Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Data Protection Breach by CCS Debt Collection


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5290 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I'm new to this so please excuse me.

I moved out of my property end of August 2009, and handed it over to my daughter. We were on a key meter with Scottish Power for Electricity. On hand over we were approx £10 in credit on the meter with no debt. The debt finished around the begining of the year. I started getting phonecalls from a company calling themselves CCS (aka S C Grays). The first woman demanded my first name, I said if they knew who I was they would have it, apparantly they only had my initial. But I have always had it drummed into me that if you do not know who is on the other end of the phone, yoyu give them no information whatsoever. She then started shouting at me, so I just went silent, then refused to give any information. The next phonecall was more interesting. Another nicely spoken woman rang me, obviously the soft approach, and again I would not supply any information. She said they had been sending me letters, I explained that I did not live there any more, she then proceeded to give me my old address. Totally gob smacked I played along with her, and she then told me I owed £38 odd on my electricity account. I explained that it was not possible.

I have since been told that as I did not give her my details and she offered them to me over the phone without even knowing I was the correct person that she was in Breach of Data Protection. The next time someone rang, I explained the situation, and he became very scared. he told me that all the phone conversations were recorded, and he had done his job correctly, and did I agree, was he doing it correctly. Which he was. I had one more phonecall, which I hauled up the data Protection and they have never been in touch since.

 

Obviously, I don't want to let this to lie. What can I do?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If their has been a period of 12 months where the Utility company has not asked for payment toward this, then you can tell them to politely foxtrot Oscar.

 

If you believe that they have breached the DPA, then you should make a complaint about them to the ICO, aswell as getting the companies (Scottish Powers) Complaints procedure, you'll need to do this in any case if you want other agencies to act on your behalf.

 

Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998, data protection policy - ICO

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

They sent it to a debt agency within 2 months. very quick. I have had problems with S C Gray before. Claimed I owed £1,000 for gas, I paid £20 a month stupidly until they produced bills as we were on a key meter. I then stopped paying and they rang me up, I explained that I had made these payments as a gesture of goodwill. Apparantly she had been sent copies of my bill by email, and 11 months down the line I still have not had copies of them and haven't had any phonecalls from them since. I did have a debt, but no where near where the amount that they were claiming. I will get in touch with CCS and make the comlaint officially through them ASAP. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you contact them either via email or letter only! Do Not ring them, EVER!

 

If you send them a letter, make sure it is sent recorded delivery, so you know they have received it then, or the free way is to email them, again this is a perfectly Legal and acceptable form of correspondence.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, have done. Used to be an advice worker quite a few years ago so that was always drummed into me. Waiting to see if I get a response, the first time somebody rand me about this she was shouting at me on the phone because I wouldn't give my details out to a perfect stranger. Think it strange that they don't know my first name. Only know me as H and my surname. I also told them that I have worked with Data Protection for over 20 years and what she did was a no go. I was also a CCTV operator, and Data Protection around that is so tight.

But how do I prove that this has caused me distress? It's so difficult. I shouldn't have to put up with shouting on the phone. I'm well aware of their bullying tactics, but when you are subjected to it, it's horrible.

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard one to prove unless it's all been recorded and someone else is able to give their opinion.

 

If it makes you feel any better, complain to your telephone operator and report the number as a malicious caller, and complain to the OFT who supposedly Police this sort of thing.

 

There is the telecomms act,

Telecommunications Act 1984 (c. 12) - Statute Law Database

 

And: Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c. 40)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had 2 responses from CCS.

 

After the first response I emailed the telephone number they had been calling mr from and magically they suddenly knew who I was

 

1st response

Your email to our Mr ******* has been forwarded to me for investigation.

 

We have searched our system and we can confirm that we have no live accounts in your name at the address you have given and in the sum which you have quoted.

 

We can only assume that the power company have passed an account in your name to another debt collection agency, which you have mistakenly thought was ourselves.

 

We hold no data in connection with you and no telephone number to have made the call to you.

 

We are sorry that we are unable to assist you further but we are not pursuing an account in your name.

2nd Response

Thank you very much for providing this additional information. This has enabled us to make a further search of the system and we have located the account upon which you have received calls. Your details were supplied to us by our Client.

 

We can see that you have spoken to a number of operatives but we can only see that you have spoken to one female, who has actually now left our employment. We continue to look into the matter and will revert to you in due course, but in the meantime, would wish to express our sincere apologies for any inconvenience caused and would stress that we have immediately closed the account and have returned the same to our Client advising that you are no longer at the address and you will not hear further from us. We confirm that we have removed your details from our system.

 

We trust that you will appreciate that we can only act upon the instructions of our Client, but we do sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.

 

 

Bit of luck that this employee has left. Which is probably a load of rubbish. Best of it is, I spoke to 2 females. I was told by an employee there that all phonecalls are recorded. So I'm gonna push my luck on this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just had an email from CCS who have found the telephone calls they made to me. If I want to hear them, bearing in mind it's of me, they will charge me £10 per call. That's £20. Are they allowed to do this? They will not email them over to me as I have done in the past. I cannot believe that they are wanting this amount of money from me. Is it not my right to be able to listern to them for nothing.

 

They are denying everything, that is after having denied they were the people calling me, then they denied that 2 different women had rung me, they are saying that during the first phonecall the caller did not shout at me she was just 'strong'.

 

Hmmmm

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - there Is a fee payable, but it is CAPPED at £10 for EVERYTHING not 'per call' . It is not your 'right' - the calls were made by the firm and they are obliged to provide a copy at the prevailing rate. If you record your own calls, you save on this expense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Youy are making a (SAR) and it is the (ICO) that has capped the costs at £10. This covers ALL data they hold on you, calls (IF recorded, but they've admitted this), and usually screen grabs of all pages that refer to their dealings with you from their computer system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is the (Information Commissioners Office) that has capped the costs at £10

 

The charge is specified in the regulations (not the Act) here -

 

The Data Protection (Subject Access) (Fees and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2000 (No. 191) - Statute Law Database

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Five of the main energy supply companies in the UK have signed up to the Billing Code, namely British Gas, npower, EDF Energy, E.ON Powergen and Scottish Power. The Billing Code provides consumers with additional protection over and above that required by the regulator Ofgem for accurate and informative billing.

The Code includes a requirement for consumers to be protected from debt where the supplier is at fault for not billing energy supply. Where the supplier is at fault, consumers cannot be back-billed beyond 12 months from the date on any subsequent bill.

 

 

About the Code

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to bring you all up date, CCS have informed me that they will be entering into no more contact with myself. personally I think it's beacause she has said to much already. But that was my aim, but all the statements she made, she would not clarrify what she meant. Hmmm! But I did email with a few facts, a sort of parting gesture, and wished all at CCS a happy xmas and good new year.

Waiting to hear back from Scottish Power about wether CCS own the debt or wether CCS are acting on behalf of Scottish Power.

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...