Jump to content


mranother v BCT HP Agreement-Court filed.


mranother
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4963 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lot of things - basically I didnt have a leg to stand on apparently.

He wasn't interested in the 1500 quids worth of charges and the rate in which the charges were applied.

He wasn't interested in the pressure for larger payments, or the fact that there could be an underwriting agreement that wasn't provided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - I would agree with that completely. He just wasn't in the mood for it at all!, even said that I "carp[ed]" on about the charges!!

How can applying a total of 24 charges, plus additional late payment charges be "fair and reasonable".

What was also frustrating was the fact that one of my comments was that I hadnt received all of the terms and conditions until I performed an S.A.R - he said that this wasn't the truth and that I had obviously had them!!!! Despite the fact that you could blatently see that the front two pages of the agreement (all I saw and received) were faxed and the additional were actual printouts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...