforceable, however please wait until someone who knows about CCA's and what they are talking about confirms this for you.

That just confirms that it is an application form and not the actual agreement, as on the agreement they 'would' or 'should' have sent you it will clearly state on it that you have a right to cancel within X amount of days.

 

 

Cheers for that.

 

The box "Your Right To Cancel" is on the lower right of the application form.Just above where it was signed by me. Above which is another box confirming that the info given by myself is true etc, and this box appears to have been writtten or signed on by someone called Hogan ??

 

There is nothing on the rear of the application relating to cancelling the agreement.

 

I will standby for someone else to give me their opinion.

 

I seem to think that a true copy of a CCA should be A4 in size?

 

Thanks again...Nice avatar...RA??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hello All,

 

Well it`s been a while since I posted regarding my problems with LINK.

 

Until mid-January 2011 I had not heard from them since early May last year.

 

Anyway in mid-January 2011 I recieved a call from their office in South Wales.

 

They wanted me to go for a Full and Final Settlement - I told them that as I had not received a true copy off of the CCA I was still in dispute with them.

 

The woman on the phone said one would be sent, and that she would get back in touch and look at a Full and Final Settlement.

 

On 18 January 2011 I recieved 2 x photocopied A4 sheets from LINK. One showing the "Priority Application Form" and the other the "Terms and Conditions" . Exactly the same as the photo copied form that they sent me in May 2010, except that now its on two sheets of paper !!!

 

Its now nearly two months since LINK phoned me. I have had no further contact with them either by phone or in writing !!!

 

I would have thought that IF my account was enforcable that they would have been contacting me way before January 2011 - if it were. After all its an 8 month gap between sending a document that they claims fulfils their obligations.

 

Add to this the fact that they haven`t contacted me since they sent the A4 sheets in January 2011 - which would also seem to indicate that the agreement is not enforcable !??

 

Your thoughts please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

.....and so the saga continues !!

 

A few weeks ago I had a letter from a company called Elmswood - Which is part of LINK Outsourcing. The letter offered me a discount if I started to make payments again. As I do not beleive the agreement is enforcable I ignored it.

 

Anyway, today I have had a letter from LINK threatening court action if I do not contact them within 14 days.

 

I`m not sure if this a bluff on their part or not - after all the account has been in dispute for 18 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello doodlesack, just gone back over your thread to refresh my memory.

 

As this has been going on for so long now, the goal posts have moved, in their favour unfortunately.

 

The enforceability argument has been eroded somewhat due to the likes of rankine etc, so this shouldn't be relied upon as a solid defence.

However there is a thread on here which goes into some detail about how you can question reconstituted agreements and fight back. (They are now allowed to send recon agreements and have successfully used them in court to win)

 

Have you been able to learn how to post up your scans yet??

 

What does the letter from link say? If you can't scan and post it up, then if you can type out their exact words, less for your details etc.

 

Do they still use the words 'may' 'if' 'possible'?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Bazooka Boo. Hope the scans (above) are bigger?

 

 

I cant say I have heard of Rankine and I dont know anything about recon agreements - a little research needed on my part there !!

 

 

 

The letter reads:

 

LETTER BEFORE COURT ACTION

 

Link outsourcing limited has attempted to recover the outstanding balance from you but has however been unsuccessful.

 

County Court Proceedings will now be issued against you without further notice. We shall obtain and enforce a couty court judgement against you.This may affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

You should be aware that where applicable contractual interest will continue to be charged on the outstanding balance until the debt has been fully repaid. although we will not ask you to pay anymore than the amount you would have paid if you had continued to pay your account as per the original terms of the agreement.

 

You may be liable for the costs of any action we take and statutory interest will accrue on your account at 8% for the full period. We will also impose a maximum fee of £130.00 which you will be liable for.

 

IF YOU WISH TO PREVENT THIS COURSE OF ACTION PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED IN FULL WITHIN THE 14 DAY PERIOD.PLEASE CONTACT AN OFFICER ON 02920 808698 AS A MATTER OF URGENCY

Edited by doodlesack
Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd be forgiven in thinking that they do this as a matter of routine and no-one defends their claims? "We will obtain and enforce county court judgement against you" Really? Are you seriously that confident?

 

Time to hit them with the big boys guns I believe, a CPR request for exactly what documents they hold in order to rely on in court and win this CCJ...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I deal with Commercial Contract Law for a living, from the Right ( Truthful Side) and under the Contracts ( Rights of 3rd Parties Acts) they have no call on you for this.. .It goes a bit deeper than that, & am happy to help you with this, but in Essence, thats the bottom line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 31.14 is a request for them to provide you with all of the details/paperwork they intend to use against you in court, less of a request, more of a demand, it simply tells them that you are not one of the sheep, and you will fight them every step of the way. (And in most cases win!)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the replies.

 

So what did you make of the "Priority Application Form" / Terms and Conditions ??

 

Would that actually be considered as an agreement and more importantly would they be able to enforce it ??

 

Here they are again:

 

CCALARGE1740.jpg picture by jonesyboyo - Photobucket

 

http://s160.photobucket.com/albums/t...ALARGE2741.jpg

 

 

......and by the way Link have now started to to phone me at home !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't like to defend solely on the enforceability issue, you will be better pushing water up hill, the enforceability of paperwork is now as old as the wheel, they have been lucky and have managed to shift the goal posts, in their favour, you will need more than that to defend unfortunately.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't like to defend solely on the enforceability issue, you will be better pushing water up hill, the enforceability of paperwork is now as old as the wheel, they have been lucky and have managed to shift the goal posts, in their favour, you will need more than that to defend unfortunately.

 

 

Ok thanks for the info.

 

Reading between the lines, if they have all the paperwork it looks like I`m up the creek without a paddle !:???:

 

Dispite what davehayes has said I am considering sending a CPR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi davehayes if you have knowledge that

that third parties cannot chase debts it

would be most useful to be enlightened

as all the debt collection agencies and debt

purchasing companies are third parties assigned

to collect the debts or have bought them in view

of making a profit.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I still send a CPR even though they are only threatening court action at this stage ?

 

Oh yes without a shadow of doubt, this is often the favourite ploy of Bryan 'bloody' Carter, then when he receives the CPR request he soon scurries back off into his cave and hands it back to whoever is desperate enough for a suck on a lemon.

 

The CPR request, is telling them to provide you with all of the documents they intend to rely on in court to enforce a judgement, it costs you nothing less for the price of recorded delivery 1st class, and it may have the desired effect that they do indeed realise that they have nothing to put before a court, therefore will stop threatening legal action and actually behave like adults.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yes without a shadow of doubt, this is often the favourite ploy of Bryan 'bloody' Carter, then when he receives the CPR request he soon scurries back off into his cave and hands it back to whoever is desperate enough for a suck on a lemon.

 

The CPR request, is telling them to provide you with all of the documents they intend to rely on in court to enforce a judgement, it costs you nothing less for the price of recorded delivery 1st class, and it may have the desired effect that they do indeed realise that they have nothing to put before a court, therefore will stop threatening legal action and actually behave like adults.

 

 

 

Right cheers for the info.......Can you give this the once over please ?

 

 

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

I refer to your letter dated 25th August 2011.

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of each of the following document(s) mentioned.

 

The information must be furnished within fourteen days of the receipt of this letter. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

 

 

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor.

 

 

b. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with MNBA.

 

 

c. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

 

 

d. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and the terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

 

 

e. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

 

 

f. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

 

 

g. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

h. A list of third party agencies to which you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

 

 

i. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

 

 

I will require this information within the next fourteen days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...