Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

THe Court Hearing today - Urgent Help please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

We went to court today to face Bankruptcy from an old creditor.

Their Solicitor turned up and sat down with us for 15 minutes before we went in front of the Judge.

 

We explained

a) We did not receive the Statute Demand. They claimed we did. The have a written truth something from someone saying they sent us a card saying they would turn up at 9pm, but came at 5pm and pushed it through our letterbox.

 

b) We believe this debt to be statute barred which we told them back on October to produce proof it was not. They turned up at court claiming the documents had been archived and it takes time to get them out

 

c) We offered to pay £40 a month to try and stop this going to court. They declined saying they wanted at least half the debt £600 straight away and suggested we borrowed it from friends, PLUS £40 a month.

 

The Judge told my husband and I to go see Citizens Advice Bureau immediately. The case has been adjourned for 4 weeks which allows the creditors to pull out the documents to prove it is not Statute barred. If it is not statute barred the Judge will put the debt against our home and should we fail to make the payments of £40 a month ( which has still nto been agreed with the creditor ) then the home can be sold to pay off the debt.

The solicitor for the creditor then asked the judge if it was OK to give copy of the statute demand to us there and then..he agreed.

 

I was trying to hold back the tears as they explained to us what was happnening. THe Judge again looked at my husband and said Go SEE CAB !

 

We went to CAB straight from court but you have to turn up in a morning at 9am and queue. I will do this Monday.

 

I thought though the only a debt signed to be secured against your home could in fact be secured against your home?

Should we get a solicitor? Do they cost much?

My husband has suggested we sell the house now and go into rented accommodation, pay the debt and then see if we can buy again.

We have a £35k equity in the house.

 

The debt today stood at £1500, but the Solicitor asked the judge if she could add today's court proceedings costs to the debt and he said yes, so it continues to go up and up.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also was led to believe that should you ask the creditor for a copy of the original agreement and a copy of the account and they did not bring it to court that the judge would say no to the petition, but he just agreed all the time with the solicitor when she asked for a adjournment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that the actual status of the account is undetermined I be3lieve that the judge is in the wrong to allow costs to either party, you really needed to get this sorted at an earlier stage. You needed to stand up for yourself in court, the solicitors do this on a daily basis and will happily coerce the judge to suite their own ends

 

If they haven't yet proven that the debt is not statute barred then the judge needed to make an order for them to do so BEFORE any sanctions were made against you, this is assuming that the debt is substatiated by an agreement in the first place

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam

 

Yes this is the same one. The court hearing was today. I felt such a fool.

I an unsure what I can and cannot say to the judge. AM I allowed to say hang on, your charging us for them not having the documents ready for a case they brought ?

 

I am supposed to be going to CAB on Monday, but I have been offered 4 weeks of work, which in our current circumstances I think I should take. When can I get the time to go see CAB when you have to turn up at 9am and queue?

 

Totally shocked and not understanding what is going on.

 

Mu Husband and I are putting our house on the market next weekend. Sell up, pay off and run for cover. Breaks our heart as the house we live in was built by his late parents. BUt what else can we do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot see the reason for selling the house. The debt is for £1500 whcih in the scale of things is not a large amount.

 

The Judge is saying that the creditor can put a Charging Order against your house which can only be turned into an order for sale if you fail to keep up the repayments of £40 - and this is only if they prove it is not statute barred. If it is you are in the clear.

 

You seem to be panicing - don't calm down and think about this rationally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sam

 

Yes this is the same one. The court hearing was today. I felt such a fool.

I an unsure what I can and cannot say to the judge. AM I allowed to say hang on, your charging us for them not having the documents ready for a case they brought ? you had stated that this debt was statute barred.

LOWELL claimed a attempted payment 5 1/2 years ago for £1.70 odd:rolleyes:

you denied this and asked for proof.this was back in october,they never sent ANY PROOF.how the hell as this got to court.

you should have come back for further help.:(so you knew what to write on your form/and what to say in court.

 

as spam says no order should have been made.

but you should have stuck up for yourselfs.

 

if they had this back in october WHY was this not send to you

why did they not produce it in court.

DID YOU SAY ANY OF THIS?

 

I am supposed to be going to CAB on Monday, but I have been offered 4 weeks of work, which in our current circumstances I think I should take. When can I get the time to go see CAB when you have to turn up at 9am and queue?

 

Totally shocked and not understanding what is going on.

 

Mu Husband and I are putting our house on the market next weekend. Sell up, pay off and run for cover. Breaks our heart as the house we live in was built by his late parents. BUt what else can we do?

 

you can post here.get the help that you need.why should you pay,you claim that it is statute barred.

 

they have been given 4 wks to produce.

so you have 4 wks to get your self ready for next time.

you have to be polite in court,but you HAVE to stand up.

 

would start by listing,what has happened since october.

sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt was a credit card with HSBC Bank. We also had a bank account with them which was overdrawn I believe.

My husband and I separated and I opened a separate account in another bank. So did he. This was in March 2003. Neither of used the account or the card since then.

They are saying that a payment of £1.93 was made in July 2004 from my husband. We dispute that.

When we first received the Petition asking us to go to court we sent a letter to both the court and Lowell saying that a) this debt is statute barred and b) we did not receive the statute demand and asked for proof it was statue barred

 

After two weeks we received nothing from either Lowell or the court. I rang the court first and asked that this case should not be going to court until they have proved it is not a statute barred debt. The court said the case WILL go ahead but my letter would be taken into consideration.

I then contacted Lowell and asked again for a copy of the signed contract, and accounts details of when these payments were supposed to have been made. They aplogised and explained they are sorry for being unprofessional and will get back to us. I made this phone call to them every two weeks until Jan 8th our court date.

 

IN court I told the Judge I had asked for these details and that I had rang them every two weeks, I even told them the guys name who apologised to us for being so unprofessional. Their Solicitor then piped in saying that the documents had been archived and it takes time to find them. That is when the Judge said you have 4 more weeks to find them.

The Judge did said to their Solicitor to ask her client to consider the £40 payment as this debt is obviously an old one. She said she would speak to them.

 

Right at the end, I was crying and trying so hard to hold it in and no make a fool of myself when the Solicitor asked for "reasonable costs to be added" and the Judge said yes.

He then said see you in four weeks and we were all stood up. BY the time it had sunk in they were getting costs we were out the door and too late to say anything.

 

When we go back I want to say:

 

a) How come they bought the case on Jan 8th without having the account details with them and forcing my husband to take a day off work with no pay and yet we took with us all our documents.

 

b) If it is Statute barred, what happens next? Do we get our costs paid for false claims? Should I ask?

c) If they prove it is not statute barred ( what happens if some money went into our account that we were no longer using and they made a min payment to the card from that account? Can that Happen? £1.93 is such a weird amount. Could it be a rebate from some other company?

If it is not statute barred, do we just agree to paying the £40 a month or do we still dispute the extra costs added?

 

d) Can I suggest to the Judge that in most cases at the first court case if they cannot prove after we have requested it is statue bared then the case is thrown out?

 

Thank you for anything you can help with

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, we had offered before the court case to pay £40 a month, they turned it down and insisted on £600 up front then £40 a month.

This was discussed in court and the Solicitor argued that at £40 a month it would take a long time to clear the debt.

The Judge told her to speak to her client about that they should have accepted the £40 a month.

My Husband piped up " They say they allowed us to make a payment in 2004 of £1.93 but £40 is not good enough? Something stinks about this if you ask me" Nobody else said anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What has the Judge actually ordered Lowell to produce? and has he ordered them to produce the documents to you prior to the next hearing?

 

I had a Judge at my first hearing who also seemed not so understanding, but did order disclosure and a witness statement, at the next hearing we had a totally different Judge who didn't like the fact that Lowell hadn't complied with the request!!

 

So all is not lost:)

Capitalism is the legitimate racket

of the ruling class.

Al Capone

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...